Coherence Thermodynamics: A Phenomenological Framework and a Numerical Field Model for Black-Hole Morphology
Article Information
Abstract
Quantum coherence is increasingly recognised as a thermodynamic resource that free energy alone cannot describe. This work develops a phenomenological thermodynamics for coherence-information (C-I) systems, idealised systems composed only of information and the coherent relations among its elements, and tests a numerical realisation of it against black-hole morphology. A minimum-action postulate, $\Delta C\cdot\Delta I \geq h/\pi$, is combined with a gradient-based semantic entropy and an equipartition-based semantic temperature to formulate five laws and three dimensionally consistent operating modes. For black holes the framework gives a thermodynamic coherence $C_T = 2/(Mc^2)$, which grows as the hole loses mass. A three-dimensional field model encodes U(1), $\mathbb{Z}_2$ and $\mathbb{Z}_3$ symmetry breaking through the geometric phase $m\theta + \omega R + \lambda_{\mathrm{vert}}\cos\phi$ and was examined with grid-convergence tests, control runs with azimuthal orders $m = 1$-$6$ and closed-form predictions. The azimuthal phase contains a phase-defect line on the symmetry axis. Without regularisation, the maximum field gradient scales inversely with the grid spacing and the axial enhancement of the certainty ratio grows with resolution. With a core radius $a \geq 0.5$, all diagnostics converge to within 3%. The number of decoherence maxima is always $2m$, so the six hot-spot-like features follow directly from the choice $m = 3$. Their spiral pitch, $-\omega/m$, and hemispheric twist, $-2\lambda_{\mathrm{vert}}\cos\phi/m$, agree with the simulations to within 9% and 0.3%, respectively. The model therefore maps imposed symmetry parameters onto observable morphology through explicit relations, yielding falsifiable predictions such as a flux quasi-periodicity at $2m$ times the hot-spot orbital frequency, while its astrophysical interpretation remains phenomenological.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
AI Use Statement
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3), 183-191.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Scully, M. O., Zubairy, M. S., Agarwal, G. S., & Walther, H. (2003). Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence. Science, 299(5608), 862-864.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Scully, M. O., Chapin, K. R., Dorfman, K. E., Kim, M. B., & Svidzinsky, A. (2011). Quantum heat engine power can be increased by noise-induced coherence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(37), 15097-15100.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2014). Quantifying coherence. Physical Review Letters, 113(14), 140401.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Lostaglio, M., Jennings, D., & Rudolph, T. (2015). Description of quantum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy. Nature Communications, 6(1), 6383.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Faist, P., Oppenheim, J., & Renner, R. (2015). Gibbs-preserving maps outperform thermal operations in the quantum regime. New Journal of Physics, 17(4), 043003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Tajima, H., & Takagi, R. (2025). Gibbs-preserving operations requiring infinite amount of quantum coherence. Physical Review Letters, 134(17), 170201.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Narasimhachar, V., & Gour, G. (2015). Low-temperature thermodynamics with quantum coherence. Nature communications, 6(1), 7689.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Kurt, C., Sisman, A., & Aydin, A. (2025). Shape-controlled Bose–Einstein condensation. Physica Scripta, 100(1), 015289.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Aydin, A. (2025). Geometry-induced asymmetric level coupling. Physical Review E, 112(1), 014121.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wheeler, J. A. (2018). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. Feynman and computation, 309-336.
[Google Scholar] - Schrodinger, E. (1944). What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://archive.org/details/whatislifephysic0000schr_y5x8
[Google Scholar] - Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D, 7(8), 2333-2346.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Hawking, S. W. (1974). Black hole explosions? Nature, 248(5443), 30-31.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.212159
[Google Scholar] - Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3), 172-198.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal, 27(3), 379-423.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Gour, G., & Spekkens, R. W. (2008). The resource theory of quantum reference frames: Manipulations and monotones. New Journal of Physics, 10(3), 033023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Mehrabpour, H., Giacalone, G., & Luzum, M. W. (2026). Triaxial shapes and the angular structure of nuclear three-body correlations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.00619.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Boltzmann, L. (2012). Über die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung resp. den Sätzen über das Wärmegleichgewicht. In F. Hasenöhrl (Ed.), Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (pp. 164–223). Cambridge University Press.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer. (English translation: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955.) https://archive.org/details/mathematischegru0000vonn/page/n1/mode/2up
[Google Scholar] - Maxwell, J. C. (1871). Theory of Heat. London: Longmans, Green, and Co. https://archive.org/details/B-001-003-070
[Google Scholar] - Gibbs, J. W. (1875-1878). On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 3(96), 108-248; 343-524.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Clausius, R. (1851). I. on the moving force of heat, and the laws regarding the nature of heat itself which are deducible therefrom. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(8), 1-21.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Carnot, S. (1872). Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres à développer cette puissance. In Annales scientifiques de l'École normale supérieure (Vol. 1, pp. 393-457). https://www.numdam.org/item/10.24033/asens.88.pdf
[Google Scholar] - Nernst, W. (1906). Ueber die Berechnung chemischer Gleichgewichte aus thermischen Messungen. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 1906, 1-40. http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/GDZPPN002500655
[Google Scholar] - Nernst, W. (1918). Die theoretischen und experimentellen Grundlagen des neuen Wärmesatzes. Halle: Wilhelm Knapp. https://onebid.de/de/ksiazki-i-starodruki-nernst-w-die-theoretischen-und-experimentellen-grundlagen-des-neuren-warmesatzes-halle-1918/3556293
[Google Scholar] - Planck, M. (1911). Vorlesungen über thermodynamik (3rd ed.). Leipzig: Veit & Comp.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Vopson, M. M. (2019). The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances, 9(9), 095206.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Einstein, A. (1905). Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? Annalen der Physik, 323(13), 639-641.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Nye, J. F., & Berry, M. V. (1974). Dislocations in wave trains. In A Half-Century of Physical Asymptotics and Other Diversions: Selected Works by Michael Berry (pp. 6-31).
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - LeVeque, R. J. (2007). Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations: Steady-State and Time-Dependent Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - James, O., von Tunzelmann, E., Franklin, P., & Thorne, K. S. (2015). Gravitational lensing by spinning black holes in astrophysics, and in the movie Interstellar. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(6), 065001.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Bardeen, J. M. (1973). Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric. Black holes (Les astres occlus), 215-239. https://inis.iaea.org/records/g26q5-w9k04
[Google Scholar] - Hioki, K., & Maeda, K. (2009). Measurement of the Kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object's shadow. Physical Review D, 80(2), 024042.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Joshi, R. K., Debnath, S., & Chattopadhyay, I. (2022). Shocks in radiatively driven time-dependent, relativistic jets around black holes. The Astrophysical Journal, 933(1), 75.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977). Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 179(3), 433-456.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Mertens, F., Lobanov, A. P., Walker, R. C., & Hardee, P. E. (2016). Kinematics of the jet in M 87 on scales of 100–1000 Schwarzschild radii. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 595, A54.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., Baubock, M., Berger, J. P., Bonnet, H., ... & Yazici, S. (2018). Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 618, L10.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Biretta, J. A., Sparks, W. B., & Macchetto, F. (1999). Hubble Space Telescope observations of superluminal motion in the M87 jet. The Astrophysical Journal, 520(2), 621.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Walker, R. C., Hardee, P. E., Davies, F. B., Ly, C., & Junor, W. (2018). The structure and dynamics of the subparsec jet in M87 based on 50 VLBA observations over 17 years at 43 GHz. The Astrophysical Journal, 855(2), 128.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Nakamura, M., Asada, K., Hada, K., Pu, H. Y., Noble, S., Tseng, C., ... & Tazaki, F. (2018). Parabolic jets from the spinning black hole in M87. The Astrophysical Journal, 868(2), 146.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Nikonov, A. S., Kovalev, Y. Y., Kravchenko, E. V., Pashchenko, I. N., & Lobanov, A. P. (2023). Properties of the jet in M87 revealed by its helical structure imaged with the VLBA at 8 and 15 GHz. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 526(4), 5949-5963.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Park, J., Takahashi, K., Toma, K., Hada, K., Nakamura, M., Pu, H. Y., ... & Cho, I. (2026). Helical magnetic field in the acceleration-collimation zone of the M87 jet. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 996(2), L22.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Vincent, F. H., Gralla, S. E., Lupsasca, A., & Wielgus, M. (2022). Images and photon ring signatures of thick disks around black holes. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 667, A170.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Johnson, M. D., Lupsasca, A., Strominger, A., Wong, G. N., Hadar, S., Kapec, D., ... & Moran, J. M. (2020). Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole’s photon ring. Science advances, 6(12), eaaz1310.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Verlinde, E. (2011). On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(4), 029.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Farrah, D., Croker, K. S., Zevin, M., Tarlé, G., Faraoni, V., Petty, S., ... & Weiner, J. (2023). Observational evidence for cosmological coupling of black holes and its implications for an astrophysical source of dark energy. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 944(2), L31.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Croker, K. S., Tarlé, G., Ahlen, S. P., Cartwright, B. G., Farrah, D., Fernandez, N., & Windhorst, R. A. (2024). DESI dark energy time evolution is recovered by cosmologically coupled black holes. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024(10), 094.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR
AU - Barton, Jordan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/11
TI - Coherence Thermodynamics: A Phenomenological Framework and a Numerical Field Model for Black-Hole Morphology
JO - Journal of Numerical Simulations in Physics and Mathematics
T2 - Journal of Numerical Simulations in Physics and Mathematics
JF - Journal of Numerical Simulations in Physics and Mathematics
VL - 3
IS - 1
SP - 60
EP - 72
DO - 10.62762/JNSPM.2026.976035
UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/jnspm.2026.976035
KW - quantum coherence
KW - information thermodynamics
KW - black-hole jets
KW - phase singularity
KW - numerical convergence
AB - Quantum coherence is increasingly recognised as a thermodynamic resource that free energy alone cannot describe. This work develops a phenomenological thermodynamics for coherence-information (C-I) systems, idealised systems composed only of information and the coherent relations among its elements, and tests a numerical realisation of it against black-hole morphology. A minimum-action postulate, $\Delta C\cdot\Delta I \geq h/\pi$, is combined with a gradient-based semantic entropy and an equipartition-based semantic temperature to formulate five laws and three dimensionally consistent operating modes. For black holes the framework gives a thermodynamic coherence $C_T = 2/(Mc^2)$, which grows as the hole loses mass. A three-dimensional field model encodes U(1), $\mathbb{Z}_2$ and $\mathbb{Z}_3$ symmetry breaking through the geometric phase $m\theta + \omega R + \lambda_{\mathrm{vert}}\cos\phi$ and was examined with grid-convergence tests, control runs with azimuthal orders $m = 1$-$6$ and closed-form predictions. The azimuthal phase contains a phase-defect line on the symmetry axis. Without regularisation, the maximum field gradient scales inversely with the grid spacing and the axial enhancement of the certainty ratio grows with resolution. With a core radius $a \geq 0.5$, all diagnostics converge to within 3%. The number of decoherence maxima is always $2m$, so the six hot-spot-like features follow directly from the choice $m = 3$. Their spiral pitch, $-\omega/m$, and hemispheric twist, $-2\lambda_{\mathrm{vert}}\cos\phi/m$, agree with the simulations to within 9% and 0.3%, respectively. The model therefore maps imposed symmetry parameters onto observable morphology through explicit relations, yielding falsifiable predictions such as a flux quasi-periodicity at $2m$ times the hot-spot orbital frequency, while its astrophysical interpretation remains phenomenological.
SN - 3068-9082
PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA - English
ER -
@article{Barton2026Coherence,
author = {Jordan Barton},
title = {Coherence Thermodynamics: A Phenomenological Framework and a Numerical Field Model for Black-Hole Morphology},
journal = {Journal of Numerical Simulations in Physics and Mathematics},
year = {2026},
volume = {3},
number = {1},
pages = {60-72},
doi = {10.62762/JNSPM.2026.976035},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/jnspm.2026.976035},
abstract = {Quantum coherence is increasingly recognised as a thermodynamic resource that free energy alone cannot describe. This work develops a phenomenological thermodynamics for coherence-information (C-I) systems, idealised systems composed only of information and the coherent relations among its elements, and tests a numerical realisation of it against black-hole morphology. A minimum-action postulate, \$\Delta C\cdot\Delta I \geq h/\pi\$, is combined with a gradient-based semantic entropy and an equipartition-based semantic temperature to formulate five laws and three dimensionally consistent operating modes. For black holes the framework gives a thermodynamic coherence \$C\_T = 2/(Mc^2)\$, which grows as the hole loses mass. A three-dimensional field model encodes U(1), \$\mathbb{Z}\_2\$ and \$\mathbb{Z}\_3\$ symmetry breaking through the geometric phase \$m\theta + \omega R + \lambda\_{\mathrm{vert}}\cos\phi\$ and was examined with grid-convergence tests, control runs with azimuthal orders \$m = 1\$-\$6\$ and closed-form predictions. The azimuthal phase contains a phase-defect line on the symmetry axis. Without regularisation, the maximum field gradient scales inversely with the grid spacing and the axial enhancement of the certainty ratio grows with resolution. With a core radius \$a \geq 0.5\$, all diagnostics converge to within 3\%. The number of decoherence maxima is always \$2m\$, so the six hot-spot-like features follow directly from the choice \$m = 3\$. Their spiral pitch, \$-\omega/m\$, and hemispheric twist, \$-2\lambda\_{\mathrm{vert}}\cos\phi/m\$, agree with the simulations to within 9\% and 0.3\%, respectively. The model therefore maps imposed symmetry parameters onto observable morphology through explicit relations, yielding falsifiable predictions such as a flux quasi-periodicity at \$2m\$ times the hot-spot orbital frequency, while its astrophysical interpretation remains phenomenological.},
keywords = {quantum coherence, information thermodynamics, black-hole jets, phase singularity, numerical convergence},
issn = {3068-9082},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Article Metrics
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Portico