Equivalent Modeling and Typical Scenario Screening of Wind Farms for the Stability Control Strategy Verification
Research Article  ·  Published: 24 August 2026
Issue cover
ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability
Volume 2, Issue 3, 2026: 207-
Research Article Free to Read

Equivalent Modeling and Typical Scenario Screening of Wind Farms for the Stability Control Strategy Verification

1 State Grid Electric Power Research Institute (NARI Group Corporation), Nanjing 211106, China
* Corresponding Author: Xijian Dong, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 3
You have access to this article · Limited-Time Free Access

Article Information

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel equivalent modeling framework for wind farms, specifically designed for the ``grid simulation with physical security and stability control device'' co-simulation environment. As the scope of stability control expands from the farm level to individual feeders and turbines, conventional equivalent models are inadequate for validating advanced strategies. To address this issue, a framework is proposed that integrates the architecture and operational principles of security and stability control systems. Within the scope of centralized renewable energy transmission grids, a technical route for equivalent modeling of wind farms that incorporates stability control actions is presented, adopting a five-machine equivalent method. Furthermore, a typical scenario selection method based on two-dimensional Kernel Density Estimation (2D-KDE) is developed, utilizing the active power recovery characteristics of the equivalent model. The efficacy of the proposed method is validated on an extended IEEE 10-machine 39-bus system.

Graphical Abstract

Equivalent Modeling and Typical Scenario Screening of Wind Farms for the Stability Control Strategy Verification

Keywords

wind farms stability control strategy verification equivalent modeling security and stability control system typical scenario

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technical Research Service Project of SGCC under Grant SGZB0000GDJS2601136.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors are affiliated with the State Grid Electric Power Research Institute (NARI Group Corporation), Nanjing 211106, China. The authors declare that this affiliation had no influence on the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or the decision to publish, and that no other competing interests exist.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. D., Al-Ismail, F. S., Shafiullah, M., Al-Sulaiman, F. A., & El-Amin, I. M. (2020). Grid integration challenges of wind energy: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 10857-10878. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Saleem, M. I., Saha, S., Roy, T. K., & Ghosh, S. K. (2024). Assessment and management of frequency stability in low inertia renewable energy rich power grids. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 18(7), 1372-1390. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aljarrah, R., Fawaz, B. B., Salem, Q., Karimi, M., Marzooghi, H., & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, R. (2024). Issues and challenges of grid-following converters interfacing renewable energy sources in low inertia systems: A review. IEEE Access, 12, 5534-5561. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. State Administration for Market Regulation, & Standardization Administration of China. (2024). Inspection specification for security and stability control system of power system (GB/T 22384-2024). Retrieved from https://codeofchina.com/standard/GBT22384-2024.html
    [Google Scholar]
  5. He, J., Xu, H., Liu, Q., & Ren, J. (2024, October). Unified Simulation and Verification Technology for Primary and Secondary Control in Power Systems Based on Digital Stability Control System. In 2024 IEEE PES 16th Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zou, J., Peng, C., Yan, Y., Zheng, H., & Li, Y. (2014). A survey of dynamic equivalent modeling for wind farm. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 956-963. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Uddin, M. H., Khalid, J., Smailes, M., Liang, J., & Wang, S. (2026). Accurate and computationally efficient aggregated modelling of offshore wind farms for grid compliance. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, P. H., Jia, R., Cao, G., Ming, B., Guo, Y., Wang, S. K., & Li, W. (2025). A novel perspective for equivalent aggregation of wind farm: Measuring the dynamic similarity between output time-series. Applied Energy, 392, 125958. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Gu, W., Mili, L., Sun, B., & Lu, S. (2025). A tensor-based clustering method for dynamic equivalent modeling of wind farms. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 17(2), 1075-1089, [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao, Z., & Chen, Z. (2026). Research on aggregated modeling of wind farms considering dynamic coupling characteristics and stability optimization in weak grid environments. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 45(2), 403--428. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Teng, W., Wang, X., Meng, Y., & Shi, W. (2019). An improved support vector clustering approach to dynamic aggregation of large wind farms. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 5(2), 215-223. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. TingYun, G., HaoQian, G., Qiang, F., & ShuRan, Z. (2024, November). Modeling the equivalent of doubly fed wind turbine clusters using the K-means algorithm. In 2024 IEEE 8th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2) (pp. 1296-1301). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, J., Yan, T., Li, R., Meng, C., Tang, X., & Li, Z. (2023, November). KPCA-Based Hybrid Data-Model Driven Wind Farm Equivalence Modeling. In 2023 China Automation Congress (CAC) (pp. 630-635). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rahman, M. T., Hasan, K. N., & Sokolowski, P. (2022). Evaluation of wind farm aggregation using probabilistic clustering algorithms for power system stability assessment. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 30, 100678. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta, A. P., Mitra, A., Mohapatra, A., & Singh, S. N. (2022). A multi-machine equivalent model of a wind farm considering LVRT characteristic and wake effect. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 13(3), 1396-1407. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, W., Chao, P., Liang, X., Ma, J., Xu, D., & Jin, X. (2017). A practical equivalent method for DFIG wind farms. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 9(2), 610-620. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chao, P., Li, W., Liang, X., Xu, S., & Shuai, Y. (2021). An analytical two-machine equivalent method of DFIG-based wind power plants considering complete FRT processes. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(4), 3657-3667. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jin, Y., Wu, D., Ju, P., Rehtanz, C., Wu, F., & Pan, X. (2019). Modeling of wind speeds inside a wind farm with application to wind farm aggregate modeling considering LVRT characteristic. IEEE transactions on energy conversion, 35(1), 508-519. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zheng, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, Z., & Cao, T. (2014). Hierarchical protection control system of smart substations. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2(3), 282-288. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, Q., Li, M., Xu, J., & Jian, F. (2024, October). Model Simplification and Time Complexity Reducing Method For Security and Stability Control Systems. In 2024 IEEE PES 16th Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. National Energy Administration. (2020). Technical specification for design and application of power system safety and stability control system (DL/T 2193-2020). Retrieved from https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF/English.aspx/DLT2193-2020
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, L., Li, L., Chen, B., Yu, H., Sun, W., Zhang, M., ... & Cheng, S. (2024, October). Aggregation Equivalence Method for New Energy Stations Based on PSASP Modelling Loss Consistency. In 2024 7th International Conference on Power and Energy Applications (ICPEA) (pp. 668-673). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, & Standardization Administration of China. (2011). Technical rule for connecting wind farm to power system (GB/T 19963-2011). Retrieved from https://www.codeofchina.com/standard/GBT19963-2011.html
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin, Y. L., Jiang, C. J., Ye, X. B., Zheng, J. H., & Xiahou, K. S. (2024, December). A combination of auxiliary circuits and reactive current control to improve low voltage crossing ability of offshore wind grid connection system. In IET Conference Proceedings CP910 (Vol. 2024, No. 33, pp. 420-425). Stevenage, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lai, Q., Shen, C., & Li, D. (2024). Dynamic modeling and stability analysis for repeated LVRT process of wind turbine based on switched system theory. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 40(3), 2711-2723. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo, Z., Fang, T., Liu, X., Zhao, Z., Yuan, B., & Wang, Y. (2025, August). Multi-Machine Equivalent Model for Impedance Analysis of Wind Farms. In 2025 5th Power System and Green Energy Conference (PSGEC) (pp. 73-77). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Brochu, J., Larose, C., & Gagnon, R. (2010). Validation of single-and multiple-machine equivalents for modeling wind power plants. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 26(2), 532-541. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, X., Peng, J., Qi, J., Zhang, L., Zhu, Y., & Luo, C. (2025, April). Aggregate equivalent modeling of wind farm under full wind speed scenarios. In 2025 8th International Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering (CEEPE) (pp. 448-453). IEEE. [
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

APA Style
Dong, X., Wu, J., Ma, Y., Feng, J., Li, Y., Lei, M., & Deng, K. (2026). Equivalent Modeling and Typical Scenario Screening of Wind Farms for the Stability Control Strategy Verification. ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability, 2(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.62762/TSSR.2026.528149
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dong, Xijian
AU  - Wu, Jialong
AU  - Ma, Yuqi
AU  - Feng, Jiaqi
AU  - Li, Yajie
AU  - Lei, Ming
AU  - Deng, Kui
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/24
TI  - Equivalent Modeling and Typical Scenario Screening of Wind Farms for the Stability Control Strategy Verification
JO  - ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability
T2  - ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability
JF  - ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
SP  - 207
EP  - 
DO  - 10.62762/TSSR.2026.528149
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TSSR.2026.528149
KW  - wind farms
KW  - stability control strategy verification
KW  - equivalent modeling
KW  - security and stability control system
KW  - typical scenario
AB  - This paper proposes a novel equivalent modeling framework for wind farms, specifically designed for the ``grid simulation with physical security and stability control device'' co-simulation environment. As the scope of stability control expands from the farm level to individual feeders and turbines, conventional equivalent models are inadequate for validating advanced strategies. To address this issue, a framework is proposed that integrates the architecture and operational principles of security and stability control systems. Within the scope of centralized renewable energy transmission grids, a technical route for equivalent modeling of wind farms that incorporates stability control actions is presented, adopting a five-machine equivalent method. Furthermore, a typical scenario selection method based on two-dimensional Kernel Density Estimation (2D-KDE) is developed, utilizing the active power recovery characteristics of the equivalent model. The efficacy of the proposed method is validated on an extended IEEE 10-machine 39-bus system.
SN  - 3069-1087
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Dong2026Equivalent,
  author = {Xijian Dong and Jialong Wu and Yuqi Ma and Jiaqi Feng and Yajie Li and Ming Lei and Kui Deng},
  title = {Equivalent Modeling and Typical Scenario Screening of Wind Farms for the Stability Control Strategy Verification},
  journal = {ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {207-},
  doi = {10.62762/TSSR.2026.528149},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TSSR.2026.528149},
  abstract = {This paper proposes a novel equivalent modeling framework for wind farms, specifically designed for the ``grid simulation with physical security and stability control device'' co-simulation environment. As the scope of stability control expands from the farm level to individual feeders and turbines, conventional equivalent models are inadequate for validating advanced strategies. To address this issue, a framework is proposed that integrates the architecture and operational principles of security and stability control systems. Within the scope of centralized renewable energy transmission grids, a technical route for equivalent modeling of wind farms that incorporates stability control actions is presented, adopting a five-machine equivalent method. Furthermore, a typical scenario selection method based on two-dimensional Kernel Density Estimation (2D-KDE) is developed, utilizing the active power recovery characteristics of the equivalent model. The efficacy of the proposed method is validated on an extended IEEE 10-machine 39-bus system.},
  keywords = {wind farms, stability control strategy verification, equivalent modeling, security and stability control system, typical scenario},
  issn = {3069-1087},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
0
Scopus
0
Views
20
PDF Downloads
5

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge (ICCK) or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability
ICCK Transactions on Systems Safety and Reliability
ISSN: 3069-1087 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico