Reliability Assessment and Optimization of Multi-State Aggregated Grid Systems Based on V2G Technology
Article Information
Abstract
In recent years, while the rapid development of global electric vehicles (EVs) has been driving energy transition, their large-scale integration into power grids has posed significant challenges to the stability of power systems and the reliability of electricity supply. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology demonstrates potential in balancing grid peak-valley differences and facilitating renewable energy integration, thereby effectively mitigating issues caused by disorderly grid integration of massive EVs. This paper proposes a “Vehicle-to-Station-to-Grid” (VSG) aggregated system based on V2G technology. In this system, the multi-state stochastic power output and demand of EVs are considered. Power generated by an EV is allocated to other EVs in need through power transmission lines with transmission losses and capacity constraints. This achieves dynamic power distribution within the “Vehicle-to-Station” Subsystem (VSS). A reliability evaluation model for the VSS is established using the universal generating function (UGF) method. An electric vehicle aggregator (EVA) is introduced as an energy storage container to enable bidirectional power interaction between the VSS and the grid subsystem. This further establishes the reliability model of the VSG aggregation system. This paper specifically analyzes two scenarios: with and without transmission losses. The effectiveness of the reliability models for the VSS and the VSG aggregation system is verified through theoretical derivation and numerical examples. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to clarify the impact of transmission losses on reliability. Finally, a goal programming model is established under constraints, and an optimization strategy for EVs based on a power-sharing mechanism is proposed within the VSG aggregation system.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
AI Use Statement
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Levitin, G. (2011). Reliability of multi-state systems with common bus performance sharing. IIE Transactions, 43(7), 518-524.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Zhao, X., Wu, C., Wang, S., & Wang, X. (2018). Reliability analysis of multi-state k-out-of-n: G system with common bus performance sharing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 124, 359-369.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wang, G., Duan, F., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Reliability evaluation of multi-state series systems with performance sharing. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 173, 58-63.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Qiu, S., & Ming, H. X. (2019). Reliability evaluation of multi-state series-parallel systems with common bus performance sharing considering transmission loss. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 189, 406-415.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Peng, R. (2019). Optimal component allocation in a multi-state system with hierarchical performance sharing groups. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(4), 581-587.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Su, P., Wang, G., & Duan, F. (2020). Reliability evaluation of a k-out-of-n (G)-subsystem based multi-state system with common bus performance sharing. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 198, 106884.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Jia, H., Liu, D., Li, Y., Ding, Y., Liu, M., & Peng, R. (2020). Reliability evaluation of power systems with multi-state warm standby and multi-state performance sharing mechanism. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 204, 107139.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Bhatt, V., & Singh, S. B. (2025). Availability analysis of phase mission weighted components system with common bus performance sharing. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 260, 111024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Xiao, H., Cao, M., Kou, G., & Yuan, X. (2021). Optimal element allocation and sequencing of multi-state series systems with two levels of performance sharing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 235(2), 282-292.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Cheng, C., Yang, J., & Li, L. (2021). Reliability evaluation of a k-out-of-n (G)-subsystem based multi-state phased mission system with common bus performance sharing subjected to common cause failures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216, 108003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Su, P., Wang, G., & Duan, F. (2021). Reliability analysis for k-out-of-(n+ 1): G star configuration multi-state systems with performance sharing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 152, 106991.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Yi, K., Xiao, H., Kou, G., & Peng, R. (2019). Trade-off between maintenance and protection for multi-state performance sharing systems with transmission loss. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 305-315.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Azhdari, A., & Ardakan, M. A. (2022). Reliability optimization of multi-state networks in a star configuration with bi-level performance sharing mechanism and transmission losses. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 226, 108556.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wu, C., Pan, R., & Zhao, X. (2022). Reliability assessment of multi-state performance sharing systems with transmission loss and random shocks. IISE Transactions, 54(11), 1060-1071.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wu, C., Zhao, X., Wang, S., & Song, Y. (2025). Reliability analysis of weighted k-out-of-n: G performance sharing systems with multiple transmission loss levels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 257, 110859.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Gu, L., Wang, G., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Reliability analysis and optimization of multi-state tree-structured systems with performance sharing mechanism. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 260, 110990.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Liu, J., Zhuge, C., Tang, J. H. C. G., Meng, M., & Zhang, J. (2022). A spatial agent-based joint model of electric vehicle and vehicle-to-grid adoption: A case of Beijing. Applied Energy, 310, 118581.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Ma, S. C., Fan, Y., Yao, X., Fang, H., & Xu, C. (2025). Cost and environmental impacts assessment of electric vehicles and power systems synergy: The role of vehicle-to-grid technology. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 114, 107899.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Peng, C. (2019). Charge park vehicle-to-grid service: Modeling, control, and optimization (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska–Lincoln). ETD Collection for University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Digital Commons UNL. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI13902940
[Google Scholar] - Lee, W., Woo, J., Kim, Y. G., & Koo, Y. (2024). Vehicle-to-grid as a competitive alternative to energy storage in a renewable-dominant power system: An integrated approach considering both electric vehicle drivers' willingness and effectiveness. Energy, 310, 133194.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Sagaria, S., Van Der Kam, M., & Boström, T. (2024). The influence of socio-technical variables on vehicle-to-grid technology. Energy, 305, 132299.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Liu, F., Wei, Z., Lin, Y., Huang, X., Li, Y., Huang, Y., & Lim, M. K. (2025). Vehicle‐To‐Grid Technology Acceptance for Electric Vehicle Users: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(3), e70065.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Su, P., Yang, X., Peng, R., Hu, L., & Li, T. (2026). Reliability analysis of multi-state aggregation power grid systems under the Vehicle-to-Grid mode. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 112446.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Comi, A., & Elnour, E. (2024). Challenges for implementing vehicle-to-grid services in parking lots: A state of the art. Energies, 17(24), 6240.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Du, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, H., Ji, H., ... & Yan, J. (2025). Impact of electric vehicles on post-disaster power supply restoration of urban distribution systems. Applied Energy, 383, 125302.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Kouzelis, A., Linders, K., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Mouli, G. R. C. (2025). Analysis of vehicle-integrated photovoltaics and vehicle-to-grid on electric vehicle battery life. Journal of Power Sources, 631, 236117.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Li, T., Tao, S., He, K., Lu, M., Xie, B., Yang, B., & Sun, Y. (2021). V2G multi-objective dispatching optimization strategy based on user behavior model. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 739527.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Prencipe, L. P., Van Essen, J. T., Caggiani, L., Ottomanelli, M., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2022). A mathematical programming model for optimal fleet management of electric car-sharing systems with vehicle-to-grid operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133147.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Shaheen, H. I., Rashed, G. I., Yang, B., & Yang, J. (2024). Optimal electric vehicle charging and discharging scheduling using metaheuristic algorithms: V2G approach for cost reduction and grid support. Journal of Energy Storage, 90, 111816.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Liu, K., Liu, Y., Si, G., Lu, X., & Xie, Y. (2025). Punctual V2G scheduling circle: Evaluate and enhance transfer V2G capability through adaptive redistribution. Applied Energy, 383, 125290.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Zhang, H., Hu, Z., Xu, Z., & Song, Y. (2016). Evaluation of achievable vehicle-to-grid capacity using aggregate PEV model. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(1), 784-794.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR AU - Yang, Xu AU - Su, Peng AU - Dong, Yuzhe PY - 2026 DA - 2026/05/11 TI - Reliability Assessment and Optimization of Multi-State Aggregated Grid Systems Based on V2G Technology JO - ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability T2 - ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability JF - ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability VL - 2 IS - 2 SP - 123 EP - 139 DO - 10.62762/TSSR.2026.977328 UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TSSR.2026.977328 KW - vehicle-to-grid KW - multi-state systems KW - power sharing KW - reliability AB - In recent years, while the rapid development of global electric vehicles (EVs) has been driving energy transition, their large-scale integration into power grids has posed significant challenges to the stability of power systems and the reliability of electricity supply. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology demonstrates potential in balancing grid peak-valley differences and facilitating renewable energy integration, thereby effectively mitigating issues caused by disorderly grid integration of massive EVs. This paper proposes a “Vehicle-to-Station-to-Grid” (VSG) aggregated system based on V2G technology. In this system, the multi-state stochastic power output and demand of EVs are considered. Power generated by an EV is allocated to other EVs in need through power transmission lines with transmission losses and capacity constraints. This achieves dynamic power distribution within the “Vehicle-to-Station” Subsystem (VSS). A reliability evaluation model for the VSS is established using the universal generating function (UGF) method. An electric vehicle aggregator (EVA) is introduced as an energy storage container to enable bidirectional power interaction between the VSS and the grid subsystem. This further establishes the reliability model of the VSG aggregation system. This paper specifically analyzes two scenarios: with and without transmission losses. The effectiveness of the reliability models for the VSS and the VSG aggregation system is verified through theoretical derivation and numerical examples. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to clarify the impact of transmission losses on reliability. Finally, a goal programming model is established under constraints, and an optimization strategy for EVs based on a power-sharing mechanism is proposed within the VSG aggregation system. SN - 3069-1087 PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge LA - English ER -
@article{Yang2026Reliabilit,
author = {Xu Yang and Peng Su and Yuzhe Dong},
title = {Reliability Assessment and Optimization of Multi-State Aggregated Grid Systems Based on V2G Technology},
journal = {ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability},
year = {2026},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {123-139},
doi = {10.62762/TSSR.2026.977328},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TSSR.2026.977328},
abstract = {In recent years, while the rapid development of global electric vehicles (EVs) has been driving energy transition, their large-scale integration into power grids has posed significant challenges to the stability of power systems and the reliability of electricity supply. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology demonstrates potential in balancing grid peak-valley differences and facilitating renewable energy integration, thereby effectively mitigating issues caused by disorderly grid integration of massive EVs. This paper proposes a “Vehicle-to-Station-to-Grid” (VSG) aggregated system based on V2G technology. In this system, the multi-state stochastic power output and demand of EVs are considered. Power generated by an EV is allocated to other EVs in need through power transmission lines with transmission losses and capacity constraints. This achieves dynamic power distribution within the “Vehicle-to-Station” Subsystem (VSS). A reliability evaluation model for the VSS is established using the universal generating function (UGF) method. An electric vehicle aggregator (EVA) is introduced as an energy storage container to enable bidirectional power interaction between the VSS and the grid subsystem. This further establishes the reliability model of the VSG aggregation system. This paper specifically analyzes two scenarios: with and without transmission losses. The effectiveness of the reliability models for the VSS and the VSG aggregation system is verified through theoretical derivation and numerical examples. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to clarify the impact of transmission losses on reliability. Finally, a goal programming model is established under constraints, and an optimization strategy for EVs based on a power-sharing mechanism is proposed within the VSG aggregation system.},
keywords = {vehicle-to-grid, multi-state systems, power sharing, reliability},
issn = {3069-1087},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Article Metrics
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Portico