A Multimodal Ensemble Learning Framework for Early Detection of Adolescent Depression Using Multi-Source Real-World Data
Research Article  ·  Published: 01 October 2026
Issue cover
ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026: 63-84
Research Article Free to Read

A Multimodal Ensemble Learning Framework for Early Detection of Adolescent Depression Using Multi-Source Real-World Data

1 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211015, India
2 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur 495009, India
3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, United College of Engineering and Research, Prayagraj 211010, India
* Corresponding Author: Ramesh K. Bhukya, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 2
You have access to this article · Limited-Time Free Access

Article Information

Abstract

Depression and academic stress undermine students' attendance, performance, and retention, yet educational institutions lack reliable early-alert tools. Because about three-quarters of lifetime psychiatric conditions emerge before age 25, timely automated screening is critical for early intervention. This paper proposes a multi-source ensemble learning framework for distinguishing {\it depression} (DP) from {\it non-depression} (ND) using 1,547 harmonized samples drawn from six real-world sources: occupational surveys, student academic stress records, Twitter sentiment data, Reddit depression posts, fine-grained emotion corpora, and behavioural monitoring signals. Academic stress and behavioural records serve as the core educational sources, while the remaining sources broaden linguistic and affective coverage. Six {\it machine learning} (ML) classifiers were benchmarked under 10-fold cross-validation: {\it decision tree} (DT), {\it support vector machine} (SVM), {\it random forest} (RF), {\it adaptive boosting} (AdaBoost), {\it extreme gradient boosting} (XGBoost), and {\it light gradient boosting machine} (LightGBM). RF performed best, achieving 97.996% accuracy, the highest sensitivity (96.741%), only 6 false positives, and 25 missed DP cases. LightGBM recorded the highest specificity (99.615%), making it suitable for precision-oriented screening, whereas the boosting ensembles performed comparably to the linear SVM and all ensembles clearly outperformed the DT baseline. These findings support ensemble learning, particularly bagging, for heterogeneous, multi-source student mental health data and suggest practical value for counsellors and student support services in identifying at-risk students early.

Graphical Abstract

A Multimodal Ensemble Learning Framework for Early Detection of Adolescent Depression Using Multi-Source Real-World Data

Keywords

educational data mining student depression academic stress student well-being learning analytics early warning systems

Data Availability Statement

The datasets and source code supporting the findings of this study are publicly available. The datasets can be accessed through the following links: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/mmnzx4w8cg/1 (OSMI), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/gargmanas/sentimental-analysis-for-tweets?resource=download (Tweets), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/abdullahashfaqvirk/student-mental-health-survey (Mental Health IT), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/hopesb/student-depression-dataset (Student Depression),https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/46j8wrc7p7/1 (Health and Sleep), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/suchintikasarkar/sentiment-analysis-for-mental-health (Sentiment Analysis), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/praveengovi/emotions-dataset-for-nlp (Emotional NLP Dataset), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/infamouscoder/depression-reddit-cleaned (Depression: Reddit), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/debarshichanda/goemotions (GoEmotions), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/faisalsanto007/isear-dataset (ISEAR), and https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/dartweichen/student-life (Student Life). The implementation details and source code are available at: https://github.com/RamSitha/AI-YMH.

Funding

This work was supported by Telecommunications Consultants India Limited (TCIL), a Government of India enterprise under the administrative control of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), as part of the “100 5G Use Case Labs” initiative.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Uhlhaas, P. J., Davey, C. G., Mehta, U. M., Shah, J., Torous, J., Allen, N. B., ... & Wood, S. J. (2023). Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap. Molecular psychiatry, 28(8), 3171-3181.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kessler, R. C., Amminger, G. P., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Lee, S., & Üstün, T. B. (2007). Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(4), 359-364.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. McGorry, P. D., & Mei, C. (2018). Early intervention in youth mental health: progress and future directions. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 21(4), 182-184.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS) Team. (2004). Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial. Jama, 292(7), 807-820.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vyas, N. S., Birchwood, M., & Singh, S. P. (2015). Youth services: meeting the mental health needs of adolescents. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 32(1), 13-19.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. McGorry, P., Trethowan, J., & Rickwood, D. (2019). Creating headspace for integrated youth mental health care. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 140-141.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yung, A. R., Yung, A. R., Pan Yuen, H., Mcgorry, P. D., Phillips, L. J., Kelly, D., ... & Buckby, J. (2005). Mapping the onset of psychosis: the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39(11-12), 964-971.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weisz, J. R., McCarty, C. A., & Valeri, S. M. (2006). Effects of psychotherapy for depression in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 132-149.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Appleton, R., Barnett, P., Clarke, C., Yang, J., Begum, S., Edbrooke-Childs, J., ... & Johnson, S. (2025). Approaches to early intervention for common mental health problems in young people: a systematic review. BMC medicine, 23(1), 651.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Torous, J., Myrick, K. J., Rauseo-Ricupero, N., & Firth, J. (2020). Digital mental health and COVID-19: using technology today to accelerate the curve on access and quality tomorrow. JMIR mental health, 7(3), e18848.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Domhardt, M., Steubl, L., & Baumeister, H. (2018). Internet-and mobile-based interventions for mental and somatic conditions in children and adolescents. Zeitschrift für Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 48(1), 33-46.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ho, T. Q. A., Le, L. K.-D., Engel, L., Le, N., Melvin, G., Le, H. N. D., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2025). Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with web-based mental health interventions in young people: a systematic review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(1), 83-100.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nesi, J. (2020). The impact of social media on youth mental health: challenges and opportunities. North Carolina Medical Journal, 81(2), 116-121.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Power, E., Hughes, S., Cotter, D., & Cannon, M. (2020). Youth mental health in the time of COVID-19. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 37(4), 301-305.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Riper, H., & Hedman-Lagerl\"{of, E. (2018). Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47(1), 1-18.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., Chanen, A., Hodges, C., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., & Killackey, E. (2022). Designing and scaling up integrated youth mental health care. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 61-76.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marshall, N. J., Loades, M. E., Jacobs, C., Biddle, L., & Lambert, J. D. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in youth mental health care: Advances, challenges, and future directions. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 12(1), 11.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mlakar, I., Šafran, V., Plohl, N., Kumperščak, H. G., Močnik, S., Smogavc, Ž., & Smrke, U. (2026). Technology-mediated screening interviews for youth mental health: content validation, randomized controlled trial, and expert evaluation. PLOS Digital Health, 5(4), e0001069.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Squires, M., Tao, X., Elangovan, S., Gururajan, R., Zhou, X., Acharya, U. R., & Li, Y. (2023). Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment. Brain Informatics, 10(1), 10.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Agarwal, N., Dias, G., & Dollfus, S. (2024). Multi-view graph-based interview representation to improve depression level estimation. Brain Informatics, 11(1), 14.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharma, G., Yaffe, M. J., Ghadiri, P., Gandhi, R., Pinkham, L., Gore, G., & Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, S. (2025). Use of artificial intelligence in adolescents' mental health care: systematic scoping review of current applications and future directions. JMIR Mental Health, 12, e70438.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhou, Q., Chen, Z. H., Cao, Y. H., & Peng, S. (2021). Clinical impact and quality of randomized controlled trials involving interventions evaluating artificial intelligence prediction tools: a systematic review. NPJ digital medicine, 4(1), 154.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chang, J. P. C., Cheng, S. W., Chang, S. M. J., & Su, K. P. (2025). Navigating the digital maze: a review of AI bias, social media, and mental health in Generation Z. AI, 6(6), 118.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koutsouleris, N., Hauser, T. U., Skvortsova, V., & De Choudhury, M. (2022). From promise to practice: towards the realisation of AI-informed mental health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 4(11), e829-e840.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Arias, D., Saxena, S., & Verguet, S. (2022). Quantifying the global burden of mental disorders and their economic value. eClinicalMedicine, 54, 101675.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maughan, B., Collishaw, S., & Stringaris, A. (2013). Depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(1), 35-40. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/depression-in-childhood-and-adolescence
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Torous, J., & Blease, C. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: potential benefits and current challenges. World Psychiatry, 23(1), 1-2.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mental health, 4(2), e19.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gopalakrishnan, A., Gururajan, R., Venkataraman, R., Zhou, X., Ching, K. C., Saravanan, A., & Sen, M. (2023). Attribute selection hybrid network model for risk factors analysis of postpartum depression using social media. Brain Informatics, 10(1), 28.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moor, S., Williman, J., Drummond, S., Fulton, C., Mayes, W., Ward, N., ... & Stasiak, K. (2019). 'E'therapy in the community: Examination of the uptake and effectiveness of BRAVE (a self-help computer programme for anxiety in children and adolescents) in primary care. Internet Interventions, 18, 100249.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gohari, M. R., Doggett, A., Patte, K. A., Ferro, M. A., Dubin, J. A., Hilario, C., & Leatherdale, S. T. (2024). Using random forest to identify correlates of depression symptoms among adolescents. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 59(11), 2063-2071.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mullick, T., Radovic, A., Shaaban, S., & Doryab, A. (2022). Predicting depression in adolescents using mobile and wearable sensors: multimodal machine learning–based exploratory study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(6), e35807.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ebert, D. D., Van Daele, T., Nordgreen, T., Karekla, M., Compare, A., Zarbo, C., ... & Baumeister, H. (2018). Internet-and mobile-based psychological interventions: applications, efficacy, and potential for improving mental health. European Psychologist, 23(2), 167-187.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Grist, R., Croker, A., Denne, M., & Stallard, P. (2019). Technology delivered interventions for depression and anxiety in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical child and family psychology review, 22(2), 147-171.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Garrido, S., Millington, C., Cheers, D., Boydell, K., Schubert, E., Meade, T., & Nguyen, Q. V. (2019). What works and what doesn't work? A systematic review of digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in young people. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 759.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78-106.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Barker, E. T., Howard, A. L., Villemaire-Krajden, R., & Galambos, N. L. (2018). The rise and fall of depressive symptoms and academic stress in two samples of university students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1252-1266.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bhujade, V. M. (2017). Depression, anxiety and academic stress among college students: A brief review. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 8(7), 748-751. https://www.proquest.com/openview/62b3afd412639d502f219859b188a281/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032134
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Veal, C., Tomlinson, A., Cipriani, A., Bulteau, S., Henry, C., Müh, C., ... & Chevance, A. (2024). Heterogeneity of outcome measures in depression trials and the relevance of the content of outcome measures to patients: a systematic review. The Lancet Psychiatry, 11(4), 285-294.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Andargeery, S. Y. (2024). The perception and association between depression and academic stress among female undergraduate nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1414469.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Peverill, M., Dirks, M. A., Narvaja, T., Herts, K. L., Comer, J. S., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2021). Socioeconomic status and child psychopathology in the United States: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Clinical psychology review, 83, 101933.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kemp, J., Chorney, J., Kassam, I., MacDonald, J., MacDonald, T., Wozney, L., & Strudwick, G. (2021). Learning about the current state of digital mental health interventions for Canadian youth to inform future decision-making: mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(10), e30491.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhai, Y., Zhang, Y., Chu, Z., Geng, B., Almaawali, M., Fulmer, R., ... & Du, X. (2025). Machine learning predictive models to guide prevention and intervention allocation for anxiety and depressive disorders among college students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 103(1), 110-125.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Graham, A. K., Lattie, E. G., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Smith, J. D., Schueller, S. M., ... & Mohr, D. C. (2020). Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings. American Psychologist, 75(8), 1080.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Langley, A. K., Nadeem, E., Kataoka, S. H., Stein, B. D., & Jaycox, L. H. (2010). Evidence-based mental health programs in schools: Barriers and facilitators of successful implementation. School Mental Health, 2(3), 105-113.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rojas-Andrade, R., & Bahamondes, L. L. (2019). Is implementation fidelity important? A systematic review on school-based mental health programs. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(4), 339-350.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, Y., Larson, M., Ehrhart, M. G., King, K., Locke, J., Cook, C. R., & Lyon, A. R. (2024). Inter-organizational alignment and implementation outcomes in integrated mental healthcare for children and adolescents: a cross-sectional observational study. Implementation Science, 19(1), 36.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shalaby, R. A. H., & Agyapong, V. I. (2020). Peer support in mental health: literature review. JMIR mental health, 7(6), e15572.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 195.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Powell, A. C., Bowman, M. B., & Harbin, H. T. (2019). Reimbursement of apps for mental health: findings from interviews. JMIR mental health, 6(8), e14724.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhao, X., Stadnick, N. A., Ceballos-Corro, E., Castro Jr, J., Mallard-Swanson, K., Palomares, K. J., ... & Sorkin, D. H. (2023). Facilitators of and barriers to integrating digital mental health into county mental health services: qualitative interview analyses. JMIR Formative Research, 7, e45718.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81-106.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3), 273-297.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of computer and system sciences, 55(1), 119-139.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146-3154.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794).
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kaman, P. D. A., Devine, P. D. J., Erhart, P. D. M., Napp, M. S. A. K., Reiss, P. D. F., Moeller, S., ... & Ravens-Sieberer, P. D. U. (2025). Youth mental health in times of global crises: evidence from the German longitudinal COVID-19 and psychological health study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 77(6), 1050-1057.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vestergaard, C. L., Skogen, J. C., Hysing, M., Harvey, A. G., Vedaa, Ø., & Sivertsen, B. (2024). Sleep duration and mental health in young adults. Sleep Medicine, 115, 30-38.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kar, B., & Sarkar, B. K. (2024). Changes in mental health of Indian students due to online classes during COVID-19 pandemic. Procedia Computer Science, 235, 2452-2465.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rasheed, F., Khan, S., Waqas, S. M., Khan, R. A., & Arif, S. (2024). Survey dataset on mental health in tech professionals from open sourcing mental health surveys (2017-2021). Data in Brief, 54, 110377.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Bhukya, R. B., Singh, N., & Tiwari, A. (2026). A Multimodal Ensemble Learning Framework for Early Detection of Adolescent Depression Using Multi-Source Real-World Data. ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining, 2(2), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.62762/TEDM.2026.244050
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bhukya, Ramesh K.
AU  - Singh, Nirbhay
AU  - Tiwari, Aniket
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
TI  - A Multimodal Ensemble Learning Framework for Early Detection of Adolescent Depression Using Multi-Source Real-World Data
JO  - ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining
T2  - ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining
JF  - ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
SP  - 63
EP  - 84
DO  - 10.62762/TEDM.2026.244050
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TEDM.2026.244050
KW  - educational data mining
KW  - student depression
KW  - academic stress
KW  - student well-being
KW  - learning analytics
KW  - early warning systems
AB  - Depression and academic stress undermine students' attendance, performance, and retention, yet educational institutions lack reliable early-alert tools. Because about three-quarters of lifetime psychiatric conditions emerge before age 25, timely automated screening is critical for early intervention. This paper proposes a multi-source ensemble learning framework for distinguishing {\it depression} (DP) from {\it non-depression} (ND) using 1,547 harmonized samples drawn from six real-world sources: occupational surveys, student academic stress records, Twitter sentiment data, Reddit depression posts, fine-grained emotion corpora, and behavioural monitoring signals. Academic stress and behavioural records serve as the core educational sources, while the remaining sources broaden linguistic and affective coverage. Six {\it machine learning} (ML) classifiers were benchmarked under 10-fold cross-validation: {\it decision tree} (DT), {\it support vector machine} (SVM), {\it random forest} (RF), {\it adaptive boosting} (AdaBoost), {\it extreme gradient boosting} (XGBoost), and {\it light gradient boosting machine} (LightGBM). RF performed best, achieving 97.996% accuracy, the highest sensitivity (96.741%), only 6 false positives, and 25 missed DP cases. LightGBM recorded the highest specificity (99.615%), making it suitable for precision-oriented screening, whereas the boosting ensembles performed comparably to the linear SVM and all ensembles clearly outperformed the DT baseline. These findings support ensemble learning, particularly bagging, for heterogeneous, multi-source student mental health data and suggest practical value for counsellors and student support services in identifying at-risk students early.
SN  - 3070-5843
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Bhukya2026A,
  author = {Ramesh K. Bhukya and Nirbhay Singh and Aniket Tiwari},
  title = {A Multimodal Ensemble Learning Framework for Early Detection of Adolescent Depression Using Multi-Source Real-World Data},
  journal = {ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {63-84},
  doi = {10.62762/TEDM.2026.244050},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TEDM.2026.244050},
  abstract = {Depression and academic stress undermine students' attendance, performance, and retention, yet educational institutions lack reliable early-alert tools. Because about three-quarters of lifetime psychiatric conditions emerge before age 25, timely automated screening is critical for early intervention. This paper proposes a multi-source ensemble learning framework for distinguishing {\it depression} (DP) from {\it non-depression} (ND) using 1,547 harmonized samples drawn from six real-world sources: occupational surveys, student academic stress records, Twitter sentiment data, Reddit depression posts, fine-grained emotion corpora, and behavioural monitoring signals. Academic stress and behavioural records serve as the core educational sources, while the remaining sources broaden linguistic and affective coverage. Six {\it machine learning} (ML) classifiers were benchmarked under 10-fold cross-validation: {\it decision tree} (DT), {\it support vector machine} (SVM), {\it random forest} (RF), {\it adaptive boosting} (AdaBoost), {\it extreme gradient boosting} (XGBoost), and {\it light gradient boosting machine} (LightGBM). RF performed best, achieving 97.996\% accuracy, the highest sensitivity (96.741\%), only 6 false positives, and 25 missed DP cases. LightGBM recorded the highest specificity (99.615\%), making it suitable for precision-oriented screening, whereas the boosting ensembles performed comparably to the linear SVM and all ensembles clearly outperformed the DT baseline. These findings support ensemble learning, particularly bagging, for heterogeneous, multi-source student mental health data and suggest practical value for counsellors and student support services in identifying at-risk students early.},
  keywords = {educational data mining, student depression, academic stress, student well-being, learning analytics, early warning systems},
  issn = {3070-5843},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
12
PDF Downloads
2

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge (ICCK) or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining
ICCK Transactions on Educational Data Mining
ISSN: 3070-5843 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico