Volume 1, Issue 1, Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024: 5-16

Open Access | Perspective | 08 December 2025
Intersecting Inequities: Gender Inequality and Ethical Dimensions of Sustainability
1 Department of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Kathmandu, Nepal
2 Atlantic States Legal Foundation Inc, United States
* Corresponding Author: Medani Bhandari, [email protected]
ARK: ark:/57805/jetcc.2025.133581
Received: 05 August 2025, Accepted: 11 August 2025, Published: 08 December 2025  
Abstract
This paper critically explores the urgent intersection between gender inequality and the ethical challenges surrounding sustainability, emphasizing the need for an inclusive approach to global sustainable development. While sustainability aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising future generations, ethical oversight often neglects the systemic and structural gender disparities embedded in socio-economic and environmental systems. The paper begins by examining the historical and structural roots of gender inequality, analyzing how patriarchal norms and socio-political exclusion have systematically marginalized women and gender-diverse individuals from decision-making, land ownership, education, and access to technology. These disparities have profound implications for sustainability, particularly in areas such as resource management, climate adaptation, food security, and energy justice, where women are disproportionately affected yet remain underrepresented in leadership. The second section elaborates on the ethical principles of sustainability—intergenerational justice, equity, environmental integrity, and participatory governance—through a gendered lens. It critiques the failure of many sustainability initiatives and policies to incorporate gender justice as a core ethical imperative. The paper argues that addressing gender inequality is not only a moral responsibility but also a practical necessity for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). By ensuring that all voices are heard and all needs are met, gender-inclusive sustainability frameworks can lead to more effective and sustainable solutions. Drawing on case studies from different regions, the third section highlights both the challenges and transformative possibilities when gender perspectives are integrated into sustainability strategies. The final section offers a framework for ethical and inclusive sustainability that recognizes diverse knowledge systems, prioritizes gender-responsive governance, and ensures equitable participation in decision-making processes. It also emphasizes the crucial role that women and gender-diverse individuals play in sustainability transitions, underscoring the need for their inclusion in all aspects of sustainability planning and implementation. This paper calls for a paradigm shift toward an intersectional, ethical sustainability model—one that centers justice, inclusion, and dignity for all genders as foundational pillars for a resilient and equitable future, offering transformative potential.

Keywords
gender inequality
sustainability ethics
intersectionality
social justice
equity and inclusion
environmental justice
sustainable development
feminist perspectives

Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.

Funding
This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest
Uma Sharma is an employee of Department of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Kathmandu, Nepal, and Medani Bhandari is an employee of Atlantic States Legal Foundation Inc, United States. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agarwal, B. (2010). Gender and green governance: the political economy of women's presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Leach, M. (2007). Earth mother myths and other ecofeminist fables: How a strategic notion rose and fell. Development and change, 38(1), 67-85.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Women, U. N. (2020). Gender equality: Women’s rights in review 25 years after Beijing. UN Women.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and change, 30(3), 435-464.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Dankelman, I. (Ed.). (2010). Gender and climate change: An introduction. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhandari, M. P. (2022). Reducing inequalities towards sustainable development goals: multilevel approach. River Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhandari, M.P. (2023). Women and society a major field of studies to understand the discrimination. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(2), 78-93.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhandari, M. P. (2024). Feminisms in social sciences. In Women and society. IntechOpen.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological economics, 48(4), 369-384.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crenshaw, K. (2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist legal theories (pp. 23-51). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. OUP Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lerner, G. (1986). The Creation of Patriarchy Oxford University Press. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sylvia, F. (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn, Autonomedia.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Behrman, J., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Wilde, V., Noordeloos, M., ... & Beintema, N. (2011). Engendering agricultural research, development and extension (Vol. 176). Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bharti, S. S. (2022). Development Challenges in South Asia: A Contemporary Discussion on Gender Inequality. UR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 24(3), 83-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. UNESCO. (2021). The gender gap in education: Progress and challenges. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org
    [Google Scholar]
  20. UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2023). Women in parliament: 2023. Inter-Parliamentary Union. Retrieved from https://www.ipu.org
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Alston, M. (2014, November). Gender mainstreaming and climate change. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 47, pp. 287-294). Pergamon.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  23. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global environmental change, 21(2), 744-751.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  24. Denton, F. (2002). Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter?. Gender & Development, 10(2), 10-20.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  25. FAO. (2022). The status of women in agrifood systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551-566.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  27. Beckerman, W., & Pasek, J. (2001). Justice, posterity, and the environment. OUP Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  29. Shiva, V. (2016). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. North Atlantic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Plumwood, V. (2002). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world (Vol. 31). Columbia university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist studies, 18(1), 119-158.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  34. Sekine, K., & Hodgkin, M. E. (2017). Effect of child marriage on girls' school dropout in Nepal: Analysis of data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2014. PloS one, 12(7), e0180176.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  35. Fikree, F. F., & Pasha, O. (2004). Role of gender in health disparity: the South Asian context. Bmj, 328(7443), 823-826.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  36. Jejeebhoy, S. J., Santhya, K. G., & Sabarwal, S. (2013). Gender-based violence: A qualitative exploration of norms, experiences and positive deviance.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  37. Nelson, V., Meadows, K., Cannon, T., Morton, J., & Martin, A. (2002). Uncertain predictions, invisible impacts, and the need to mainstream gender in climate change adaptations. Gender & Development, 10(2), 51-59.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson, J., Madill, A., Koutsopoulou, G. Z., Brown, C., & Harris, R. (2020). Tackling gender imbalance in psychology. Psychologist, 33, 5-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Cornwall, A., & Rivas, A. M. (2015). From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’to global justice: reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third world quarterly, 36(2), 396-415.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  40. Prokopy, L. S. (2005). The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World development, 33(11), 1801-1819.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  41. UNDP. (2018). Gender and climate change: Overview. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org
    [Google Scholar]
  42. True, J. (2012). The political economy of violence against women. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gaillard, J. C., & Texier, P. (2010). Religions, natural hazards, and disasters: An introduction. Religion, 40(2), 81-84.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  44. Whyte, K. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English language notes, 55(1), 153-162.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (3rd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Simpson, L. B. (2011). Dancing on our turtle's back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Arbeiter Ring Pub..
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hankivsky, O., Reid, C., Cormier, R., Varcoe, C., Clark, N., Benoit, C., & Brotman, S. (2010). Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women's health research. International journal for equity in health, 9(1), 5.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  48. Kaijser, A., & Kronsell, A. (2014). Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environmental politics, 23(3), 417-433.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  49. Rubin, M. M., & Bartle, J. R. (2023). Gender‐responsive budgeting: A budget reform to address gender inequity. Public Administration, 101(2), 391-405.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  50. UN Women. (2019). Gender equality and the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. Retrieved from https://www.unwomen.org
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Crenshaw, K. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence (pp. 93-118). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (2013). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experience. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Ackerly, B. A., Stern, M., & True, J. (Eds.). (2006). Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tronto, J. (2020). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  55. Sultana, F. (2014). Gendering climate change: Geographical insights. The Professional Geographer, 66(3), 372-381.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  56. Lambrou, Y., & Piana, G. (2006). Gender: The missing component of the response to climate change. FAO. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org
    [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Sharma, U., & Bhandari, M. (2025). Intersecting Inequities: Gender Inequality and Ethical Dimensions of Sustainability. Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change, 1(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.62762/JETCC.2025.133581
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Sharma, Uma
AU  - Bhandari, Medani
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/12/08
TI  - Intersecting Inequities: Gender Inequality and Ethical Dimensions of Sustainability
JO  - Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change
T2  - Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change
JF  - Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SP  - 5
EP  - 16
DO  - 10.62762/JETCC.2025.133581
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JETCC.2025.133581
KW  - gender inequality
KW  - sustainability ethics
KW  - intersectionality
KW  - social justice
KW  - equity and inclusion
KW  - environmental justice
KW  - sustainable development
KW  - feminist perspectives
AB  - This paper critically explores the urgent intersection between gender inequality and the ethical challenges surrounding sustainability, emphasizing the need for an inclusive approach to global sustainable development. While sustainability aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising future generations, ethical oversight often neglects the systemic and structural gender disparities embedded in socio-economic and environmental systems. The paper begins by examining the historical and structural roots of gender inequality, analyzing how patriarchal norms and socio-political exclusion have systematically marginalized women and gender-diverse individuals from decision-making, land ownership, education, and access to technology. These disparities have profound implications for sustainability, particularly in areas such as resource management, climate adaptation, food security, and energy justice, where women are disproportionately affected yet remain underrepresented in leadership. The second section elaborates on the ethical principles of sustainability—intergenerational justice, equity, environmental integrity, and participatory governance—through a gendered lens. It critiques the failure of many sustainability initiatives and policies to incorporate gender justice as a core ethical imperative. The paper argues that addressing gender inequality is not only a moral responsibility but also a practical necessity for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). By ensuring that all voices are heard and all needs are met, gender-inclusive sustainability frameworks can lead to more effective and sustainable solutions. Drawing on case studies from different regions, the third section highlights both the challenges and transformative possibilities when gender perspectives are integrated into sustainability strategies. The final section offers a framework for ethical and inclusive sustainability that recognizes diverse knowledge systems, prioritizes gender-responsive governance, and ensures equitable participation in decision-making processes. It also emphasizes the crucial role that women and gender-diverse individuals play in sustainability transitions, underscoring the need for their inclusion in all aspects of sustainability planning and implementation. This paper calls for a paradigm shift toward an intersectional, ethical sustainability model—one that centers justice, inclusion, and dignity for all genders as foundational pillars for a resilient and equitable future, offering transformative potential.
SN  - request pending
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Sharma2025Intersecti,
  author = {Uma Sharma and Medani Bhandari},
  title = {Intersecting Inequities: Gender Inequality and Ethical Dimensions of Sustainability},
  journal = {Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {5-16},
  doi = {10.62762/JETCC.2025.133581},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JETCC.2025.133581},
  abstract = {This paper critically explores the urgent intersection between gender inequality and the ethical challenges surrounding sustainability, emphasizing the need for an inclusive approach to global sustainable development. While sustainability aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising future generations, ethical oversight often neglects the systemic and structural gender disparities embedded in socio-economic and environmental systems. The paper begins by examining the historical and structural roots of gender inequality, analyzing how patriarchal norms and socio-political exclusion have systematically marginalized women and gender-diverse individuals from decision-making, land ownership, education, and access to technology. These disparities have profound implications for sustainability, particularly in areas such as resource management, climate adaptation, food security, and energy justice, where women are disproportionately affected yet remain underrepresented in leadership. The second section elaborates on the ethical principles of sustainability—intergenerational justice, equity, environmental integrity, and participatory governance—through a gendered lens. It critiques the failure of many sustainability initiatives and policies to incorporate gender justice as a core ethical imperative. The paper argues that addressing gender inequality is not only a moral responsibility but also a practical necessity for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). By ensuring that all voices are heard and all needs are met, gender-inclusive sustainability frameworks can lead to more effective and sustainable solutions. Drawing on case studies from different regions, the third section highlights both the challenges and transformative possibilities when gender perspectives are integrated into sustainability strategies. The final section offers a framework for ethical and inclusive sustainability that recognizes diverse knowledge systems, prioritizes gender-responsive governance, and ensures equitable participation in decision-making processes. It also emphasizes the crucial role that women and gender-diverse individuals play in sustainability transitions, underscoring the need for their inclusion in all aspects of sustainability planning and implementation. This paper calls for a paradigm shift toward an intersectional, ethical sustainability model—one that centers justice, inclusion, and dignity for all genders as foundational pillars for a resilient and equitable future, offering transformative potential.},
  keywords = {gender inequality, sustainability ethics, intersectionality, social justice, equity and inclusion, environmental justice, sustainable development, feminist perspectives},
  issn = {request pending},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 1589
PDF Downloads: 188

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change

Journal of Environmentalism, Transformation, and Climate Change

ISSN: request pending (Online) | ISSN: request pending (Print)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/