A Systematic Review of Methods Used to Monitor and Predict Agricultural, Hydrological, and Meteorological Droughts
Review Article  ·  Published: 12 June 2026
Issue cover
Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2026: 69-84
Review Article Open Access

A Systematic Review of Methods Used to Monitor and Predict Agricultural, Hydrological, and Meteorological Droughts

1 Scientific Research Centre, Soran University, Soran 44008, Iraq
2 Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, Soran University, Soran 44008, Iraq
3 Department of Forestry, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Erbil 44002, Iraq
* Corresponding Author: Azad Rasul, [email protected]
Volume 1, Issue 1

Article Information

Abstract

Droughts are among the most economically and ecologically destructive natural hazards, affecting more than half of the world's land surface annually and increasing in frequency and severity under anthropogenic climate change. Unlike episodic disasters such as earthquakes or hurricanes, droughts develop gradually and their full impacts may not be evident until months or years after peak conditions. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge of drought monitoring and prediction methods, encompassing approximately 27 drought indices—spanning meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and remote sensing categories—and six major classes of prediction model: regression, time series, probabilistic, hybrid, machine learning, and deep learning. A structured literature search was performed across the Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Following PRISMA-aligned screening, 95 primary studies were included. Results indicate that no single index performs optimally across all drought types, climates, or timescales. Multi-variable indices that integrate precipitation, evapotranspiration, and remote sensing data outperform univariate indices in complex settings. Among prediction models, hybrid architectures—most notably ARIMA-LSTM and wavelet-ANN combinations—consistently outperform individual models on both short- and long-term forecasting tasks, while deep learning approaches show strong potential but require large training datasets. Key research gaps include the limited integration of climate teleconnection indices into operational forecasting systems, the absence of standardised benchmarking across drought prediction studies, and the need for improved spatio-temporal modelling frameworks. This review provides a foundation for researchers and practitioners developing next-generation drought early warning systems.

Keywords

drought monitoring drought prediction drought indices machine learning remote sensing ENSO climate variability

