The Economic Singularity: Core Mathematical Model
Research Article  ·  Published: 08 May 2026
Issue cover
ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2, Issue 3, 2026: 195-203
Research Article Open Access

The Economic Singularity: Core Mathematical Model

1 National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine
* Corresponding Author: Mykola Yaremenko, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 3

Article Information

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamical systems model of an economy with recursively self-improving artificial intelligence and financialization. The model features quadratic self-amplification in both AI capability ($\lambda A^2$) and financial capital ($\gamma_F K_f^2$), coupled through investment flows. It is shown that under mild conditions, the system exhibits a finite-time singularity where AI capability, AI capital, and financial capital diverge. Near the singularity, the wealth ratio between capital owners and workers diverges super-exponentially, with financialization amplifying the exponent by a factor $\gamma_F/\eta$. Introducing taxes on AI returns ($\tau_{ai}$) and financial gains ($\tau_f$) yields three distinct long-run regimes: low-tax (extreme inequality), moderate-tax (stable mixed economy), and high-tax (post-scarcity with universal basic income), separated by critical thresholds derived from workers' budget constraint. Finally, a policy irreversibility result is established: a critical time exists before the singularity after which redistribution becomes politically impossible, as wealth concentration renders feasible tax rates vanishingly small. The results highlight the urgency of early intervention in AI-driven economies.

Keywords

artificial intelligence economic singularity financialization wealth inequality directed technical change dynamical systems phase transitions robot tax basic income

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The author declares that generative AI tools were used solely for language editing and translation assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. Specifically, DeepSeek-R1 was utilized to improve linguistic clarity and readability. The authors take full responsibility for the originality and accuracy of the final work.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed technical change. The review of economic studies, 69(4), 781-809.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 197-236). University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c14027
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bessen, J. E., Goos, M., Salomons, A., & Van den Berge, W. (2019). AI and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics, 37, S291-S340.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2016). The race between machine and man: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment (No. w22252). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2022). Prediction machines, updated and expanded: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lohn, A. J., & Musser, M. (2022). AI and compute: How much longer can computing power drive artificial intelligence progress? Center for Security and Emerging Technology. https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/AI-and-Compute-How-Much-Longer-Can-Computing-Power-Drive-Artificial-Intelligence-Progress_v2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Grasselli, M. R., & Costa Lima, B. (2012). An analysis of the Keen model for credit expansion, asset price bubbles and financial fragility. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 6(3), 191-210.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bezemer, D., Ryan-Collins, J., Van Lerven, F., & Zhang, L. (2023). Credit policy and the ‘debt shift’in advanced economies. Socio-Economic Review, 21(1), 437-478.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bostrom, N. (1998). How long before superintelligence. International Journal of Futures Studies, 2(1), 1-9. https://philpapers.org/rec/BOSHLB
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 333-372.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deming, D. J. (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The quarterly journal of economics, 132(4), 1593-1640.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on politics, 12(3), 564-581.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keen, S. (1995). Finance and economic breakdown: modeling Minsky’s “financial instability hypothesis”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17(4), 607-635.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Greenwood, R., & Scharfstein, D. (2013). The growth of finance. Journal of Economic perspectives, 27(2), 3-28.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guvenen, F., Kambourov, G., Kuruscu, B., Ocampo-Diaz, S., & Chen, D. (2019). Use it or lose it: Efficiency gains from wealth taxation (No. w26284). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., ... & Sifre, L. (2022, November). Training compute-optimal large language models. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 30016-30030). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3600270.3602446
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Krippner, G. R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-economic review, 3(2), 173-208.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Philippon, T. (2015). Has the US finance industry become less efficient? On the theory and measurement of financial intermediation. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1408-1438.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer/Belknap. https://biblio.co.nz/9780674430006
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013). A theory of optimal inheritance taxation. Econometrica, 81(5), 1851-1886.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Webb, M. (2019). The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Available at SSRN 3482150. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482150
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Yampolskiy, R. V. (2015). Artificial superintelligence: a futuristic approach. CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2019). The triumph of injustice: How the rich dodge taxes and how to make them pay. WW Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Yaremenko, M. (2026). The Economic Singularity: Core Mathematical Model. ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.62762/JAM.2026.366725
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Yaremenko, Mykola
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/08
TI  - The Economic Singularity: Core Mathematical Model
JO  - ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics
T2  - ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics
JF  - ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
SP  - 195
EP  - 203
DO  - 10.62762/JAM.2026.366725
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JAM.2026.366725
KW  - artificial intelligence
KW  - economic singularity
KW  - financialization
KW  - wealth inequality
KW  - directed technical change
KW  - dynamical systems
KW  - phase transitions
KW  - robot tax
KW  - basic income
AB  - This paper develops a dynamical systems model of an economy with recursively self-improving artificial intelligence and financialization. The model features quadratic self-amplification in both AI capability ($\lambda A^2$) and financial capital ($\gamma_F K_f^2$), coupled through investment flows. It is shown that under mild conditions, the system exhibits a finite-time singularity where AI capability, AI capital, and financial capital diverge. Near the singularity, the wealth ratio between capital owners and workers diverges super-exponentially, with financialization amplifying the exponent by a factor $\gamma_F/\eta$. Introducing taxes on AI returns ($\tau_{ai}$) and financial gains ($\tau_f$) yields three distinct long-run regimes: low-tax (extreme inequality), moderate-tax (stable mixed economy), and high-tax (post-scarcity with universal basic income), separated by critical thresholds derived from workers' budget constraint. Finally, a policy irreversibility result is established: a critical time exists before the singularity after which redistribution becomes politically impossible, as wealth concentration renders feasible tax rates vanishingly small. The results highlight the urgency of early intervention in AI-driven economies.
SN  - 3068-5656
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Yaremenko2026The,
  author = {Mykola Yaremenko},
  title = {The Economic Singularity: Core Mathematical Model},
  journal = {ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {195-203},
  doi = {10.62762/JAM.2026.366725},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JAM.2026.366725},
  abstract = {This paper develops a dynamical systems model of an economy with recursively self-improving artificial intelligence and financialization. The model features quadratic self-amplification in both AI capability (\$\lambda A^2\$) and financial capital (\$\gamma\_F K\_f^2\$), coupled through investment flows. It is shown that under mild conditions, the system exhibits a finite-time singularity where AI capability, AI capital, and financial capital diverge. Near the singularity, the wealth ratio between capital owners and workers diverges super-exponentially, with financialization amplifying the exponent by a factor \$\gamma\_F/\eta\$. Introducing taxes on AI returns (\$\tau\_{ai}\$) and financial gains (\$\tau\_f\$) yields three distinct long-run regimes: low-tax (extreme inequality), moderate-tax (stable mixed economy), and high-tax (post-scarcity with universal basic income), separated by critical thresholds derived from workers' budget constraint. Finally, a policy irreversibility result is established: a critical time exists before the singularity after which redistribution becomes politically impossible, as wealth concentration renders feasible tax rates vanishingly small. The results highlight the urgency of early intervention in AI-driven economies.},
  keywords = {artificial intelligence, economic singularity, financialization, wealth inequality, directed technical change, dynamical systems, phase transitions, robot tax, basic income},
  issn = {3068-5656},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
784
PDF Downloads
291

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics
ICCK Journal of Applied Mathematics
ISSN: 3068-5656 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico