Beyond the Breadbasket Paradox : Rethinking Agricultural Adaptation in the Age of Climate Coloniality
Article Information
Abstract
The commentary critiques Hultgren et al.'s "breadbasket paradox," asserting that limited adaptation in wealthy agricultural regions stems from systemic issues linked to climate coloniality, advocating for a decolonial, justice-focused approach to reframe agricultural adaptation under climate change.
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Abram, N. J., Henley, B. J., Sen Gupta, A., Lippmann, T. J., Clarke, H., Dowdy, A. J., ... & Boer, M. M. (2021). Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia. Communications Earth & Environment, 2(1), 8.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Agrawal, A. (2010). Local institutions and adaptation to climate change. Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, 2, 173-178.
[Google Scholar] - Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for sustainable development, 35(3), 869-890.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Beillouin, D., Ben‐Ari, T., Malézieux, E., Seufert, V., & Makowski, D. (2021). Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Global change biology, 27(19), 4697-4710.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Bebber, D. P., Ramotowski, M. A., & Gurr, S. J. (2013). Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nature climate change, 3(11), 985-988.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Borras Jr, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2012). Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of agrarian change, 12(1), 34-59.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Barbosa, I. P. (2020). Speculative Harvests: financialization, food and agriculture. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política.
[Google Scholar] - Eriksen, S., Schipper, E. L. F., Scoville-Simonds, M., Vincent, K., Adam, H. N., Brooks, N., ... & West, J. J. (2021). Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance?. World development, 141, 105383.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Gleeson, T., Cuthbert, M., Ferguson, G., & Perrone, D. (2020). Global groundwater sustainability, resources, and systems in the Anthropocene. Annual review of earth and planetary sciences, 48(2020), 431-463.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Hallegatte, S., Fay, M., & Barbier, E. B. (2018). Poverty and climate change: Introduction. Environment and development economics, 23(3), 217-233.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Nicolétis, É., Caron, P., El Solh, M., Cole, M., Fresco, L. O., Godoy-Faúndez, A., ... & Zurayk, R. (2019). Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security.
[Google Scholar] - Hultgren, A., Carleton, T., Delgado, M., Gergel, D. R., Greenstone, M., Houser, T., ... & Yuan, J. (2025). Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting for adaptation. Nature, 642(8068), 644-652.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Van de Wouw, M., Kik, C., van Hintum, T., van Treuren, R., & Visser, B. (2010). Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges. Plant genetic resources, 8(1), 1-15.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Adil, L., Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., & Schäfer, L. (2025). Climate risk index 2025.
[Google Scholar] - Smith, P. (2004). Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context. European journal of agronomy, 20(3), 229-236.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Myers, S. S., Zanobetti, A., Kloog, I., Huybers, P., Leakey, A. D., Bloom, A. J., ... & Usui, Y. (2014). Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature, 510(7503), 139-142.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Peschard, K., & Randeria, S. (2020). ‘Keeping seeds in our hands’: the rise of seed activism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4), 613-647.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Rader, R., Bartomeus, I., Tylianakis, J. M., & Laliberté, E. (2014). The winners and losers of land use intensification: Pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity. Diversity and Distributions, 20(8), 908-917.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Raworth, K. (2018). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
[Google Scholar] - Ribot, J. (2017). Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. In New Directions in Agrarian Political Economy (pp. 27-66). Routledge.
[Google Scholar] - Scheelbeek, P. F., Bird, F. A., Tuomisto, H. L., Green, R., Harris, F. B., Joy, E. J., ... & Dangour, A. D. (2018). Effect of environmental changes on vegetable and legume yields and nutritional quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(26), 6804-6809.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., ... & Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 65-75.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom (1999). The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change, 525.
[Google Scholar] - Shue, H. (2017). Climate dreaming: negative emissions, risk transfer, and irreversibility. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 8(2), 203-216.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Stanton, E. A. (2011). Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality. Climatic Change, 107(3), 417-432.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[Google Scholar]
Cited By (1)
-
Junqing Zhang, Yugui Zhao, Junyu Zhang, Zhengxin Bai, Keshun You. Research on anomaly detection and operational status evaluation methods for smart electricity meters based on hybrid deep learning.
PLOS One, 2026 , 21 (6).
[CrossRef]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR AU - Xu, Chunming PY - 2025 DA - 2025/06/30 TI - Beyond the Breadbasket Paradox : Rethinking Agricultural Adaptation in the Age of Climate Coloniality JO - Agricultural Science and Food Processing T2 - Agricultural Science and Food Processing JF - Agricultural Science and Food Processing VL - 2 IS - 2 SP - 116 EP - 122 DO - 10.62762/ASFP.2025.456605 UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/ASFP.2025.456605 KW - breadbasket paradox AB - The commentary critiques Hultgren et al.'s "breadbasket paradox," asserting that limited adaptation in wealthy agricultural regions stems from systemic issues linked to climate coloniality, advocating for a decolonial, justice-focused approach to reframe agricultural adaptation under climate change. SN - 3066-1579 PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge LA - English ER -
@article{Xu2025Beyond,
author = {Chunming Xu},
title = {Beyond the Breadbasket Paradox : Rethinking Agricultural Adaptation in the Age of Climate Coloniality},
journal = {Agricultural Science and Food Processing},
year = {2025},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {116-122},
doi = {10.62762/ASFP.2025.456605},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/ASFP.2025.456605},
abstract = {The commentary critiques Hultgren et al.'s "breadbasket paradox," asserting that limited adaptation in wealthy agricultural regions stems from systemic issues linked to climate coloniality, advocating for a decolonial, justice-focused approach to reframe agricultural adaptation under climate change.},
keywords = {breadbasket paradox},
issn = {3066-1579},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Portico