Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions Monitoring and Forecasting: a Systematic Review of Smart Environmental Accounting Systems
Review Article  ·  Published: 30 June 2026
Issue cover
Journal of Carbon Neutrality
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025: 64-82
Review Article Open Access

Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions Monitoring and Forecasting: a Systematic Review of Smart Environmental Accounting Systems

1 School of Information Sciences and Technology, Harare Institute of Technology, Harare, Zimbabwe
* Corresponding Author: Tsitsi Shannon Chaparika, [email protected]
Volume 1, Issue 1

Article Information

Pages 64-82

Abstract

The growing urgency of climate change mitigation has increased pressure to develop reliable systems capable of monitoring and predicting carbon emissions. Conventional carbon accounting methods based on manual reporting and periodic environmental assessments frequently produce delayed and incomplete emissions data. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. It examines existing literature on the application of digital technologies for carbon monitoring and management. The review focuses on Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, artificial intelligence (AI) forecasting models, carbon accounting frameworks and integrated digital carbon management systems. A structured search of five major academic databases yielded 100 peer-reviewed studies, selected and analysed across four thematic areas. Results demonstrate that IoT technologies effectively support real-time environmental monitoring and AI models reliably predict emissions trends. However, the literature reveals persistent weaknesses in the integration of monitoring systems with carbon accounting models. This review identifies critical research gaps and calls for the development of unified IoT–AI platforms to support accurate carbon management and climate governance.

Keywords

smart environmental monitoring systems Internet of Things (IoT) carbon emissions monitoring carbon accounting

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ajala, A. A., Adeoye, O. L., Salami, O. M., & Jimoh, A. Y. (2025). An examination of daily CO2 emissions prediction through a comparative analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and statistical models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(5), 2510-2535.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Gregor, L., Hauck, J., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Alkama, R., ... Zheng, B. (2022). Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11), 4811–4900.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arun, M., Gopan, G., Vembu, S., Ozsahin, D. U., Ahmad, H., & Alotaibi, M. F. (2024). Internet of things and deep learning-enhanced monitoring for energy efficiency in older buildings. Case studies in thermal engineering, 61, 104867.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Batjes, N. H., Ceschia, E., Heuvelink, G. B., Demenois, J., Le Maire, G., Cardinael, R., ... & van Egmond, F. (2024). Towards a modular, multi-ecosystem monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) framework for soil organic carbon stock change assessment. Carbon Management, 15(1), 2410812.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, W., & MacAskill, K. (2025). Accounting and management of city carbon emissions: Trajectories towards advanced data use. Sustainable Cities and Society, 131, 106677.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., ... & Zhou, B. (2021). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2(1), 2391. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_FrontMatter.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, J., Yang, L. H., Ye, F. F., & Wang, Y. M. (2025). Analyzing carbon emission reduction paths in China using interpretable machine learning: A perspective of carbon emission prediction and efficiency evaluation. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-41.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, L., Chen, H., & Guo, Y. (2025). Predicting China’s Provincial Carbon Peak: An Integrated Approach Using Extended STIRPAT and GA-BiLSTM Models. Sustainability, 17(15), 6819.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cordova, C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Merello, P. (2021). Contextual and corporate governance effects on carbon accounting and carbon performance in emerging economies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 536-550.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Das, D. K. (2025). Integrating IoT and AI for Sustainable Energy-Efficient Smart Building: Potential, Barriers and Strategic Pathways. Sustainability, 17(22), 10313.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Gilio, A., Palmisani, J., Pulimeno, M., Cerino, F., Cacace, M., Miani, A., & de Gennaro, G. (2021). CO$^2$ concentration monitoring inside educational buildings as a strategic tool to reduce the risk of Sars-CoV-2 airborne transmission. Environmental research, 202, 111560.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ene Yalçın, S. (2024). Development of a forecasting framework based on advanced machine learning algorithms for greenhouse gas emissions. Systems, 12(12), 528.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fay, C. D., Corcoran, B., & Diamond, D. (2023). Green IoT event detection for carbon-emission monitoring in sensor networks. Sensors, 24(1), 162.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Franco, C., Melica, G., Treville, A., Baldi, M. G., Pisoni, E., Bertoldi, P., & Thiel, C. (2022). Prediction of greenhouse gas emissions for cities and local municipalities monitoring their advances to mitigate and adapt to climate change. Sustainable Cities and Society, 86, 104114.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bastien, D., Licina, D., Bourikas, L., Crosby, S., Gauthier, S., Mino-Rodriguez, I., & Piselli, C. (2024). The impact of real-time carbon dioxide awareness on occupant behavior and ventilation rates in student dwellings. Energy and Buildings, 310, 114132.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, Z., Cui, B., Xu, L., Wang, J., & Guo, Z. (2023). Coupling LSTM and CNN neural networks for accurate carbon emission prediction in 30 Chinese provinces. Sustainability, 15(18), 13934.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2022). Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 261-298.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, Y., Wang, B., Yang, Y., & Yang, L. (2024). A novel approach for predicting CO$^2$ emissions in the building industry using a hybrid multi-strategy improved particle swarm optimization–long short-term memory model. u(17), 4379.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sireesha, M., & Sheik, A. G. (2025). Understanding the Agriculture Sectors of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Prediction in the Global Scenario: Insights from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Atmospheric Pollution Research, 102792.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the association for information systems, 37.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Knapp, W. J., Stevenson, E. I., Renforth, P., Ascough, P. L., Knight, A. C., Bridgestock, L., ... & Tipper, E. T. (2023). Quantifying CO2 removal at enhanced weathering sites: a multiproxy approach. Environmental science & technology, 57(26), 9854-9864.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kong, F., Song, J., & Yang, Z. (2022). A daily carbon emission prediction model combining two-stage feature selection and optimized extreme learning machine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(58), 87983-87997.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Körner, M. F., Leinauer, C., Ströher, T., & Strüker, J. (2025). Digital Measuring, Reporting, and Verification (dMRV) for Decarbonization. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 67(5), 753-765.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumari, S., & Singh, S. K. (2023). Machine learning-based time series models for effective CO$^2$ emission prediction in India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(55), 116601-116616.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spachos, P., & Hatzinakos, D. (2015). Real-time indoor carbon dioxide monitoring through cognitive wireless sensor networks. IEEE sensors journal, 16(2), 506-514.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 17(4), 2347-2376.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, G., Chen, R., Xu, P., Fu, Y., Mao, C., & Hong, J. (2020). Real-time carbon emission monitoring in prefabricated construction. Automation in Construction, 110, 102945.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Y., Yang, X., Du, E., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Yang, C., ... & Liu, C. (2024). A review on carbon emission accounting approaches for the electricity power industry. Applied Energy, 359, 122681.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Z., Fei, J., Du, Y., Ong, K. L., & Arisian, S. (2024). A near real-time carbon accounting framework for the decarbonization of maritime transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 191, 103724.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, Q., Shi, J., Li, W., Xiao, S., Song, K., Zhang, Y., ... & Lai, X. (2024). An efficient tool for real-time global carbon neutrality with credibility of delicacy management: A Modelx+ MRV+ O system. Applied Energy, 372, 123763.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk. Accounting & Finance, 61(2), 2891-2934.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo, Y., Shen, J., Liang, H., Sun, L., & Dong, L. (2024). Carbon monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) for cleaner built environment: Developing a solar photovoltaic blockchain tool and applications in Hong Kong's building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 471, 143456.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, Y., Ma, X., Shu, L., Yang, Q., Zhang, Y., Huo, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Internet of things for noise mapping in smart cities: state of the art and future directions. IEEE Network, 34(4), 112-118.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Marquez-Zepeda, M. J., Santos-Ruiz, I., Pérez-Pérez, E. J., Navarro-Díaz, A., & Delgado-Aguiñaga, J. A. (2025). Internet-of-Things-Based CO2 Monitoring and Forecasting System for Indoor Air Quality Management. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 30(2), 36.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Woo, J., Fatima, R., Kibert, C. J., Newman, R. E., Tian, Y., & Srinivasan, R. S. (2021). Applying blockchain technology for building energy performance measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and the carbon credit market: A review of the literature. Building and environment, 205, 108199.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mota, A., Serôdio, C., Briga-Sá, A., & Valente, A. (2025). Implementation of an Internet of Things architecture to monitor indoor air quality: A case study during sleep periods. Sensors, 25(6), 1683.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, Q., & Luo, L. (2014). Carbon management systems and carbon mitigation. Australian Accounting Review, 24(1), 84-98.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372, n71.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Perosa, B., Newton, P., & da Silva, R. F. B. (2023). A monitoring, reporting and verification system for low carbon agriculture: A case study from Brazil. Environmental science & policy, 140, 286-296.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yavari, A., Mirza, I. B., Bagha, H., Korala, H., Dia, H., Scifleet, P., ... & Shafiei, M. (2023). ArtEMon: artificial intelligence and internet of things powered greenhouse gas sensing for real-time emissions monitoring. Sensors, 23(18), 7971.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pourrahmani, H., Amiri, M. T., Madi, H., & Owusu, J. P. (2025). Revolutionizing carbon sequestration: Integrating IoT, AI, and blockchain technologies in the fight against climate change. Energy Reports, 13, 5952-5967.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reershemius, T., Kelland, M. E., Jordan, J. S., Davis, I. R., D’Ascanio, R., Kalderon-Asael, B., ... & Planavsky, N. J. (2023). Initial validation of a soil-based mass-balance approach for empirical monitoring of enhanced rock weathering rates. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(48), 19497-19507.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schipper, E. L. F., Revi, A., Preston, B. L., Carr, E. R., Eriksen, S. E. H., Fernandez-Carril, L. R., Glavovic, B., Hilmi, N., Ley, D., Mukerji, R., Silvia Muylaert de Araujo, M., Perez, R., Rose, S. K., Singh, P., & Tebboth, M. (2022). Chapter 18: Climate Resilient Development Pathways. In IPCC WGII Sixth Assessment Report Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_SOD_Chapter18.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ye, L., Du, P., & Wang, S. (2024). Industrial carbon emission forecasting considering external factors based on linear and machine learning models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140010.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J., & Séférian, R. (2019). Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets. Nature, 571(7765), 335-342.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A., ... & Cheng, T. (2016). Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges. ISPRS journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115, 119-133.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Grassi, G., House, J., Kurz, W. A., Cescatti, A., Houghton, R. A., Peters, G. P., ... & Zaehle, S. (2018). Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO$_2$ sinks. Nature Climate Change, 8(10), 914-920.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Thornbush, M., & Govind, A. (2025). Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) Protocols Used in Carbon Trading Applied to Dryland Nations in the Global South for Climate Change Mitigation. Sustainability, 17(24), 11001.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Netz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., & Meyer, L. A. (2007). Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20083115500
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, J., Tan, Y., Yu, J., Yu, H., Wang, M., & Zhou, M. (2025). A deep hybrid prediction framework for building operational carbon emissions: Integrating enhanced extreme learning machines. Energy Reports, 13, 4126-4140.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gillenwater, M., Broekhoff, D., Trexler, M., Hyman, J., & Fowler, R. (2007). Policing the voluntary carbon market. Nature Climate Change, 1(711), 85-87.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Woo, J., Kibert, C. J., Newman, R., Kachi, A. S. K., Fatima, R., & Tian, Y. (2020, September). A new blockchain digital MRV (measurement, reporting, and verification) architecture for existing building energy performance. In 2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS) (pp. 222-226). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wu, Z., Wang, J., He, Q., & Chen, X. (2025). Establishing an implementation framework for dynamic carbon monitoring in the AEC industry. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 76, 104289.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International journal of information management, 53, 102104.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Xiao, L., Yazdi, P. G., & Thiede, S. (2025). A dynamic CO$^2$ mapping system with real-time location system for smart factory. Procedia CIRP, 134, 891-896.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kuan, K. L., Xu, Y., Zheng, C., Chan, J. S. M., Cheng, J. C., & Lau, A. K. H. (2024, July). A blockchain-based approach for embodied carbon management along the construction supply chain. In EC3 Conference 2024 (Vol. 5, pp. 0-0). European Council on Computing in Construction. https://ec-3.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/EC32024_187.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang, W., Chen, L., Ke, T., He, H., Li, D., Liu, K., & Li, H. (2024). Carbon emission trend prediction for regional cities in Jiangsu Province based on the random Forest model. Sustainability, 16(23), 10450.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tabaku, E., Vyshka, E., Kapçiu, R., Shehi, A., & Smajli, E. (2025). Utilizing artificial intelligence in energy management systems to improve carbon emission reduction and sustainability. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(1), 393-405.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao, J., Kou, L., Wang, H., He, X., Xiong, Z., Liu, C., & Cui, H. (2022). Carbon emission prediction model and analysis in the Yellow River basin based on a machine learning method. Sustainability, 14(10), 6153.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhu, Y., Al-Ahmed, S. A., Shakir, M. Z., & Olszewska, J. I. (2022). LSTM-based IoT-enabled CO2 steady-state forecasting for indoor air quality monitoring. Electronics, 12(1), 107.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Chaparika, T. S., & Gondo, M.(2026). Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions Monitoring and Forecasting: a Systematic Review of Smart Environmental Accounting Systems. Journal of Carbon Neutrality, 1(2), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.62762/JCN.2026.644506
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Chaparika, Tsitsi Shannon
AU  - Gondo, Monika
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/30
TI  - Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions Monitoring and Forecasting: a Systematic Review of Smart Environmental Accounting Systems
JO  - Journal of Carbon Neutrality
T2  - Journal of Carbon Neutrality
JF  - Journal of Carbon Neutrality
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SP  - 64
EP  - 82
DO  - 10.62762/JCN.2026.644506
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JCN.2026.644506
KW  - smart environmental monitoring systems
KW  - Internet of Things (IoT)
KW  - carbon emissions monitoring
KW  - carbon accounting
AB  - The growing urgency of climate change mitigation has increased pressure to develop reliable systems capable of monitoring and predicting carbon emissions. Conventional carbon accounting methods based on manual reporting and periodic environmental assessments frequently produce delayed and incomplete emissions data. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. It examines existing literature on the application of digital technologies for carbon monitoring and management. The review focuses on Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, artificial intelligence (AI) forecasting models, carbon accounting frameworks and integrated digital carbon management systems. A structured search of five major academic databases yielded 100 peer-reviewed studies, selected and analysed across four thematic areas. Results demonstrate that IoT technologies effectively support real-time environmental monitoring and AI models reliably predict emissions trends. However, the literature reveals persistent weaknesses in the integration of monitoring systems with carbon accounting models. This review identifies critical research gaps and calls for the development of unified IoT–AI platforms to support accurate carbon management and climate governance.
SN  - pending
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Chaparika2026Internet,
  author = {Tsitsi Shannon Chaparika and Monika Gondo},
  title = {Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions Monitoring and Forecasting: a Systematic Review of Smart Environmental Accounting Systems},
  journal = {Journal of Carbon Neutrality},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {64-82},
  doi = {10.62762/JCN.2026.644506},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JCN.2026.644506},
  abstract = {The growing urgency of climate change mitigation has increased pressure to develop reliable systems capable of monitoring and predicting carbon emissions. Conventional carbon accounting methods based on manual reporting and periodic environmental assessments frequently produce delayed and incomplete emissions data. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. It examines existing literature on the application of digital technologies for carbon monitoring and management. The review focuses on Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, artificial intelligence (AI) forecasting models, carbon accounting frameworks and integrated digital carbon management systems. A structured search of five major academic databases yielded 100 peer-reviewed studies, selected and analysed across four thematic areas. Results demonstrate that IoT technologies effectively support real-time environmental monitoring and AI models reliably predict emissions trends. However, the literature reveals persistent weaknesses in the integration of monitoring systems with carbon accounting models. This review identifies critical research gaps and calls for the development of unified IoT–AI platforms to support accurate carbon management and climate governance.},
  keywords = {smart environmental monitoring systems, Internet of Things (IoT), carbon emissions monitoring, carbon accounting},
  issn = {pending},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
120
PDF Downloads
53

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Journal of Carbon Neutrality
Journal of Carbon Neutrality
ISSN: pending (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico