Artificial Flirtation and Synthetic Affection: What Does Generation X Feel When a Conversational AI Flirts with Them?
Article Information
Abstract
This innovative study analyzes the emotional reaction of 27 individuals from Generation X to flirtatious behaviors exhibited by conversational artificial intelligence. Using a quantitative methodology based on Sentiment Analysis, testimonies and experiences with three models—ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini—were collected, focusing on phrases or linguistic gestures that could be considered seductive, empathetic, or emotionally warm. The results show that, although there is a clear awareness that no person is behind the AI, several responses generated feelings of companionship, affective validation, and even mild attachment, especially in moments of emotional vulnerability—very difficult to express in this generational cohort. Women reported greater discomfort with unsolicited artificial flirtation, while some men experienced it as a gentle curiosity or a complementary activity. This phenomenon raises important questions about the ethics of emotional AI design, gender biases embedded in LLM models, and how intermediate generations who did not grow up with AI, but now use it, reinterpret affection and connection. In a world increasingly mediated by algorithms, asking whether a flirtatious AI emotionally affects the user is not trivial: it is urgent and requires an accurate diagnosis.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2017). Social cognition: From brains to culture. SAGE Publications.
[Google Scholar] - Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
[Google Scholar] - Curry, A. C., Robertson, J., & Rieser, V. (2020, December). Conversational assistants and gender stereotypes: Public perceptions and desiderata for voice personas. In Proceedings of the second workshop on gender bias in natural language processing (pp. 72-78). https://aclanthology.org/2020.gebnlp-1.7/
[Google Scholar] - Shah, M. M., & Kavathiya, H. R. (2024). Unveiling the future: Exploring conversational AI. In Artificial intelligence in education: The power and dangers of ChatGPT in the classroom (pp. 511-526). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Narimisaei, J., Naeim, M., Imannezhad, S., Samian, P., & Sobhani, M. (2024). Exploring emotional intelligence in artificial intelligence systems: a comprehensive analysis of emotion recognition and response mechanisms. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 86(8), 4657-4663.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wu, T. (2024). AI Love: An Analysis of Virtual Intimacy in Human-Computer Interaction. Communications in Humanities Research, 50(1), 143-148.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Lee, M., Lee, G.-E., Lee, S. H., & Lee, J.-H. (2024). Emotional Responses of Korean and Chinese Women to Hangul Phonemes to the Gender of an Artificial Intelligence Voice. Frontiers in Psychology.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Yin, Y., Jia, N., & Wakslak, C. J. (2024). AI can help people feel heard, but an AI label diminishes this impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(14), e2319112121.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Kumar, S., & Bargavi, S. (2024). Trust’s Significance in Human-AI Communication and Decision-Making. IJSREM, 8, 1-10.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Tey, K. S., Mazar, A., Tomaino, G., Duckworth, A. L., & Ungar, L. H. (2024). People judge others more harshly after talking to bots. PNAS nexus, 3(9), pgae397.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Gaikwad Anil Pandurang, Kakpure Krutika Balram, Gawali Ravindra Bhaskar, Jadhav Meenakshi Pramod, Tambe Prashant Radhakrishna. (2023). Impact of AI on Human Psychology. European Economic Letters (EEL), 13(3), 1268–1276.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Shukla, A., Algnihotri, A., & Singh, B. (2023). Analyzing how AI and emotional intelligence affect Indian IT professional’s decision-making. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology, 9, 1-13.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Mlonyeni, P. M. T. (2025). Personal AI, deception, and the problem of emotional bubbles. AI & society, 40(3), 1927-1938.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Cover, R. (2023). Identity and digital communication: Concepts, theories, practices. Routledge.
[Google Scholar] - Bhardwaj, S., Jain, V., Mahapatra, D., & Sindhwani, R. (2025). Exploring the dark side of AI and its influence on consumer emotion. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(2), 529-544.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Merrill Jr, K., Kim, J., & Collins, C. (2022). AI companions for lonely individuals and the role of social presence. Communication Research Reports, 39(2), 93-103.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Abadi, M. A., Arraki, R., Podara, A., Ghazaryan, T., & Mufid, A. (2023). The turning point of civilization: Sociological perspective toward artificial intelligence on modern humanity. Simulacra, 6(2), 293-310.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Depounti, I., Saukko, P., & Natale, S. (2023). Ideal technologies, ideal women: AI and gender imaginaries in Redditors’ discussions on the Replika bot girlfriend. Media, Culture & Society, 45(4), 720-736.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Bozdağ, A. A. (2024). The AI-mediated intimacy economy: a paradigm shift in digital interactions. AI & SOCIETY, 1-22.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017, February). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 31, No. 1).
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wang, B., Zhang, R., Xue, B., Zhao, Y., Yang, L., & Liang, H. (2024). Automatically distinguishing people’s explicit and implicit attitude bias by bridging psychological measurements with sentiment analysis on large corpora. Applied Sciences, 14(10), 4191.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT Technical Report. OpenAI. Retrieved from https://openai.com/research
[Google Scholar] - Anthropic. (2024). Understanding Constitutional AI in Claude. Anthropic. Retrieved from https://www.anthropic.com
[Google Scholar] - Google DeepMind. (2024). Gemini Technical Whitepaper. Google. Retrieved from https://deepmind.google
[Google Scholar]
Cited By (1)
-
Wenzheng Dai, Zhanhui Zhang, Zhixin Zhang, Huashuo Zhu. YOLOv8-GSC: An agricultural crop precision detection model integrating lightweight network and attention mechanism.
Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2026 , 145 .
[CrossRef]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR AU - Ochoa-Zezzatti, Alberto AU - Contreras-Masse, Roberto AU - Contreras-Moheno, Roberto PY - 2025 DA - 2025/11/02 TI - Artificial Flirtation and Synthetic Affection: What Does Generation X Feel When a Conversational AI Flirts with Them? JO - ICCK Transactions on Emerging Topics in Artificial Intelligence T2 - ICCK Transactions on Emerging Topics in Artificial Intelligence JF - ICCK Transactions on Emerging Topics in Artificial Intelligence VL - 2 IS - 4 SP - 220 EP - 228 DO - 10.62762/TETAI.2025.851867 UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TETAI.2025.851867 KW - artificial flirtation KW - conversational AI KW - digital attachment KW - generation X KW - technological affectivity AB - This innovative study analyzes the emotional reaction of 27 individuals from Generation X to flirtatious behaviors exhibited by conversational artificial intelligence. Using a quantitative methodology based on Sentiment Analysis, testimonies and experiences with three models—ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini—were collected, focusing on phrases or linguistic gestures that could be considered seductive, empathetic, or emotionally warm. The results show that, although there is a clear awareness that no person is behind the AI, several responses generated feelings of companionship, affective validation, and even mild attachment, especially in moments of emotional vulnerability—very difficult to express in this generational cohort. Women reported greater discomfort with unsolicited artificial flirtation, while some men experienced it as a gentle curiosity or a complementary activity. This phenomenon raises important questions about the ethics of emotional AI design, gender biases embedded in LLM models, and how intermediate generations who did not grow up with AI, but now use it, reinterpret affection and connection. In a world increasingly mediated by algorithms, asking whether a flirtatious AI emotionally affects the user is not trivial: it is urgent and requires an accurate diagnosis. SN - 3068-6652 PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge LA - English ER -
@article{OchoaZezzatti2025Artificial,
author = {Alberto Ochoa-Zezzatti and Roberto Contreras-Masse and Roberto Contreras-Moheno},
title = {Artificial Flirtation and Synthetic Affection: What Does Generation X Feel When a Conversational AI Flirts with Them?},
journal = {ICCK Transactions on Emerging Topics in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2025},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {220-228},
doi = {10.62762/TETAI.2025.851867},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TETAI.2025.851867},
abstract = {This innovative study analyzes the emotional reaction of 27 individuals from Generation X to flirtatious behaviors exhibited by conversational artificial intelligence. Using a quantitative methodology based on Sentiment Analysis, testimonies and experiences with three models—ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini—were collected, focusing on phrases or linguistic gestures that could be considered seductive, empathetic, or emotionally warm. The results show that, although there is a clear awareness that no person is behind the AI, several responses generated feelings of companionship, affective validation, and even mild attachment, especially in moments of emotional vulnerability—very difficult to express in this generational cohort. Women reported greater discomfort with unsolicited artificial flirtation, while some men experienced it as a gentle curiosity or a complementary activity. This phenomenon raises important questions about the ethics of emotional AI design, gender biases embedded in LLM models, and how intermediate generations who did not grow up with AI, but now use it, reinterpret affection and connection. In a world increasingly mediated by algorithms, asking whether a flirtatious AI emotionally affects the user is not trivial: it is urgent and requires an accurate diagnosis.},
keywords = {artificial flirtation, conversational AI, digital attachment, generation X, technological affectivity},
issn = {3068-6652},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Portico