Farming Upward: The TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as a County-Level Model for Context-Specific Smart Agriculture
Research Article  ·  Published: 08 May 2026
Issue cover
Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026: 68-78
Research Article Open Access

Farming Upward: The TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as a County-Level Model for Context-Specific Smart Agriculture

1 Beijing TsingSky Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
* Corresponding Author: Yiyi Wang, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 2
You have full access to this open access article · CC BY 4.0 License

Article Information

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global food-security concerns, climate change, farmland constraints, and accelerating urbanization, modern agriculture is shifting from a land-dependent model toward a new paradigm shaped by spatial reconfiguration, energy integration, advanced equipment, and digital intelligence. Food systems account for a large share of anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions, making low-carbon transformation a central issue. Projected global food demand and hunger risk highlight the need for both productivity and resilience. Emissions from long-distance transport also suggest that localized production near consumption centers deserves greater attention. Taking the TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as its central case, this article explores how county-level demonstration projects can serve as anchors for context-specific smart agriculture. Smart agriculture should be understood not merely as the application of sensors or data platforms, but as the creation of sustainable, replicable, and industrialized systems adapted to local conditions. Controlled-environment agriculture offers a promising pathway for high-yield, resource-efficient, climate-resilient production, but its viability depends on energy efficiency, cost structure, and system integration. The TsingSky Guangzhou Sky Farm redefines agricultural space by utilizing approximately 50 mu of factory rooftop area and integrating residual industrial heat, shallow-water source heat pumps, agricultural R&D, and intelligent equipment manufacturing into a unified county-level platform. This model preserves farmland, supports production near consumer markets, reduces pest and logistics pressures, improves spatial efficiency, and enhances economic performance. More importantly, it shows how a single demonstration project can evolve into a future agriculture cluster through integration of production, research, manufacturing, training, branding, and low-carbon energy systems.

Graphical Abstract

Farming Upward: The TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as a County-Level Model for Context-Specific Smart Agriculture

Keywords

smart agriculture controlled-environment agriculture sky farm county-level development agricultural cluster context-specific development low-carbon agriculture integrated rural industries

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

Yiyi Wang and Xiaoqing Wang are affiliated with the Beijing TsingSky Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China. The authors declare that this affiliation had no influence on the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or the decision to publish, and that no other competing interests exist.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F. N., & Leip, A. J. N. F. (2021). Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature food, 2(3), 198-209.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Van Dijk, M., Morley, T., Rau, M. L., & Saghai, Y. (2021). A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nature food, 2(7), 494-501.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, M., Jia, N., Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Wei, L., Jin, Y., & Raubenheimer, D. (2022). Global food-miles account for nearly 20\% of total food-systems emissions. Nature food, 3(6), 445-453.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Van Delden, S. H., SharathKumar, M., Butturini, M., Graamans, L. J. A., Heuvelink, E., Kacira, M., ... & Marcelis, L. F. M. (2021). Current status and future challenges in implementing and upscaling vertical farming systems. Nature Food, 2(12), 944-956.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engler, N., & Krarti, M. (2021). Review of energy efficiency in controlled environment agriculture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, 110786.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dsouza, A., Newman, L., Graham, T., & Fraser, E. D. (2023). Exploring the landscape of controlled environment agriculture research: A systematic scoping review of trends and topics. Agricultural Systems, 209, 103673.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marttila, M. P., Uusitalo, V., Linnanen, L., & Mikkilä, M. H. (2021). Agro-industrial symbiosis and alternative heating systems for decreasing the global warming potential of greenhouse production. Sustainability, 13(16), 9040.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Seo, Y., & Seo, U. J. (2021). Ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems for horticulture greenhouses adjacent to highway interchanges: A case study in South Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110194.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Appolloni, E., Orsini, F., Specht, K., Thomaier, S., Sanyé-Mengual, E., Pennisi, G., & Gianquinto, G. (2021). The global rise of urban rooftop agriculture: A review of worldwide cases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, 126556.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Payen, F. T., Evans, D. L., Falagán, N., Hardman, C. A., Kourmpetli, S., Liu, L., ... & Davies, J. A. (2022). How much food can we grow in urban areas? Food production and crop yields of urban agriculture: a meta‐analysis. Earth's future, 10(8), e2022EF002748.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Verteramo Chiu, L. J., Nicholson, C. F., Gómez, M. I., & Mattson, N. M. (2024). A meta-analysis of yields and environmental performance of controlled-environment production systems for tomatoes, lettuce and strawberries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 469, 143142.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pylianidis, C., Osinga, S., & Athanasiadis, I. N. (2021). Introducing digital twins to agriculture. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 184, 105942.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ariesen-Verschuur, N., Verdouw, C., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2022). Digital Twins in greenhouse horticulture: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 199, 107183.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bagagiolo, G., Matranga, G., Cavallo, E., & Pampuro, N. (2022). Greenhouse robots: Ultimate solutions to improve automation in protected cropping systems—a review. Sustainability, 14(11), 6436.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ojo, M. O., & Zahid, A. (2022). Deep learning in controlled environment agriculture: A review of recent advancements, challenges and prospects. Sensors, 22(20), 7965.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, X., Bai, J., Fu, L., Lei, Y., Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., ... & Shen, B. (2024). Complementary waste heat utilization from data center to ecological farm: A technical, economic and environmental perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140495.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rasheed, A., Na, W. H., Lee, J. W., Kim, H. T., & Lee, H. W. (2021). Development and validation of air-to-water heat pump model for greenhouse heating. Energies, 14(15), 4714.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin, M., Elnour, M., & Siñol, A. C. (2023). Environmental life cycle assessment of a large-scale commercial vertical farm. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 40, 182-193.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Joensuu, K., Kotilainen, T., Räsänen, K., Rantanen, M., Usva, K., & Silvenius, F. (2024). Assessment of climate change impact and resource-use efficiency of lettuce production in vertical farming and greenhouse production in Finland: a case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 29(10), 1932-1944.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Banboukian, A., Chen, Y., & Thomas, V. M. (2025). The challenges of controlled environment hydroponic farming: a life cycle assessment of lettuce. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 30(7), 1691-1704.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dauchot, G., Aubry, C., Crème, A., Dorr, E., & Gabrielle, B. (2024). Energy consumption as the main challenge faced by indoor farming to shorten supply chains. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 9, 100127.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaiser, E., Kusuma, P., Vialet-Chabrand, S., Folta, K. M., Liu, Y., Poorter, H., ... & Marcelis, L. F. (2024). Vertical farming goes dynamic: optimizing resource use efficiency, product quality, and energy costs. Frontiers in Science, 2, 1411259.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2026). Farming Upward: The TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as a County-Level Model for Context-Specific Smart Agriculture. Digital Intelligence in Agriculture, 2(2), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.62762/DIA.2026.309098
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Wang, Yiyi
AU  - Wang, Xiaoqing
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/08
TI  - Farming Upward: The TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as a County-Level Model for Context-Specific Smart Agriculture
JO  - Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
T2  - Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
JF  - Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
SP  - 68
EP  - 78
DO  - 10.62762/DIA.2026.309098
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/DIA.2026.309098
KW  - smart agriculture
KW  - controlled-environment agriculture
KW  - sky farm
KW  - county-level development
KW  - agricultural cluster
KW  - context-specific development
KW  - low-carbon agriculture
KW  - integrated rural industries
AB  - Against the backdrop of global food-security concerns, climate change, farmland constraints, and accelerating urbanization, modern agriculture is shifting from a land-dependent model toward a new paradigm shaped by spatial reconfiguration, energy integration, advanced equipment, and digital intelligence. Food systems account for a large share of anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions, making low-carbon transformation a central issue. Projected global food demand and hunger risk highlight the need for both productivity and resilience. Emissions from long-distance transport also suggest that localized production near consumption centers deserves greater attention. Taking the TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as its central case, this article explores how county-level demonstration projects can serve as anchors for context-specific smart agriculture. Smart agriculture should be understood not merely as the application of sensors or data platforms, but as the creation of sustainable, replicable, and industrialized systems adapted to local conditions. Controlled-environment agriculture offers a promising pathway for high-yield, resource-efficient, climate-resilient production, but its viability depends on energy efficiency, cost structure, and system integration. The TsingSky Guangzhou Sky Farm redefines agricultural space by utilizing approximately 50 mu of factory rooftop area and integrating residual industrial heat, shallow-water source heat pumps, agricultural R&D, and intelligent equipment manufacturing into a unified county-level platform. This model preserves farmland, supports production near consumer markets, reduces pest and logistics pressures, improves spatial efficiency, and enhances economic performance. More importantly, it shows how a single demonstration project can evolve into a future agriculture cluster through integration of production, research, manufacturing, training, branding, and low-carbon energy systems.
SN  - 3069-3187
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Wang2026Farming,
  author = {Yiyi Wang and Xiaoqing Wang},
  title = {Farming Upward: The TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as a County-Level Model for Context-Specific Smart Agriculture},
  journal = {Digital Intelligence in Agriculture},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {68-78},
  doi = {10.62762/DIA.2026.309098},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/DIA.2026.309098},
  abstract = {Against the backdrop of global food-security concerns, climate change, farmland constraints, and accelerating urbanization, modern agriculture is shifting from a land-dependent model toward a new paradigm shaped by spatial reconfiguration, energy integration, advanced equipment, and digital intelligence. Food systems account for a large share of anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions, making low-carbon transformation a central issue. Projected global food demand and hunger risk highlight the need for both productivity and resilience. Emissions from long-distance transport also suggest that localized production near consumption centers deserves greater attention. Taking the TsingSky Guangzhou Future Agriculture Cluster as its central case, this article explores how county-level demonstration projects can serve as anchors for context-specific smart agriculture. Smart agriculture should be understood not merely as the application of sensors or data platforms, but as the creation of sustainable, replicable, and industrialized systems adapted to local conditions. Controlled-environment agriculture offers a promising pathway for high-yield, resource-efficient, climate-resilient production, but its viability depends on energy efficiency, cost structure, and system integration. The TsingSky Guangzhou Sky Farm redefines agricultural space by utilizing approximately 50 mu of factory rooftop area and integrating residual industrial heat, shallow-water source heat pumps, agricultural R\&D, and intelligent equipment manufacturing into a unified county-level platform. This model preserves farmland, supports production near consumer markets, reduces pest and logistics pressures, improves spatial efficiency, and enhances economic performance. More importantly, it shows how a single demonstration project can evolve into a future agriculture cluster through integration of production, research, manufacturing, training, branding, and low-carbon energy systems.},
  keywords = {smart agriculture, controlled-environment agriculture, sky farm, county-level development, agricultural cluster, context-specific development, low-carbon agriculture, integrated rural industries},
  issn = {3069-3187},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
984
PDF Downloads
189

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
ISSN: 3069-3187 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico