A Spherical Fuzzy Set-Based Decision Support System for Evaluation of Logistics Subcontractors in 3PL Operations
Research Article  ·  Published: 30 April 2026
Issue cover
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2026: 18-31
Research Article Free to Read

A Spherical Fuzzy Set-Based Decision Support System for Evaluation of Logistics Subcontractors in 3PL Operations

1 Industrial Engineering Department, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Turkey
2 Industrial Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34349, Turkey
3 Department of Project and Integration, Horoz Lojistik Kargo Hiz. ve Tic.A.Ş., Istanbul, Turkey
* Corresponding Author: Irem Ucal Sari, [email protected]
Volume 1, Issue 1

Article Information

Abstract

The increasing complexity of global supply chains has made third-party logistics (3PL) service providers essential for companies seeking operational flexibility and cost efficiency. On-time delivery, a critical performance metric, directly impacts customer satisfaction, long-term business partnerships, and corporate reputation. However, challenges such as subcontractor management, subjective performance evaluation, and uncertainty in data significantly affect the reliability of performance assessments. This study proposes a novel decision support system utilizing Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVSF-AHP) and Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IVSF-TOPSIS) to evaluate the performance of logistics subcontractors. The IVSF-AHP method dynamically weights performance criteria, while the IVSF-TOPSIS model ranks subcontractor performance under uncertainty. The proposed model contributes to the literature by integrating fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to reflect both objective and subjective evaluations, offering a flexible and adaptive performance monitoring mechanism for 3PL firms. The framework is validated through a practical example, demonstrating its ability to support strategic and operational decisions in logistics subcontractor management.

Keywords

third-party logistics spherical fuzzy sets AHP TOPSIS

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

Ersin Şengül is affiliated with the Department of Project and Integration, Horoz Lojistik Kargo Hiz. ve Tic.A.Ş., Istanbul, Turkey. The authors declare that this affiliation had no influence on the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or the decision to publish, and that no other competing interests exist.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Rajesh, R., Pugazhendhi, S., Ganesh, K., Muralidharan, C., & Sathiamoorthy, R. (2011). Influence of 3PL service offerings on client performance in India. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(2), 149-165.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sahu, N. K., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2015). Fuzzy based appraisement module for 3PL evaluation and selection. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(3), 354-392.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jazairy, A., Lenhardt, J., & Von Haartman, R. (2017). Improving logistics performance in cross-border 3PL relationships. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(5), 491-513.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mothilal, S., Gunasekaran, A., Nachiappan, S. P., & Jayaram, J. (2012). Key success factors and their performance implications in the Indian 3PL industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(9), 2407-2422.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aguezzoul, A., & Paché, G. (2020). An AHP-ELECTRE I approach for 3PL-provider selection. International Journal of Transport Economics, 47(1), 37-50. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4649009
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Qureshi, M. N., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2009). Selection of 3PL service providers: A combined approach of AHP and Graph theory. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12(1), 35-60.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Onar, S. C., & Öztayşi, B. (2022). Pharmaceutical 3PL supplier selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Proceedings of the 25th Jubilee Edition, 28(3), 361-374.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2018). An analysis of satisfaction level of 3PL service users with the help of ACSI. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 24-46.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar, D., & Prashar, A. (2024). Linking resource bundling and logistics capability with performance: Study on 3PL providers in India. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(1), 270-302.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bunthongsang, W., Thawornsujaritkul, T., & Silpcharu, T. (2020). Guideline for decision to select use third party logistics service provider (3PL) to enhance performance of competitiveness in industrial business sectors. Transport, 2016(2017), 2018-2019. https://fba.kmutnb.ac.th/main/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/29GuidelineforDecisiontoSelectusThirdPartyLogistics31102565.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sinkovics, R. R., & Roath, A. S. (2004). Strategic orientation, capabilities, and performance in manufacturer—3PL relationships. Journal of business Logistics, 25(2), 43-64.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jovčić, S., & Průša, P. (2021). A hybrid MCDM approach in 3PL provider selection. Mathematics, 9(21), 2729.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sibanda, N., Tawanda, T., & Munapo, E. (2025). Efficiency Evaluation and Performance Comparison of Third-Party Logistics Providers: AHP-DEA Approach. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 10(5), 1232.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kritchanchai, D., Senarak, D., Supeekit, T., & Chanpuypetch, W. (2024). Evaluating supply chain network models for third party logistics operated supply-processing-distribution in Thai hospitals: An AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Logistics, 8(4), 116.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huo, B., Liu, C., Chen, H., & Zhao, X. (2017). Dependence, trust, and 3PL integration: an empirical study in China. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(9), 927-948.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Power, D., Sharafali, M., & Bhakoo, V. (2007). Adding value through outsourcing: Contribution of 3PL services to customer performance. Management research news, 30(3), 228-235.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tontini, G., Söilen, K. S., & Zanchett, R. (2017). Nonlinear antecedents of customer satisfaction and loyalty in third-party logistics services (3PL). Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(5), 1116-1135.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Arun, K., & Yildirim Ozmutlu, S. (2022). Narratives of environmental munificence of 3PL firms on the relationship between dynamic capabilities, strategic management and organizational performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(1), 96-118.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Özcan, E., & Ahıskalı, M. (2020). 3PL service provider selection with a goal programming model supported with multicriteria decision making approaches. Gazi University Journal of Science, 33(2), 413-427.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Aguezzoul, A., & Pires, S. (2016). 3PL performance evaluation and selection: a MCDM method. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 17(2), 87-94.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bansal, A., & Kumar, P. (2014). Evaluation of a 3PL company: an approach of fuzzy modelling. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 6(2), 131-161.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bianchini, A. (2018). 3PL provider selection by AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 235-252.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zaralı, F. (2022). Third Part Reverse Logistics Service Provider Selection Using the Spherical Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 38(2), 268-279. https://izlik.org/JA25PM53YB
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamdan, A., & Rogers, K. J. (2008). Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 235-244.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sangka, B. K., Rahman, S., Yadlapalli, A., & Jie, F. (2019). Managerial competencies of 3PL providers: a comparative analysis of Indonesian firms and multinational companies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(4), 1054-1077.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar, P., & Singh, R. K. (2012). A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), 287-303.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Baruffaldi, G., Accorsi, R., & Manzini, R. (2019). Warehouse management system customization and information availability in 3pl companies: A decision-support tool. Industrial management & data systems, 119(2), 251-273.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jayant, A., & Singh, P. (2015). Application of AHP-VIKOR hybrid MCDM approach for 3PL selection: a case study. International Journal of Computer Applications, 125(5), 4-11. https://www.ijcaonline.org/proceedings/icaet2015/number5/22234-4061/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lai, F., Zhao, X., & Wang, Q. (2007). Taxonomy of information technology strategy and its impact on the performance of 3PL in China. International Journal of Production Research, 45(10), 2195-2218.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 36(1), 337-352.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gündoğdu, F. K., & Kahraman, C. (2019). A novel fuzzy TOPSIS method using emerging interval-valued spherical fuzzy sets. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 307-323.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2020). Hospital performance assessment using interval-valued spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In Decision Making with Spherical Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications (pp. 349-373). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. Kobe, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Peng, X., & Yang, Y. (2016). Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(5), 444-487.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Peng, X., & Yang, Y. (2016). Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral based MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(10), 989-1020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jaller, M., & Otay, I. (2020). Evaluating sustainable vehicle technologies for freight transportation using spherical fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 118-126). Cham: Springer.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Raut, R., Kharat, M., Kamble, S., & Kumar, C. S. (2018). Sustainable evaluation and selection of potential 3PL providers: An integrated MCDM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 76-97.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahraman, C., Ucal Sari, I., & Çevik Onar, S. (2022). Strategic multi-criteria decision-making against pandemics using picture and spherical fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. In New Perspectives in Operations Research and Management Science: Essays in Honor of Fusun Ulengin (pp. 385-422). Cham: Springer.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Ucal Sari, I., Cebi, S., & Şengül, E. (2026). A Spherical Fuzzy Set-Based Decision Support System for Evaluation of Logistics Subcontractors in 3PL Operations. ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems, 1(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.62762/TAFS.2025.867168
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Sari, Irem Ucal
AU  - Cebi, Selcuk
AU  - Şengül, Ersin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/04/30
TI  - A Spherical Fuzzy Set-Based Decision Support System for Evaluation of Logistics Subcontractors in 3PL Operations
JO  - ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems
T2  - ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems
JF  - ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SP  - 18
EP  - 31
DO  - 10.62762/TAFS.2025.867168
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TAFS.2025.867168
KW  - third-party logistics
KW  - spherical fuzzy sets
KW  - AHP
KW  - TOPSIS
AB  - The increasing complexity of global supply chains has made third-party logistics (3PL) service providers essential for companies seeking operational flexibility and cost efficiency. On-time delivery, a critical performance metric, directly impacts customer satisfaction, long-term business partnerships, and corporate reputation. However, challenges such as subcontractor management, subjective performance evaluation, and uncertainty in data significantly affect the reliability of performance assessments. This study proposes a novel decision support system utilizing Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVSF-AHP) and Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IVSF-TOPSIS) to evaluate the performance of logistics subcontractors. The IVSF-AHP method dynamically weights performance criteria, while the IVSF-TOPSIS model ranks subcontractor performance under uncertainty. The proposed model contributes to the literature by integrating fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to reflect both objective and subjective evaluations, offering a flexible and adaptive performance monitoring mechanism for 3PL firms. The framework is validated through a practical example, demonstrating its ability to support strategic and operational decisions in logistics subcontractor management.
SN  - request pending
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Sari2026A,
  author = {Irem Ucal Sari and Selcuk Cebi and Ersin Şengül},
  title = {A Spherical Fuzzy Set-Based Decision Support System for Evaluation of Logistics Subcontractors in 3PL Operations},
  journal = {ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {18-31},
  doi = {10.62762/TAFS.2025.867168},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TAFS.2025.867168},
  abstract = {The increasing complexity of global supply chains has made third-party logistics (3PL) service providers essential for companies seeking operational flexibility and cost efficiency. On-time delivery, a critical performance metric, directly impacts customer satisfaction, long-term business partnerships, and corporate reputation. However, challenges such as subcontractor management, subjective performance evaluation, and uncertainty in data significantly affect the reliability of performance assessments. This study proposes a novel decision support system utilizing Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVSF-AHP) and Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IVSF-TOPSIS) to evaluate the performance of logistics subcontractors. The IVSF-AHP method dynamically weights performance criteria, while the IVSF-TOPSIS model ranks subcontractor performance under uncertainty. The proposed model contributes to the literature by integrating fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to reflect both objective and subjective evaluations, offering a flexible and adaptive performance monitoring mechanism for 3PL firms. The framework is validated through a practical example, demonstrating its ability to support strategic and operational decisions in logistics subcontractor management.},
  keywords = {third-party logistics, spherical fuzzy sets, AHP, TOPSIS},
  issn = {request pending},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
124
PDF Downloads
34

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge (ICCK) or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Fuzzy Systems
ISSN: request pending (Online) | ISSN: request pending (Print)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico