Reservoir Science Home About Editors Current Issue
From CO$_2$ Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs
Research Article  ·  Published: 30 September 2025
Issue cover
Reservoir Science
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025: 19-35
Research Article Open Access

From CO$_2$ Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs

by
Jingjuan Wu Jingjuan Wu 1 *
Ubedullah Ansari Ubedullah Ansari 2 ORCID
1 School of Material Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2 Institute of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan
* Corresponding Author: Jingjuan Wu, [email protected]
Volume 1, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1 2025
Received: 23 July 2025 Accepted: 17 September 2025 Published: 30 September 2025 CrossMark
Download PDF 14.22 MB Cite Metrics
DOI: 10.62762/RS.2025.860510
ARK: ark:/57805/rs.2025.860510

Article Information

Published in Reservoir Science
Volume/Issue Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025
Pages 19-35
Cited by 75 (Crossref) 80 (Scopus)

Abstract

The depleted gas reservoirs can serve not only as sites for CO$_2$ sequestration but also as potential spaces for hydrogen storage. However, this process remains insufficiently investigated and thus cannot offer reliable technical support for the injection operations. In this study, a mathematical model for simulating hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs was developed and numerically solved. Meanwhile, the applicability was then verified through comparison with results from previous studies. Based on this model, a detailed analysis was performed to investigate the evolution of key parameters under specific injection conditions. Finally, the effects of various factors on parameters such as hydrogen distribution and maximum pore pressure during the hydrogen injection process were thoroughly discussed. It was found that hydrogen gradually drives the CH$_4$ and CO$_2$ outward from the near-wellbore region, leading to increases in both bottom-hole pressure and pore pressure during hydrogen injection. Furthermore, as the injection progresses, the spatial extent of hydrogen distribution expands nonlinearly, and the buffering effects of CH$_4$ and CO$_2$ become prominent. Sensitivity analysis further reveals that, although low permeability-induced high pore pressure poses sealing challenges, limited hydrogen storage space within reservoir is beneficial for further hydrogen recovery. Meanwhile, a moderate increase in the injection rate can enhance storage efficiency without compromising reservoir sealing integrity. In contrast, extending the length of wellbore section used for hydrogen injection does not lead to a significant improvement in storage performance.

Graphical Abstract

From CO$_2$ Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs

Keywords

hydrogen storage CO$_2$ sequestration depleted gas reservoir CCUS H$_2$ injection clean energy

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M. D., Wagner, N., & Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yue, M., Lambert, H., Pahon, E., Roche, R., Jemei, S., & Hissel, D. (2021). Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146, 111180.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kourougianni, F., Arsalis, A., Olympios, A. V., Yiasoumas, G., Konstantinou, C., Papanastasiou, P., & Georghiou, G. E. (2024). A comprehensive review of green hydrogen energy systems. Renewable Energy, 231, 120911.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tarkowski, R. (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 86-94.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Qu, W., Zhang, J., Jiang, R., Liu, X., Zhang, H., Gao, Y., Hong, H., & Liu, T. (2022). An energy storage approach for storing surplus power into hydrogen in a cogeneration system. Energy Conversion and Management, 268, 116032.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fochesato, M., Peter, C., Morandi, L., & Lygeros, J. (2024). Peak shaving with hydrogen energy storage: From stochastic control to experiments on a 4 MWh facility. Applied Energy, 376, 123965.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Q. C., Han, Y., Liu, X., Ansari, U., Cheng, Y. F., & Yan, C. L. (2022). Hydrate as a by-product in CO2 leakage during the long-term sub-seabed sequestration and its role in preventing further leakage. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(51), 77737–77754.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao, X., Wang, H., Yang, K., Wu, S., Chen, Q., & Bian, J. (2022). Hydrate-based CO2 sequestration technology: Feasibilities, mechanisms, influencing factors, and applications. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 219, 111121.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wei, B., Wang, B., Li, X., Aishan, M., & Ju, Y. (2023). CO2 storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs: A review. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 9(2), 76–93.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Askarova, A., Mukhametdinova, A., Markovic, S., Khayrullina, G., Afanasev, P., Popov, E., & Mukhina, E. (2023). An overview of geological CO2 sequestration in oil and gas reservoirs. Energies, 16(6), 2821.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tyne, R. L., Barry, P. H., Lawson, M., Byrne, D. J., Warr, O., Xie, H., Hillegonds, D. J., Formolo, M., Summers, Z. M., Skinner, B., Eiler, J. M., & Ballentine, C. J. (2021). Rapid microbial methanogenesis during CO2 storage in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Nature, 600(7890), 670–674.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng, P., Ma, H., Song, J., Peng, X., Zhu, S., Xue, D., Jiang, L., & Chen, Z. (2025). Carbon dioxide as cushion gas for large-scale underground hydrogen storage: Mechanisms and implications. Applied Energy, 388, 125622.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Saeed, M., Jadhawar, P., & Bagala, S. (2023). Geochemical effects on storage gases and reservoir rock during underground hydrogen storage: a depleted North Sea oil reservoir case study. Hydrogen, 4(2), 323–337.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cao, B. J., Sun, Y. F., Chen, H. N., Zhong, J. R., Wang, M. L., Niu, M. Y., Kan, J., Sun, C., Chen, D., & Chen, G. J. (2023). An approach to the high efficient exploitation of nature gas hydrate and carbon sequestration via injecting CO2/H2 gas mixture with varying composition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 455, 140634.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dehghani, M. R., Ghazi, S. F., & Kazemzadeh, Y. (2024). Interfacial tension and wettability alteration during hydrogen and carbon dioxide storage in depleted gas reservoirs. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 11594.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, K., Zhu, W., & Pan, B. (2024). Feasibility of hydrogen storage in depleted shale gas reservoir: A numerical investigation. Fuel, 357, 129703.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muhammed, N. S., Haq, B., Al Shehri, D., & ... (2023). Role of methane as a cushion gas for hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(76), 29663–29681.