Passive Image Forgery Detection Using Multiscale Weber Local Descriptor and SVM Classification
Research Article  ·  Published: 28 April 2026
Issue cover
ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026: 69-91
Research Article Open Access

Passive Image Forgery Detection Using Multiscale Weber Local Descriptor and SVM Classification

1 Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal 57000, Pakistan
2 Department of Information Technology and Management, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, United States
3 Hellenic American University, Nashua, NH 03063, United States
4 The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, United States
5 Concordia University, Mequon, WI 53097, United States
6 University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54770, Pakistan
* Corresponding Author: Misbah Ali, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 2

Article Information

Abstract

Digital image manipulation has become increasingly prevalent with the widespread availability of editing tools, raising concerns regarding image authenticity in critical applications. This study presents a passive image forgery detection framework based on multiscale Weber Local Descriptor features extracted from chrominance components and classified using a Support Vector Machine. The proposed method operates without embedded authentication information and focuses on detecting both copy-move and splicing forgeries through texture-based analysis. Experiments were conducted on two benchmark datasets, CASIA v2.0 and MICC F2000, using ten-fold cross-validation. On the CASIA v2.0 dataset, the framework achieved an overall classification accuracy of 97.0%, with a true positive rate of 98.4% for spliced images and an area under the ROC curve of 0.98. On the MICC F2000 dataset, the framework achieved an overall accuracy of 97.4%, with a true positive rate of 99.7% for copy-move forgery detection and an AUC value of 0.98. The results indicate consistent classification performance across different manipulation types and dataset characteristics. The use of chrominance channels enables the preservation of subtle manipulation artifacts, while multiscale texture representation enhances feature discrimination. The proposed framework demonstrates competitive performance compared to existing methods while maintaining moderate computational complexity, making it suitable for practical image authentication tasks.

Graphical Abstract

Passive Image Forgery Detection Using Multiscale Weber Local Descriptor and SVM Classification

Keywords

digital image forgery detection passive image authentication copy-move forgery image splicing weber local descriptor multiscale texture analysis chroma analysis support vector machine

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in this study are publicly available. The CASIA v2.0 dataset can be accessed via the Kaggle repository provided by the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/divg07/casia-20-image-tampering-detection-dataset. The MICC-F2000 dataset is available from the Visual Information Processing and Protection Group at the University of Florence: http://lci.micc.unifi.it/labd/2015/01/copy-move-forgery-detection-and-localization/. Both datasets were used without modification for model training and evaluation.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Sharma, P., Kumar, M., & Sharma, H. (2023). Comprehensive analyses of image forgery detection methods from traditional to deep learning approaches: an evaluation. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(12), 18117-18150.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh, S., & Kumar, R. (2024). Image forgery detection: comprehensive review of digital forensics approaches. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7(1), 877-915.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agarwal, S., Sharma, D., Girdhar, N., Kim, C., & Jung, K. H. (2025). A survey of image forensics: Exploring forgery detection in image colorization. Computers, Materials & Continua, 84(3), 4195-4221.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao, X., Li, S., Wang, S., Li, J., & Yang, K. (2012). Optimal chroma-like channel design for passive color image splicing detection. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012(1), 240.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parekh, R. (2025). Principles of multimedia. CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003588030
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Birajdar, G. K., & Mankar, V. H. (2013). Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: A survey. Digital investigation, 10(3), 226-245.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thakur, R., & Rohilla, R. (2020). Recent advances in digital image manipulation detection techniques: A brief review. Forensic science international, 312, 110311.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burger, W., & Burge, M. J. (2022). Digital image processing: An algorithmic introduction. Springer Nature.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tyagi, S., & Yadav, D. (2023). A detailed analysis of image and video forgery detection techniques. The Visual Computer, 39(3), 813-833.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Timothy, D. P., & Santra, A. K. (2024). Detecting Digital Image Forgeries with Copy-Move and Splicing Image Analysis using Deep Learning Techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(5).
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaur, G., Singh, N., & Kumar, M. (2023). Image forgery techniques: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(2), 1577-1625.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shallal, I., Rzouga Haddada, L., & Essoukri Ben Amara, N. (2025). Image forgery detection with focus on copy-move: An overview, real world challenges and future directions. Applied Sciences, 15(21), 11774.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ganguly, S., Mandal, S., Malakar, S., & Sarkar, R. (2023). Copy-move forgery detection using local tetra pattern based texture descriptor. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(13), 19621-19642.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, Y., Zheng, J., Fang, A., & Irfan, M. (2023). Feature enhancement and supervised contrastive learning for image splicing forgery detection. Digital Signal Processing, 136, 104005.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, J., Shan, S., He, C., Zhao, G., Pietikäinen, M., Chen, X., & Gao, W. (2009). WLD: A robust local image descriptor. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 32(9), 1705-1720.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nadimpalli, A. V., & Rattani, A. (2024). Social media authentication and combating deepfakes using semi-fragile invisible image watermarking. Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 5(4), 1-30.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Qazi, T., Ali, M., Hayat, K., & Magnier, B. (2022). Seamless copy–move replication in digital images. Journal of Imaging, 8(3), 69.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, H., Wang, L., Zhao, T., & Zhao, W. (2024). Local-peak scale-invariant feature transform for fast and random image stitching. Sensors, 24(17), 5759.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fridrich, J., Soukal, D., & Lukas, J. (2003, August). Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. In Proceedings of digital forensic research workshop (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 652-63). https://www.academia.edu/6069018/Detection_of_Copy_Move_Forgery_in_Digital_Images_a
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Popescu, A. C., & Farid, H. (2004). Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/cs_tr/254/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006, May). Surf: Speeded up robust features. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 404-417). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Amerini, I., Ballan, L., Caldelli, R., Del Bimbo, A., & Serra, G. (2011). A sift-based forensic method for copy–move attack detection and transformation recovery. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, 6(3), 1099-1110.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Christlein, V., Riess, C., Jordan, J., Riess, C., & Angelopoulou, E. (2012). An evaluation of popular copy-move forgery detection approaches. IEEE Transactions on information forensics and security, 7(6), 1841-1854.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mahdian, B., & Saic, S. (2007). Detection of copy–move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. Forensic science international, 171(2-3), 180-189.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Asghar, K., Sun, X., Rosin, P., Saddique, M., Hussain, M., & Habib, Z. (2019). Edge-texture feature based image forgery detection with cross dataset evaluation. Machine Vision and Applications, 30(7-8), 1243-1262.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, Z., Liu, B., Bi, X., Xiao, B., Li, W., Wang, G., & Gao, X. (2024). D-Net: A dual-encoder network for image splicing forgery detection and localization. Pattern Recognition, 155, 110727.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hussain, M., Saleh, S. Q., Aboalsamh, H., Muhammad, G., & Bebis, G. (2014, June). Comparison between WLD and LBP descriptors for non-intrusive image forgery detection. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings (pp. 197-204). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guido, R., Ferrisi, S., Lofaro, D., & Conforti, D. (2024). An overview on the advancements of support vector machine models in healthcare applications: a review. Information, 15(4), 235.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Saleh, S. Q., Hussain, M., Muhammad, G., & Bebis, G. (2013, July). Evaluation of image forgery detection using multi-scale weber local descriptors. In International symposium on visual computing (pp. 416-424). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ryu, S. J., Kirchner, M., Lee, M. J., & Lee, H. K. (2013). Rotation invariant localization of duplicated image regions based on Zernike moments. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 8(8), 1355-1370.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. CASIA 2.0 image tampering detection dataset. (n.d.). Kaggle. Retrieved March 18, 2026, from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/divg07/casia-20-image-tampering-detection-dataset/data
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MICC-F2000. (n.d.). MICC, University of Florence. https://lci.micc.unifi.it/labd/2015/01/copy-move-forgery-detection-and-localization/
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Farid, H. (2009). Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 26(2), 16–25.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. alZahir, S., & Hammad, R. (2020). Image forgery detection using image similarity. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(39), 28643-28659.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mahmood, T., Irtaza, A., Mehmood, Z., & Mahmood, M. T. (2017). Copy–move forgery detection through stationary wavelets and local binary pattern variance for forensic analysis in digital images. Forensic science international, 279, 8-21.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Diwan, A., Mahadeva, R., & Gupta, V. (2024). Advancing copy-move manipulation detection in complex image scenarios through multiscale detector. IEEE Access, 12, 64736-64753.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Ali, A., Raza, A., Syed, K., Mohan, S., Fatima, N., Umar, M. & Ali, M. (2026). Passive Image Forgery Detection Using Multiscale Weber Local Descriptor and SVM Classification. ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing, 3(2), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.62762/JIAP.2026.490874
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ali, Aamir
AU  - Raza, Aamir
AU  - Syed, Khaleelullah
AU  - Mohan, Swetank
AU  - Fatima, Nikhat
AU  - Umar, Muhammad
AU  - Ali, Misbah
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/04/28
TI  - Passive Image Forgery Detection Using Multiscale Weber Local Descriptor and SVM Classification
JO  - ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing
T2  - ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing
JF  - ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
SP  - 69
EP  - 91
DO  - 10.62762/JIAP.2026.490874
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JIAP.2026.490874
KW  - digital image forgery detection
KW  - passive image authentication
KW  - copy-move forgery
KW  - image splicing
KW  - weber local descriptor
KW  - multiscale texture analysis
KW  - chroma analysis
KW  - support vector machine
AB  - Digital image manipulation has become increasingly prevalent with the widespread availability of editing tools, raising concerns regarding image authenticity in critical applications. This study presents a passive image forgery detection framework based on multiscale Weber Local Descriptor features extracted from chrominance components and classified using a Support Vector Machine. The proposed method operates without embedded authentication information and focuses on detecting both copy-move and splicing forgeries through texture-based analysis. Experiments were conducted on two benchmark datasets, CASIA v2.0 and MICC F2000, using ten-fold cross-validation. On the CASIA v2.0 dataset, the framework achieved an overall classification accuracy of 97.0%, with a true positive rate of 98.4% for spliced images and an area under the ROC curve of 0.98. On the MICC F2000 dataset, the framework achieved an overall accuracy of 97.4%, with a true positive rate of 99.7% for copy-move forgery detection and an AUC value of 0.98. The results indicate consistent classification performance across different manipulation types and dataset characteristics. The use of chrominance channels enables the preservation of subtle manipulation artifacts, while multiscale texture representation enhances feature discrimination. The proposed framework demonstrates competitive performance compared to existing methods while maintaining moderate computational complexity, making it suitable for practical image authentication tasks.
SN  - 3068-6679
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Ali2026Passive,
  author = {Aamir Ali and Aamir Raza and Khaleelullah Syed and Swetank Mohan and Nikhat Fatima and Muhammad Umar and Misbah Ali},
  title = {Passive Image Forgery Detection Using Multiscale Weber Local Descriptor and SVM Classification},
  journal = {ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {69-91},
  doi = {10.62762/JIAP.2026.490874},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JIAP.2026.490874},
  abstract = {Digital image manipulation has become increasingly prevalent with the widespread availability of editing tools, raising concerns regarding image authenticity in critical applications. This study presents a passive image forgery detection framework based on multiscale Weber Local Descriptor features extracted from chrominance components and classified using a Support Vector Machine. The proposed method operates without embedded authentication information and focuses on detecting both copy-move and splicing forgeries through texture-based analysis. Experiments were conducted on two benchmark datasets, CASIA v2.0 and MICC F2000, using ten-fold cross-validation. On the CASIA v2.0 dataset, the framework achieved an overall classification accuracy of 97.0\%, with a true positive rate of 98.4\% for spliced images and an area under the ROC curve of 0.98. On the MICC F2000 dataset, the framework achieved an overall accuracy of 97.4\%, with a true positive rate of 99.7\% for copy-move forgery detection and an AUC value of 0.98. The results indicate consistent classification performance across different manipulation types and dataset characteristics. The use of chrominance channels enables the preservation of subtle manipulation artifacts, while multiscale texture representation enhances feature discrimination. The proposed framework demonstrates competitive performance compared to existing methods while maintaining moderate computational complexity, making it suitable for practical image authentication tasks.},
  keywords = {digital image forgery detection, passive image authentication, copy-move forgery, image splicing, weber local descriptor, multiscale texture analysis, chroma analysis, support vector machine},
  issn = {3068-6679},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
718
PDF Downloads
207

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing
ICCK Journal of Image Analysis and Processing
ISSN: 3068-6679 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico