Volume 2, Issue 2, ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026: 116-136

Open Access | Review Article | 13 February 2026
Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Based IoT Solutions
1 University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
2 Department of Computer Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
3 College of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Ha’il, Ha’il 2440, Saudi Arabia
* Corresponding Author: Muhammad Khurram Umair, [email protected]
ARK: ark:/57805/tacs.2025.327681
Received: 10 July 2025, Accepted: 22 January 2026, Published: 13 February 2026  
Abstract
The growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has connected a massive number of devices, but its common centralized design creates major security, privacy, and scalability problems that old security methods cannot properly fix. This review explores how Blockchain Technology (BCT) offers a new approach to create trust and strong security for IoT systems without a central authority. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study analyzes 68 research papers and uses a Chi-square test to statistically confirm the link between IoT problems and the use of blockchain solutions. The results show a strong, statistically proven connection, with a Chi-square value of 34.772 (p<0.05) and a Cramer's V of 0.63. Key issues like data integrity, confidentiality, and device identity management are effectively solved by blockchain's features, including smart contracts. The paper also compares leading platforms—IOTA, Ethereum, and Hyperledger—evaluating their pros and cons regarding scalability, speed, and energy use for different IoT applications. This work provides a structured, evidence-based analysis of the Blockchain-IoT landscape, offering critical evaluation that goes beyond simple summaries. It also identifies future research directions, such as combining blockchain with Artificial Intelligence (AI), developing quantum-proof security, and creating universal standards to allow different systems to work together seamlessly.

Graphical Abstract
Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Based IoT Solutions

Keywords
blockchain
IoT
literature review
secure IoT solutions
systematic review

Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.