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kanaani, M., Sedaee, B., & Asadian-Pakfar, M. (2022). Role of cushion gas on underground hydrogen storage in depleted oil reservoirs. Journal of Energy Storage, 45, 103783.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. He, Y., Xie, Y., Qiao, Y., Qin, J., & Tang, Y. (2024). Estimation of underground hydrogen storage capacity in depleted gas reservoirs using CO2 as cushion gas. Applied Energy, 375, 124093.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zeng, L., Sarmadivaleh, M., Saeedi, A., Chen, Y., Zhong, Z., & Xie, Q. (2023). Storage integrity during underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs. Earth-Science Reviews, 247, 104625.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zivar, D., Kumar, S., & Foroozesh, J. (2021). Underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review. International journal of hydrogen energy, 46(45), 23436-23462.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirhasan Hosseini, S. I., Fahimpour, J., Ali, M., & Keshavarz, A. (2022). Capillary Sealing Efficiency Analysis of Caprocks: Implication for Hydrogen Geological Storage. Energy & Fuels, 36(7), 4065–4075.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yin, H., Yang, C., Ma, H., Shi, X., Zhang, N., Ge, X., ... & Han, Y. (2020). Stability evaluation of underground gas storage salt caverns with micro-leakage interlayer in bedded rock salt of Jintan, China. Acta Geotechnica, 15(3), 549-563.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shahmorad, Z., Salarirad, H., & Molladavoudi, H. (2016). A study on the effect of utilizing different constitutive models in the stability analysis of an underground gas storage within a salt structure. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 33, 808–820.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wei, L., Jie, C., Deyi, J., Xilin, S., Yinping, L., Daemen, J. J. K., & Chunhe, Y. (2016). Tightness and suitability evaluation of abandoned salt caverns served as hydrocarbon energies storage under adverse geological conditions (AGC). Applied Energy, 178, 703–720.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu, J., Muhammed, N. S., Okolie, J. A., & Epelle, E. I. (2025). A sensitivity study of hydrogen mixing with cushion gases for effective storage in porous media. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 9(5), 1353–1370.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hosseini, M., Ali, M., Fahimpour, J., Keshavarz, A., & Iglauer, S. (2022). Basalt-H2-brine wettability at geo-storage conditions: Implication for hydrogen storage in basaltic formations. Journal of Energy Storage, 52, 104745.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sainz-Garcia, A., Abarca, E., Rubi, V., & Grandia, F. (2017). Assessment of feasible strategies for seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(26), 16657–16666.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zamehrian, M., & Sedaee, B. (2022). Underground hydrogen storage in a naturally fractured gas reservoir: The role of fracture. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(93), 39606–39618.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zeng, L., Sander, R., Chen, Y., & Xie, Q. (2024). Hydrogen storage performance during underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: a review. Engineering, 40, 211–225.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J., Miocic, J. M., Hangx, S. J., Kallmeyer, J., Ostertag-Henning, C., ... & Rudloff, A. (2021). Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media–the scientific challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(2), 853-864.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perera, M. S. A. (2023). A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: Insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity. Fuel, 334, 126677.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Okere, C. J., Sheng, J. J., & Ejike, C. (2024). Evaluating reservoir suitability for large-scale hydrogen storage: a preliminary assessment considering reservoir properties. Energy Geoscience, 5(4), 100318.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cited By (76)