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2011). Drought modeling–A review. Journal of Hydrology, 403(1-2), 157-175.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guha-Sapir, D., Vos, F., Below, R., & Ponserre, S. (2012). Annual disaster statistical review 2011: The numbers and trends. CRED. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/203598
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai, A. (2011). Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1), 45-65.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Spinoni, J., Barbosa, P., Bucchignani, E., Cassano, J., Cavazos, T., Christensen, J. H., ... & Dosio, A. (2020). Future global meteorological drought hot spots: a study based on CORDEX data. Journal of Climate, 33(9), 3635-3661.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhong, F., Cheng, Q., & Wang, P. (2020). Meteorological drought, hydrological drought, and NDVI in the Heihe River basin, Northwest China: evolution and propagation. Advances in Meteorology, 2020(1), 2409068.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hao, Z., Singh, V. P., & Xia, Y. (2018). Seasonal drought prediction: Advances, challenges, and future prospects. Reviews of Geophysics, 56(1), 108-141.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rahman, G., Khalid, S., Arshad, S., Moazzam, M. F. U., & Kwon, H. H. (2025). Remote sensing-based spatiotemporal assessment of agricultural drought and its impact on crop yields in Punjab, Pakistan. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 20586.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H. (1985). Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water international, 10(3), 111-120.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, B., Zhou, X., Li, W., Lu, C., & Shu, L. (2016). Spatiotemporal characteristics of groundwater drought and its response to meteorological drought in Jiangsu Province, China. Water, 8(11), 480.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Senay, G. B., Velpuri, N. M., Bohms, S., Budde, M., Young, C., Rowland, J., & Verdin, J. P. (2015). Drought monitoring and assessment: remote sensing and modeling approaches for the famine early warning systems network. In Hydro-meteorological hazards, risks and disasters (pp. 233-262). Elsevier.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Winkler, K., Gessner, U., & Hochschild, V. (2017). Identifying droughts affecting agriculture in Africa based on remote sensing time series between 2000–2016: rainfall anomalies and vegetation condition in the context of ENSO. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 831.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Anshuka, A., van Ogtrop, F. F., & Willem Vervoort, R. (2019). Drought forecasting through statistical models using standardised precipitation index: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Natural Hazards, 97(2), 955-977.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. World Meteorological Organization. (2023). Atlas of mortality and economic losses from weather, climate and water-related hazards (1970–2021). World Meteorological Organization.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yihdego, Y., Vaheddoost, B., & Al-Weshah, R. A. (2019). Drought indices and indicators revisited. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(3), 69.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shiru, M. S., Shahid, S., Dewan, A., Chung, E. S., Alias, N., Ahmed, K., & Hassan, Q. K. (2020). Projection of meteorological droughts in Nigeria during growing seasons under climate change scenarios. Scientific reports, 10(1), 10107.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Özger, M., Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2009). Low frequency drought variability associated with climate indices. Journal of Hydrology, 364(1-2), 152-162.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schubert, S. D., Stewart, R. E., Wang, H., Barlow, M., Berbery, E. H., Cai, W., ... & Zhou, T. (2016). Global meteorological drought: a synthesis of current understanding with a focus on SST drivers of precipitation deficits. Journal of Climate, 29(11), 3989-4019.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Almamalachy, Y. (2017). Utilization of remote sensing in drought monitoring over Iraq [Master's thesis, Portland State University].
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., ... & van Ypserle, J. P. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ipcc. http://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.45156.d001
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Du, T. L. T., Bui, D. D., Nguyen, M. D., & Lee, H. (2018). Satellite-based, multi-indices for evaluation of agricultural droughts in a highly dynamic tropical catchment, Central Vietnam. Water, 10(5), 659.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Şen, Z. (2015). Applied drought modeling, prediction, and mitigation. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, M., Gu, Q., Jia, X., & Ge, J. (2019). An assessment of the impact of Pacific Decadal Oscillation on autumn droughts in North China based on the Palmer drought severity index. International Journal of Climatology, 39(14), 5338-5350.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamruzzaman, M., Hwang, S., Cho, J., Jang, M. W., & Jeong, H. (2019). Evaluating the spatiotemporal characteristics of agricultural drought in Bangladesh using effective drought index. Water, 11(12), 2437.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Svoboda, M. D., & Fuchs, B. A. (2016). Handbook of drought indicators and indices (Vol. 2). Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Brown, M. E., Pinzón, J. E., Didan, K., Morisette, J. T., & Tucker, C. J. (2006). Evaluation of the consistency of long-term NDVI time series derived from AVHRR, SPOT-vegetation, SeaWiFS, MODIS, and Landsat ETM+ sensors. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 44(7), 1787-1793.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Belayneh, A., Adamowski, J., Khalil, B., & Ozga-Zielinski, B. J. J. O. H. (2014). Long-term SPI drought forecasting in the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using wavelet neural network and wavelet support vector regression models. Journal of Hydrology, 508, 418-429.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bouaziz, M., Abid, M. A., Medhioub, E., & John, A. (2025). A Century of Data: Machine Learning Approaches to Drought Prediction and Trend Analysis in Arid Regions. Water, 17(24), 3567.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote sensing of environment, 83(1-2), 195-213.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, W. T., & Kogan, F. N. (1996). Monitoring regional drought using the vegetation condition index. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(14), 2761-2782.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Narasimhan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2005). Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 133(1-4), 69-88.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Doesken, N. J., McKee, T. B., & Kleist, J. (1991). Development of a surface water supply index for the Western United States: Final report. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University. http://hdl.handle.net/10217/170249
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Chandrasekar, K., Sesha Sai, M. V. R., Roy, P. S., & Dwevedi, R. S. (2010). Land Surface Water Index (LSWI) response to rainfall and NDVI using the MODIS Vegetation Index product. International journal of remote sensing, 31(15), 3987-4005.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, A., & Jia, G. (2013). Monitoring meteorological drought in semiarid regions using multi-sensor microwave remote sensing data. Remote sensing of Environment, 134, 12-23.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hamarash, H., Rasul, A., & Hamad, R. (2024). A Novel Index for Agricultural Drought Measurement: Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration Revealed Drought Index (SERDI). Climate, 12(12), 209.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Danandeh Mehr, A., Ghavifekr, A. A., Ghazaei, E., Safari, M. J. S., Ke, C. Q., & Nourani, V. (2025). S-Transformer: a new deep learning model enhanced by sequential transformer encoders for drought forecasting. Earth Science Informatics, 18(2), 341.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, S., Huang, Q., Chang, J., & Leng, G. (2016). Linkages between hydrological drought, climate indices and human activities: a case study in the Columbia River basin. International Journal of Climatology, 36(1), 280-290.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kassahun, T. A., Kerebih, M. S., & Hailu, D. A. (2025). Characterization of drought detection with remote sensing-based multiple indices and SPEI in northeastern Ethiopian highland. Air, Soil and Water Research, 18, 1–15.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kogan, F. N. (1995). Droughts of the late 1980s in the United States as derived from NOAA polar-orbiting satellite data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 76(5), 655-668.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lakshmi, V., Kir, E. G., Kir, A., & Fang, B. (2025). Remote Sensing-Based Monitoring of Agricultural Drought and Irrigation Adaptation Strategies in the Antalya Basin, Türkiye. Hydrology, 12(11), 288.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, M., Yao, Y., Feng, Z., & Ou, M. (2025). Hydrological drought prediction and its influencing features analysis based on a machine learning model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 25(11), 4299-4316.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, N. K., Chang, A., & Sherman, D. (2025). Forecasting Drought Using Machine Learning in California. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08622.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mishra, A. K., & Desai, V. R. (2006). Drought forecasting using feed-forward recursive neural network. Ecological modelling, 198(1-2), 127-138.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mokhtarzad, M., Eskandari, F., Jamshidi Vanjani, N., & Arabasadi, A. (2017). Drought forecasting by ANN, ANFIS, and SVM and comparison of the models. Environmental earth sciences, 76(21), 729.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Morid, S., Smakhtin, V., & Bagherzadeh, K. (2007). Drought forecasting using artificial neural networks and time series of drought indices. International Journal of climatology, 27(15), 2103-2112.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Norel, M., Kałczyński, M., Pińskwar, I., Krawiec, K., & Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2021). Climate variability indices—a guided tour. Geosciences, 11(3), 128.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pathania, A., & Gupta, V. (2025). Interpretable transformer model for national scale drought forecasting: Attention-driven insights across India. Environmental Modelling & Software, 187, 106394.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pathania, A., & Gupta, V. (2026). Transfer learning for transformer‐based drought forecasting across diverse precipitation products in India. Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation, 3(2), e2025JH001216.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sigdel, M., & Ikeda, M. (2010). Spatial and temporal analysis of drought in Nepal using standardized precipitation index and its relationship with climate indices. Journal of Hydrology and Meteorology, 7(1), 59-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wambura, F. J. (2021). Sensitivity of the evapotranspiration deficit index to its parameters and different temporal scales. Hydrology, 8(1), 26.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Xanthopoulos, G., Maheras, G., Gouma, V., & Gouvas, M. (2006). Is the Keetch–Byram drought index (KBDI) directly related to plant water stress?. Forest Ecology and Management, 234, S27-S27.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, D., Zhang, Q., Ding, Y., & Zhang, D. (2022). Application of a hybrid ARIMA-LSTM model based on the SPEI for drought forecasting. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4128-4144.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, Y., Li, W., Chen, Q., Pu, X., & Xiang, L. (2017). Multi-models for SPI drought forecasting in the north of Haihe River Basin, China. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 31(10), 2471-2481.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Hamarash, H. R., Rasul, A., & Hamad, R. (2026). A Systematic Review of Methods Used to Monitor and Predict Agricultural, Hydrological, and Meteorological Droughts. Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation, 1(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.62762/JGEO.2026.930918
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hamarash, Hushiar Raheem
AU  - Rasul, Azad
AU  - Hamad, Rahel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/12
TI  - A Systematic Review of Methods Used to Monitor and Predict Agricultural, Hydrological, and Meteorological Droughts
JO  - Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation
T2  - Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation
JF  - Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SP  - 69
EP  - 84
DO  - 10.62762/JGEO.2026.930918
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JGEO.2026.930918
KW  - drought monitoring
KW  - drought prediction
KW  - drought indices
KW  - machine learning
KW  - remote sensing
KW  - ENSO
KW  - climate variability
AB  - Droughts are among the most economically and ecologically destructive natural hazards, affecting more than half of the world's land surface annually and increasing in frequency and severity under anthropogenic climate change. Unlike episodic disasters such as earthquakes or hurricanes, droughts develop gradually and their full impacts may not be evident until months or years after peak conditions. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge of drought monitoring and prediction methods, encompassing approximately 27 drought indices—spanning meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and remote sensing categories—and six major classes of prediction model: regression, time series, probabilistic, hybrid, machine learning, and deep learning. A structured literature search was performed across the Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Following PRISMA-aligned screening, 95 primary studies were included. Results indicate that no single index performs optimally across all drought types, climates, or timescales. Multi-variable indices that integrate precipitation, evapotranspiration, and remote sensing data outperform univariate indices in complex settings. Among prediction models, hybrid architectures—most notably ARIMA-LSTM and wavelet-ANN combinations—consistently outperform individual models on both short- and long-term forecasting tasks, while deep learning approaches show strong potential but require large training datasets. Key research gaps include the limited integration of climate teleconnection indices into operational forecasting systems, the absence of standardised benchmarking across drought prediction studies, and the need for improved spatio-temporal modelling frameworks. This review provides a foundation for researchers and practitioners developing next-generation drought early warning systems.
SN  - pending
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Hamarash2026A,
  author = {Hushiar Raheem Hamarash and Azad Rasul and Rahel Hamad},
  title = {A Systematic Review of Methods Used to Monitor and Predict Agricultural, Hydrological, and Meteorological Droughts},
  journal = {Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {69-84},
  doi = {10.62762/JGEO.2026.930918},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JGEO.2026.930918},
  abstract = {Droughts are among the most economically and ecologically destructive natural hazards, affecting more than half of the world's land surface annually and increasing in frequency and severity under anthropogenic climate change. Unlike episodic disasters such as earthquakes or hurricanes, droughts develop gradually and their full impacts may not be evident until months or years after peak conditions. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge of drought monitoring and prediction methods, encompassing approximately 27 drought indices—spanning meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and remote sensing categories—and six major classes of prediction model: regression, time series, probabilistic, hybrid, machine learning, and deep learning. A structured literature search was performed across the Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Following PRISMA-aligned screening, 95 primary studies were included. Results indicate that no single index performs optimally across all drought types, climates, or timescales. Multi-variable indices that integrate precipitation, evapotranspiration, and remote sensing data outperform univariate indices in complex settings. Among prediction models, hybrid architectures—most notably ARIMA-LSTM and wavelet-ANN combinations—consistently outperform individual models on both short- and long-term forecasting tasks, while deep learning approaches show strong potential but require large training datasets. Key research gaps include the limited integration of climate teleconnection indices into operational forecasting systems, the absence of standardised benchmarking across drought prediction studies, and the need for improved spatio-temporal modelling frameworks. This review provides a foundation for researchers and practitioners developing next-generation drought early warning systems.},
  keywords = {drought monitoring, drought prediction, drought indices, machine learning, remote sensing, ENSO, climate variability},
  issn = {pending},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
617
PDF Downloads
202

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation
Journal of Geoscience and Earth Observation
ISSN: pending (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico