Volume 1, Issue 1, Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025: 4-14

Open Access | Perspective | 09 December 2025
Scientific, Societal, and Spiritual Implications of Finding (or Not Finding) Life on Mars
1 Beacon in the Cosmos LLC, Pasadena, CA 91101, United States
2 Independent Researcher, Irvine, CA 92612, United States
3 Independent Researcher, Vancouver, WA 98662, United States
4 The SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States
5 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
* Corresponding Author: Jonathan H. Jiang, [email protected]
ARK: ark:/57805/jhfc.2025.399040
Received: 21 October 2025, Accepted: 24 October 2025, Published: 09 December 2025  
Abstract
As humanity enters a transformative era of Mars exploration, guided by NASA's Moon-to-Mars roadmap, rapid advances in commercial spaceflight, and the National Academies' Science Strategy for the Human Exploration of Mars (2025), we approach a pivotal moment in the search for extraterrestrial life. Recent in-situ observations from Jezero crater have produced a potential biosignature in fine-grained sediments, while new laboratory studies indicate that relatively pure Martian ice could preserve organic molecules for geologically significant timescales. Together, these developments elevate the near-term stakes: they sharpen targets, raise the bar for planetary protection, and intensify public attention even in the absence of definitive proof. This paper systematically examines the scientific, societal, and spiritual implications of three outcomes: definitive discovery, confirmed absence, or persistent uncertainty. We assess how each pathway would reshape astrobiology and sample-return priorities, recalibrate planetary-protection policies for human missions, and influence international cooperation, ethics, and cultural narratives. Whether Mars ultimately reveals evidence of a second genesis or underscores Earth's exceptional status, the pursuit itself compels deep reflection on our collective identity and responsibilities as planetary stewards, renewing appreciation for life's rarity, resilience, and intrinsic value.

Keywords
Mars exploration
astrobiology
biosignatures
planetary protection
space ethics
Rare Earth hypothesis

Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.

Funding
This work was supported by the Beacon in the Cosmos LLC. Author Stuart F. Taylor thanks the SETI Institute for support, and author Yuk L. Yung acknowledges support from the California Institute of Technology.

Conflicts of Interest
Jonathan H. Jiang is an employee of Beacon in the Cosmos LLC, Pasadena, CA 91101, United States. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1966). A report from Mariner IV [Factsheet]. NASA facts, Vol. III, No. 3. Retrieved November 1, 2025, from https://epizodyspace.ru/bibl/inostr-yazyki/nasa-facts/1966/Mariner_IV.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Levin, G. V., & Straat, P. A. (1976). Viking labeled release biology experiment: interim results. Science, 194(4271), 1322-1329.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  3. Grotzinger, J. P., Sumner, D. Y., Kah, L. C., Stack, K., Gupta, S., Edgar, L., Rubin, D., Lewis, K., Schieber, J., Mangold, N., Milliken, R., Conrad, P. G., DesMarais, D., Farmer, J., Siebach, K., Calef, F., III, Hurowitz, J., McLennan, S. M., Ming, D., \ldots & Moores, J. E. (2014). A habitable fluvio-lacustrine environment at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science, 343(6169), 1242777.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Squyres, S. W., Arvidson, R. E., Bell Iii, J. F., Bruckner, J., Cabrol, N. A., Calvin, W., ... & Yen, A. (2004). The opportunity rover's Athena science investigation at Meridiani Planum, Mars. science, 306(5702), 1698-1703.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Conley, C. A., & Rummel, J. D. (2010). Planetary protection for human exploration of Mars. Acta Astronautica, 66(5-6), 792-797.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Rettberg, P., Rummel, J. D., Vakoch, D. A., & Williamson, P. (2019). Biological contamination prevention for Mars. In Ensuring the Scientific Integrity of Mars Sample Return (pp. 23--37). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2025). NASA says Mars rover discovered potential biosignature last year [Press release]. Retrieved November 1, 2025, from https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-says-mars-rover-discovered-potential-biosignature-last-year/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Farley, K. A., Williford, K. H., Stack, K. M., Bhartia, R., Chen, A., de la Torre, M., ... & Wiens, R. C. (2020). Mars 2020 mission overview. Space Science Reviews, 216(8), 142.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Imperial College London. (2025). Scientists just found the strongest signs of life on Mars yet. Space.com. Retrieved November 1, 2025, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/09/250930034204.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ward, P. D., & Brownlee, D. (2000). Rare Earth: Why complex life is uncommon in the universe. New York, NY: Springer New York.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Westall, F., Foucher, F., Bost, N., Bertrand, M., Loizeau, D., Vago, J. L., ... & Cockell, C. S. (2015). Biosignatures on Mars: what, where, and how? Implications for the search for martian life. Astrobiology, 15(11), 998-1029.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  12. Benner, S. A., Devine, K. G., Matveeva, L. N., & Powell, D. H. (2000). The missing organic molecules on Mars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(6), 2425-2430.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  13. Cleland, C. E., & Copley, S. D. (2005). The possibility of alternative microbial life on Earth. International Journal of Astrobiology, 4(3-4), 165-173.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  14. Deamer, D. (2006). Life in the Universe. Expectations and Constraints. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 36(1), 85-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. National Research Council, Division on Engineering, Physical Sciences, Space Studies Board, & Committee on the Review of Planetary Protection Requirements for Mars Sample Return Missions. (2009). Assessment of planetary protection requirements for Mars sample return missions. National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wickramasinghe, C. (2010). The astrobiological case for our cosmic ancestry. International Journal of Astrobiology, 9(2), 119-129.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  17. Jakosky, B. M., & Phillips, R. J. (2001). Mars' volatile and climate history. nature, 412(6843), 237-244.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  18. McKay, C. P. (2001, November). The search for a second genesis of life in our Solar System. In First Steps in the Origin of Life in the Universe: Proceedings of the Sixth Trieste Conference on Chemical Evolution Trieste, Italy 18--22 September, 2000 (pp. 269-277). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  19. McKay, D. S., Gibson Jr, E. K., Thomas-Keprta, K. L., Vali, H., Romanek, C. S., Clemett, S. J., ... & Zare, R. N. (1996). Search for past life on Mars: possible relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite ALH84001. Science, 273(5277), 924-930.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  20. Hand, K. P., Sotin, C., Hayes, A., & Coustenis, A. (2020). On the habitability and future exploration of ocean worlds. Space science reviews, 216(5), 95.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  21. Seager, S. (2013). Exoplanet habitability. Science, 340(6132), 577-581.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  22. Seager, S. (2014). The future of spectroscopic life detection on exoplanets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12634-12640.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  23. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Origins, worlds, and life: a decadal strategy for planetary science and astrobiology 2023-2032.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Jiang, J. H., Du, G., Rosen, P. E., Taylor, S. F. & Yung, Y. L. (2025). Scientific, Societal, and Spiritual Implications of Finding (or Not Finding) Life on Mars. Journal of Humanity’s Future in the Cosmos, 1(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.62762/JHFC.2025.399040
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jiang, Jonathan H.
AU  - Du, Guannan
AU  - Rosen, Philip E.
AU  - Taylor, Stuart F.
AU  - Yung, Yuk L.
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/12/09
TI  - Scientific, Societal, and Spiritual Implications of Finding (or Not Finding) Life on Mars
JO  - Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos
T2  - Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos
JF  - Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SP  - 4
EP  - 14
DO  - 10.62762/JHFC.2025.399040
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JHFC.2025.399040
KW  - Mars exploration
KW  - astrobiology
KW  - biosignatures
KW  - planetary protection
KW  - space ethics
KW  - Rare Earth hypothesis
AB  - As humanity enters a transformative era of Mars exploration, guided by NASA's Moon-to-Mars roadmap, rapid advances in commercial spaceflight, and the National Academies' Science Strategy for the Human Exploration of Mars (2025), we approach a pivotal moment in the search for extraterrestrial life. Recent in-situ observations from Jezero crater have produced a potential biosignature in fine-grained sediments, while new laboratory studies indicate that relatively pure Martian ice could preserve organic molecules for geologically significant timescales. Together, these developments elevate the near-term stakes: they sharpen targets, raise the bar for planetary protection, and intensify public attention even in the absence of definitive proof. This paper systematically examines the scientific, societal, and spiritual implications of three outcomes: definitive discovery, confirmed absence, or persistent uncertainty. We assess how each pathway would reshape astrobiology and sample-return priorities, recalibrate planetary-protection policies for human missions, and influence international cooperation, ethics, and cultural narratives. Whether Mars ultimately reveals evidence of a second genesis or underscores Earth's exceptional status, the pursuit itself compels deep reflection on our collective identity and responsibilities as planetary stewards, renewing appreciation for life's rarity, resilience, and intrinsic value.
SN  - pending
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Jiang2025Scientific,
  author = {Jonathan H. Jiang and Guannan Du and Philip E. Rosen and Stuart F. Taylor and Yuk L. Yung},
  title = {Scientific, Societal, and Spiritual Implications of Finding (or Not Finding) Life on Mars},
  journal = {Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {4-14},
  doi = {10.62762/JHFC.2025.399040},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JHFC.2025.399040},
  abstract = {As humanity enters a transformative era of Mars exploration, guided by NASA's Moon-to-Mars roadmap, rapid advances in commercial spaceflight, and the National Academies' Science Strategy for the Human Exploration of Mars (2025), we approach a pivotal moment in the search for extraterrestrial life. Recent in-situ observations from Jezero crater have produced a potential biosignature in fine-grained sediments, while new laboratory studies indicate that relatively pure Martian ice could preserve organic molecules for geologically significant timescales. Together, these developments elevate the near-term stakes: they sharpen targets, raise the bar for planetary protection, and intensify public attention even in the absence of definitive proof. This paper systematically examines the scientific, societal, and spiritual implications of three outcomes: definitive discovery, confirmed absence, or persistent uncertainty. We assess how each pathway would reshape astrobiology and sample-return priorities, recalibrate planetary-protection policies for human missions, and influence international cooperation, ethics, and cultural narratives. Whether Mars ultimately reveals evidence of a second genesis or underscores Earth's exceptional status, the pursuit itself compels deep reflection on our collective identity and responsibilities as planetary stewards, renewing appreciation for life's rarity, resilience, and intrinsic value.},
  keywords = {Mars exploration, astrobiology, biosignatures, planetary protection, space ethics, Rare Earth hypothesis},
  issn = {pending},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 334
PDF Downloads: 216

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos

Journal of Humanity's Future in the Cosmos

ISSN: pending (Online) | ISSN: pending (Print)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/