Funding
This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement
The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. Loukil, F., Ghedira-Guegan, C., Benharkat, A. N., Boukadi, K., & Maamar, Z. (2017, October). Privacy-aware in the IoT applications: a systematic literature review. In OTM Confederated International Conferences`` On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems'' (pp. 552-569). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  2. Xue, M., Papadimitriou, P., Raïssi, C., Kalnis, P., & Pung, H. K. (2011, April). Distributed privacy preserving data collection. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (pp. 93-107). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  3. Atlam, H. F., Alenezi, A., Walters, R. J., Wills, G. B., & Daniel, J. (2017, June). Developing an adaptive Risk-based access control model for the Internet of Things. In 2017 IEEE international conference on internet of things (iThings) and IEEE green computing and communications (GreenCom) and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom) and ieee smart data (SmartData) (pp. 655-661). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless personal communications, 58(1), 49-69.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad hoc networks, 10(7), 1497-1516.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of Things–New security and privacy challenges. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(1), 23-30.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  7. Jain, A., Sharma, B., & Gupta, P. (2016). Internet of things: Architecture, security goals, and challenges—A survey. International journal of innovative research in science and engineering, 2(4), 154-163.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Alfaqih, T. M., & Al-Muhtadi, J. (2016). Internet of things security based on devices architecture. International Journal of Computer Applications, 133(15), 19-23.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Atlam, H. F., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. B. (2018). Intelligence of things: opportunities & challenges. 2018 3rd Cloudification of the Internet of Things (CIoT), 1-6.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Conoscenti, M., Vetro, A., & De Martin, J. C. (2017, May). Peer to peer for privacy and decentralization in the internet of things. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C) (pp. 288-290). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Atlam, H. F., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. B. (2018). Fog computing and the internet of things: A review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2(2), 10.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  12. Biswas, K., & Muthukkumarasamy, V. (2016, December). Securing smart cities using blockchain technology. In 2016 IEEE 18th international conference on high performance computing and communications; IEEE 14th international conference on smart city; IEEE 2nd international conference on data science and systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) (pp. 1392-1393). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  13. Sethi, P., & Sarangi, S. R. (2017). Internet of things: architectures, protocols, and applications. Journal of electrical and computer engineering, 2017(1), 9324035.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar, N. M., & Mallick, P. K. (2018). The Internet of Things: Insights into the building blocks, component interactions, and architecture layers. Procedia computer science, 132, 109-117.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  15. Fabiano, N. (2017, June). Internet of Things and blockchain: Legal issues and privacy. The challenge for a privacy standard. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) (pp. 727-734). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  16. Chatterjee, J. M., Kumar, P. S., Kumar, A., & Balamurugan, B. (2020). Blockchain, Bitcoin, and the Internet of Things: Overview. Blockchain Technology and the Internet of Things, 47-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved July 10, 2025, from https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sultan, K., Ruhi, U., & Lakhani, R. (2018). Conceptualizing Blockchains: Characteristics & applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03693.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, H., Li, Z., King, B., Ben Miled, Z., Wassick, J., & Tazelaar, J. (2017). A distributed ledger for supply chain physical distribution visibility. Information, 8(4), 137.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  20. Leva, A., Strada, S., & Tanelli, M. (2019, June). Control-oriented modelling of proof-of-work blockchains. In 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC) (pp. 2873-2878). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  21. Miraz, M. H., & Ali, M. (2020). Integration of blockchain and IoT: an enhanced security perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.09121.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Atlam, H. F., & Wills, G. B. (2019). An efficient security risk estimation technique for Risk-based access control model for IoT. Internet of Things, 6, 100052.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  23. Banafa, A. (2017). Three major challenges facing iot. IEEE Internet of Things, 26-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Alkurdi, F., Elgendi, I., Munasinghe, K. S., Sharma, D., & Jamalipour, A. (2018, November). Blockchain in IoT security: A survey. In 2018 28th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  25. Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2016). Blockchain in internet of things: challenges and solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.05187.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018). IoT security: Review, Blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 395-411.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  27. Hang, L., & Kim, D. H. (2019). Design and implementation of an integrated iot Blockchain platform for sensing data integrity. Sensors, 19(10), 2228.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  28. Panarello, A., Tapas, N., Merlino, G., Longo, F., & Puliafito, A. (2018). Blockchain and iot integration: A systematic survey. Sensors, 18(8), 2575.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  29. Polyzos, G. C., & Fotiou, N. (2017, August). Blockchain-assisted information distribution for the Internet of Things. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) (pp. 75-78). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  30. Mahmood, M. S., & Al Dabagh, N. B. (2023). Blockchain technology and internet of things: review, challenge and security concern. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13(1), 718-735.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  31. Conti, M., Dehghantanha, A., Franke, K., & Watson, S. (2018). Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 544-546.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  32. Tandon, A. (2019). An empirical analysis of using blockchain technology with internet of things and its application. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng, 8(9), 1470-1475.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhu, X., & Badr, Y. (2018). Identity management systems for the internet of things: A survey towards Blockchain solutions. Sensors, 18(12), 4215.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  34. Kadam, S. B., & John, S. K. (2020). Blockchain integration with low-power internet of things devices. In Handbook of Research on Blockchain Technology (pp. 183-211). Academic Press.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  35. Novo, O. (2018). Blockchain meets IoT: An architecture for scalable access management in IoT. IEEE internet of things journal, 5(2), 1184-1195.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  36. Fernández-Caramés, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018). A review on the use of blockchain for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 6, 32979-33001.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  37. Badr, S., Gomaa, I., & Abd-Elrahman, E. (2018). Multi-tier Blockchain framework for IoT-EHRs systems. Procedia Computer Science, 141, 159-166.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  38. Patil, A. S., Tama, B. A., Park, Y., & Rhee, K. H. (2017, December). A framework for blockchain based secure smart green house farming. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications (pp. 1162-1167). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  39. Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Bold{\'y, F. X. (2019). The rise of Blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 640-652.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  40. Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., & Treiblmaier, H. (2019). Leveraging the internet of things and Blockchain technology in supply chain management. Future Internet, 11(7), 161.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Y., & Wen, J. (2017). The IoT electric business model: Using blockchain technology for the internet of things. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 10(4), 983-994.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  42. Dai, H. N., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Blockchain for Internet of Things: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8076-8094.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  43. Rahman, M. S., Chamikara, M. A. P., Khalil, I., & Bouras, A. (2022). Blockchain-of-blockchains: An interoperable blockchain platform for ensuring IoT data integrity in smart city. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30, 100408.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  44. Rani, S., Kataria, A., Sharma, V., Ghosh, S., Karar, V., Lee, K., & Choi, C. (2021). Threats and corrective measures for IoT security with observance of cybercrime: A survey. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2021(1), 5579148.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  45. Raschendorfer, A., Mörzinger, B., Steinberger, E., Pelzmann, P., Oswald, R., Stadler, M., & Bleicher, F. (2019). On IOTA as a potential enabler for an M2M economy in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 79, 379-384.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  46. Douceur, J. R. (2002, March). The sybil attack. In International workshop on peer-to-peer systems (pp. 251-260). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  47. Shabandri, B., & Maheshwari, P. (2019, March). Enhancing IoT security and privacy using distributed ledgers with IOTA and the tangle. In 2019 6th International conference on signal processing and integrated networks (SPIN) (pp. 1069-1075). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  48. Atlam, H. F., Azad, M. A., Alzahrani, A. G., & Wills, G. (2020). A Review of Blockchain in Internet of Things and AI. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(4), 28.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  49. Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum project yellow paper, 151(2014), 1-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun, H., Hua, S., Zhou, E., Pi, B., Sun, J., & Yamashita, K. (2018, June). Using ethereum blockchain in Internet of Things: A solution for electric vehicle battery refueling. In International Conference on Blockchain (pp. 3-17). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  51. Bischoff, O., & Seuring, S. (2021). Opportunities and limitations of public blockchain-based supply chain traceability. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 3(3), 226-243.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  52. Li, Z., Wang, W. M., Liu, G., Liu, L., He, J., & Huang, G. Q. (2018). Toward open manufacturing: A cross-enterprises knowledge and services exchange framework based on blockchain and edge computing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), 303-320.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  53. Pongnumkul, S., Siripanpornchana, C., & Thajchayapong, S. (2017, July). Performance analysis of private Blockchain platforms in varying workloads. In 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  54. Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2020). Towards post-quantum blockchain: A review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access, 8, 21091-21116.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  55. Popov, S. (2018). The tangle. White Paper, 1(3), 30.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper, 3(37), 2-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., ... & Yellick, J. (2018, April). Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In Proceedings of the thirteenth EuroSys conference (pp. 1-15).
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  58. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  59. Makhdoom, I., Abolhasan, M., & Ni, W. (2018, January). Blockchain for IoT: The challenges and a way forward. In ICETE 2018-Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  60. Wohrer, M., & Zdun, U. (2018, March). Smart contracts: security patterns in the ethereum ecosystem and solidity. In 2018 International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE) (pp. 2-8). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  61. Gascon-Samson, J., Rafiuzzaman, M., & Pattabiraman, K. (2017, December). Thingsjs: Towards a flexible and self-adaptable middleware for dynamic and heterogeneous iot environments. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Middleware and Applications for the Internet of Things (pp. 11-16).
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  62. Reyna, A., Martín, C., Chen, J., Soler, E., & Díaz, M. (2018). On Blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 88, 173-190.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  63. Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292-2303.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  64. Song, J., Zhang, P., Alkubati, M., Bao, Y., & Yu, G. (2022). Research advances on blockchain-as-a-service: Architectures, applications and challenges. Digital Communications and Networks, 8(4), 466-475.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  65. Samaniego, M., Jamsrandorj, U., & Deters, R. (2016, December). Blockchain as a Service for IoT. In 2016 IEEE international conference on internet of things (iThings) and IEEE green computing and communications (GreenCom) and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom) and IEEE smart data (SmartData) (pp. 433-436). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  66. Singh, S. K., Rathore, S., & Park, J. H. (2020). Blockiotintelligence: A Blockchain-enabled intelligent IoT architecture with artificial intelligence. Future Generation Computer Systems, 110, 721-743.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  67. Sandner, P., Gross, J., & Richter, R. (2020). Convergence of Blockchain, IoT, and AI. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3, 522600.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  68. Khan, M. A., Ullah, I., Alkhalifah, A., Rehman, S. U., Shah, J. A., Uddin, M. I., ... & Algarni, F. (2021). A provable and privacy-preserving authentication scheme for UAV-enabled intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(5), 3416-3425.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  69. Saeed, M. M., Saeed, R. A., Abdelhaq, M., Alsaqour, R., Hasan, M. K., & Mokhtar, R. A. (2023). Anomaly detection in 6G networks using machine learning methods. Electronics, 12(15), 3300.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Umair, M. K., Khan, M. S., & Abrar, M. F. (2026). Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Based IoT Solutions. ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems, 2(2), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.62762/TACS.2025.327681
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Umair, Muhammad Khurram
AU  - Khan, Muhammad Sohail
AU  - Abrar, Muhammad Faisal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/02/13
TI  - Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Based IoT Solutions
JO  - ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems
T2  - ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems
JF  - ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
SP  - 116
EP  - 136
DO  - 10.62762/TACS.2025.327681
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TACS.2025.327681
KW  - blockchain
KW  - IoT
KW  - literature review
KW  - secure IoT solutions
KW  - systematic review
AB  - The growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has connected a massive number of devices, but its common centralized design creates major security, privacy, and scalability problems that old security methods cannot properly fix. This review explores how Blockchain Technology (BCT) offers a new approach to create trust and strong security for IoT systems without a central authority. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study analyzes 68 research papers and uses a Chi-square test to statistically confirm the link between IoT problems and the use of blockchain solutions. The results show a strong, statistically proven connection, with a Chi-square value of 34.772 (p
SN  - 3068-7969
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Umair2026Systematic,
  author = {Muhammad Khurram Umair and Muhammad Sohail Khan and Muhammad Faisal Abrar},
  title = {Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Based IoT Solutions},
  journal = {ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {116-136},
  doi = {10.62762/TACS.2025.327681},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TACS.2025.327681},
  abstract = {The growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has connected a massive number of devices, but its common centralized design creates major security, privacy, and scalability problems that old security methods cannot properly fix. This review explores how Blockchain Technology (BCT) offers a new approach to create trust and strong security for IoT systems without a central authority. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study analyzes 68 research papers and uses a Chi-square test to statistically confirm the link between IoT problems and the use of blockchain solutions. The results show a strong, statistically proven connection, with a Chi-square value of 34.772 (p},
  keywords = {blockchain, IoT, literature review, secure IoT solutions, systematic review},
  issn = {3068-7969},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 33
PDF Downloads: 10

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems

ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems

ISSN: 3068-7969 (Online)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/