  1. Bao Jia, Zhongwei Huang. Thermophysical, multiphase-flow, geochemical, and microbial controls on combined H2–CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs and saline aquifers. Fuel, 2027 , 429 .
    [CrossRef]
  2. Thenkaraimuthu Mariprasath, Kaliappan Esakkiappan, Shaik M Ali, Muraly Natarajan, Basem A Zneid, Oleksandr Rubanenko. A system-level critical assessment of electric mobility integrating electric vehicle powertrains, advanced battery technologies, grid impacts, artificial intelligence, and sustainability. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2026 , 44 (4).
    [CrossRef]
  3. Yifeng Ma, Jianwei Gu, Feng Xu, Fan Cheng, Yuxia Shi, Xiaojian Su, Siyuan Zhang, Caili Dai. Experimental Study on Reservoir Damage Mechanisms of Depleted Gas Reservoirs Considering Variable Pressure Depletion Rates During Multi-Cycle Injection and Production. Processes, 2026 , 14 (10).
    [CrossRef]
  4. Fuling Wang, Hongqi Cao, Chenyi Tang, Chengzhe Lu, Yixin Zhang, Rui Deng, Yandong Yang. Factor Analysis and Mechanism Revelation of Reservoir Conditions and Driving Fluids Affecting Geothermal Energy Extraction. Eng, 2026 , 7 (5).
    [CrossRef]
  5. Marialuna Loffredo, Cristina Serazio, Nicolò Santi Vasile, Eloisa Salina Borello, Matteo Scapolo, Donatella Barbieri, Andrea Mantegazzi, Fabrizio Candido Pirri, Francesca Verga, Christian Coti, Dario Viberti. A Rock-on-a-Chip Approach to Investigate Flow Behavior for Underground Gas Storage Applications. Energies, 2026 , 19 (2).
    [CrossRef]
  6. Uliya Mitra, Anoop Arya, Sushma Gupta. DC microgrid integration of an optimized proton exchange membrane fuel cell utilizing a cost-effective clamping boost converter. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 2026 , 103 (2).
    [CrossRef]
  7. Qiuyue Zhang, Renyi Cao, Xinyi Zheng, Linsong Cheng, Gaofei Yan. Hydrogen adsorption and diffusion in caprock mineral slits: A molecular dynamics study for underground storage. Physics of Fluids, 2026 , 38 (6).
    [CrossRef]
  8. Vladimir V. Bukhtoyarov, Alexey A. Gorodov, Natalia A. Shepeta, Ivan S. Nekrasov, Oleg A. Kolenchukov, Svetlana S. Kositsyna, Artem Y. Mikhaylov. A Physics-Informed Combinatorial Digital Twin for Value-Optimized Production of Petroleum Coke. Energies, 2026 , 19 (2).
    [CrossRef]
  9. Zhenglian Yuan, Xianglu Tang, Zhenxue Jiang, Shu Jiang, Ze Li, Shitan Ning, Xiaolong Yan, Caihua Lin. Controlling Effect of Seepage Channels in Tight Reservoirs on Fluid Flow Capacity Based on Pore–Throat Network Numerical Simulation and Fluid Injection Experiments. Energies, 2026 , 19 (3).
    [CrossRef]
  10. Nader Naifar. Tail-Risk Spillovers in Strategic Commodity and Carbon Markets: Evidence for Natural Resource Risk Management. Resources, 2026 , 15 (4).
    [CrossRef]
  11. Xing Wang, Yongjiang Luo, Sicheng Wang, Yu Meng, Guoqing Yin, Qi He. Hydraulic fracture propagation characteristics in coal mines hard roof rocks with PAM fracturing fluid. Results in Engineering, 2026 , 29 .
    [CrossRef]
  12. Yunjun Zhang, Hao Zhang, Li Zhang, Jianlin Li, Yaohui Yan. Pore-micro fracture structure, porosity and gas- bearing property of deep shale under lithofacies-formation pressure coupling. Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  13. Wei-dong Zhao, Li-ping Fang, Zhen-qiang Xie, Xiong Zhou. Prediction of liquid accumulation in a shale gas pipeline. Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  14. Juhi Jannat Mim, Abdullah Al Momen, Md. Rubayet Alam, Md Arif Hasan, Golam Azam, Md. Aminul Islam, Nayem Hossain, Li Qingchao. 3D Printing With Cementitious Composites: Innovations, Challenges, and Prospects—A Review. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2026 , 2026 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  15. Lei Guo, Ben-sheng Huang, Zhong-feng Liu, Jing Qiu. Eliminating air entrainment in complex siphon drainage systems: a physical modelling approach. Discover Applied Sciences, 2026 , 8 (4).
    [CrossRef]
  16. Magzhan N. Orynbasar, Vladimir E. Messerle, Alexandr B. Ustimenko, Sestager Kh. Aknazarov. Production of Synthesis Gas by Plasma–Steam Gasification of Solid Fuels with Different Ash and Volatile Matter Contents: An Experiment and Thermodynamic Calculations. Gases, 2026 , 6 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  17. Xiangjun Ren, Hao Li. Effect of die temperature variation on biomass pelletizing and optimization of built-in heat source. Energy Reports, 2026 , 15 .
    [CrossRef]
  18. Shruti Malik, Parsa Alimohammadiardakani, Mayur Pal. Comparative Analysis of Flow Behavior and Geochemical Impact of CO2 and Hydrogen in Lithuanian Saline Aquifer: A Simulation and Experimental Study. Energies, 2026 , 19 (2).
    [CrossRef]
  19. Eirini Maria Kanakaki, Sofianos Panagiotis Fotias, Vassilis Gaganis. Rapid Screening of CO2 Injection Schedules Using Activity-Based Reservoir Partitioning and Slow-Region Derivative ML Proxies. Processes, 2026 , 14 (13).
    [CrossRef]
  20. Shuhui Huang, Zhuyu Zhao, Zhiyou Chen, Qin Yong, Bo Sun, Wenna Jiang, Xiaomeng Han, Jun Lin. Research on the interfacial penetration mechanism in gas-assisted co-injection molding of polymers with different cross-sectional cavities. Iranian Polymer Journal, 2026 .
    [CrossRef]
* Citation data provided by Crossref Cited-by.

Cite This Article

APA Style
Wu, J., & Ansari, U. (2025). From CO2 Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs. Reservoir Science, 1(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.62762/RS.2025.860510
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Wu, Jingjuan
AU  - Ansari, Ubedullah
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/09/30
TI  - From CO$_2$ Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs
JO  - Reservoir Science
T2  - Reservoir Science
JF  - Reservoir Science
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SP  - 19
EP  - 35
DO  - 10.62762/RS.2025.860510
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/RS.2025.860510
KW  - hydrogen storage
KW  - CO$_2$ sequestration
KW  - depleted gas reservoir
KW  - CCUS
KW  - H$_2$ injection
KW  - clean energy
AB  - The depleted gas reservoirs can serve not only as sites for CO$_2$ sequestration but also as potential spaces for hydrogen storage. However, this process remains insufficiently investigated and thus cannot offer reliable technical support for the injection operations. In this study, a mathematical model for simulating hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs was developed and numerically solved. Meanwhile, the applicability was then verified through comparison with results from previous studies. Based on this model, a detailed analysis was performed to investigate the evolution of key parameters under specific injection conditions. Finally, the effects of various factors on parameters such as hydrogen distribution and maximum pore pressure during the hydrogen injection process were thoroughly discussed. It was found that hydrogen gradually drives the CH$_4$ and CO$_2$ outward from the near-wellbore region, leading to increases in both bottom-hole pressure and pore pressure during hydrogen injection. Furthermore, as the injection progresses, the spatial extent of hydrogen distribution expands nonlinearly, and the buffering effects of CH$_4$ and CO$_2$ become prominent. Sensitivity analysis further reveals that, although low permeability-induced high pore pressure poses sealing challenges, limited hydrogen storage space within reservoir is beneficial for further hydrogen recovery. Meanwhile, a moderate increase in the injection rate can enhance storage efficiency without compromising reservoir sealing integrity. In contrast, extending the length of wellbore section used for hydrogen injection does not lead to a significant improvement in storage performance.
SN  - 3070-2356
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  -
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Wu2025From,
  author = {Jingjuan Wu and Ubedullah Ansari},
  title = {From CO\$\_2\$ Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs},
  journal = {Reservoir Science},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {19-35},
  doi = {10.62762/RS.2025.860510},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/RS.2025.860510},
  abstract = {The depleted gas reservoirs can serve not only as sites for CO\$\_2\$ sequestration but also as potential spaces for hydrogen storage. However, this process remains insufficiently investigated and thus cannot offer reliable technical support for the injection operations. In this study, a mathematical model for simulating hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs was developed and numerically solved. Meanwhile, the applicability was then verified through comparison with results from previous studies. Based on this model, a detailed analysis was performed to investigate the evolution of key parameters under specific injection conditions. Finally, the effects of various factors on parameters such as hydrogen distribution and maximum pore pressure during the hydrogen injection process were thoroughly discussed. It was found that hydrogen gradually drives the CH\$\_4\$ and CO\$\_2\$ outward from the near-wellbore region, leading to increases in both bottom-hole pressure and pore pressure during hydrogen injection. Furthermore, as the injection progresses, the spatial extent of hydrogen distribution expands nonlinearly, and the buffering effects of CH\$\_4\$ and CO\$\_2\$ become prominent. Sensitivity analysis further reveals that, although low permeability-induced high pore pressure poses sealing challenges, limited hydrogen storage space within reservoir is beneficial for further hydrogen recovery. Meanwhile, a moderate increase in the injection rate can enhance storage efficiency without compromising reservoir sealing integrity. In contrast, extending the length of wellbore section used for hydrogen injection does not lead to a significant improvement in storage performance.},
  keywords = {hydrogen storage, CO\$\_2\$ sequestration, depleted gas reservoir, CCUS, H\$\_2\$ injection, clean energy},
  issn = {3070-2356},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
75
Scopus
80
Views
21537
PDF Downloads
3627

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Reservoir Science
Reservoir Science
ISSN: 3070-2356 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico

Article QR Code

Article QR Code
Scan to read this article
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue

Popular Articles

Share This Article