Volume 3, Issue 1, Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis
Volume 3, Issue 1, 2026
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2026: 26-36

Open Access | Research Article | 10 February 2026
Climate Change and Policy Paralysis in Pakistan
1 Shahkot Campus, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
* Corresponding Author: Muhammad Umar Farooq, [email protected]
ARK: ark:/57805/jsspa.2026.546261
Received: 15 January 2026, Accepted: 31 January 2026, Published: 10 February 2026  
Abstract
Pakistan ranks among the world's most climate-vulnerable nations, experiencing recurrent floods, extreme heatwaves, droughts, and water insecurity despite contributing less than one percent to global greenhouse gas emissions. Although numerous climate policies and strategic frameworks have been formulated, their implementation remains substantially limited, exemplifying policy paralysis wherein political acknowledgement fails to translate into effective action. This study examines climate change through a public policy and governance lens, contending that the crisis represents primarily an institutional failure rather than insufficient awareness. Key drivers of policy paralysis include weak implementation mechanisms, federal-provincial fragmentation following the 18th Constitutional Amendment, short-term political incentives, donor-driven policy formulation, and inadequate evidence-based decision-making processes. The 2022 floods particularly illustrate how deficient planning, unregulated land use, and limited disaster preparedness amplified climate risks. This analysis reframes climate change as fundamentally a governance challenge, emphasizing the necessity of mainstreaming climate considerations into development planning, budgeting frameworks, and administrative reforms. Without strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing intergovernmental coordination, and committing to long-term climate resilience strategies, Pakistan will continue confronting recurrent climate emergencies, threatening economic stability and national security.

Graphical Abstract
Climate Change and Policy Paralysis in Pakistan

Keywords
climate change
policy paralysis
governance failure
public policy in pakistan
climate
adaptation
institutional capacity
federal–provincial coordination

Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.

Funding
This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement
The author declares that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. Ostrom, E. (2017). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. In Global justice (pp. 423-430). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Government of Pakistan. (2017). Climate Change Act, 2017. Climate Change Laws of the World. Retrieved from https://climate-laws.org/document/pakistan-climate-change-act-2017_3453
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Giddens, A. (2011). The politics of climate change (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., & Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3), 335–354.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmad, M., Asad, M., & Irtaza, A. (2023). Analysis of climate change policy of Pakistan; hurdles & loopholes. Pakistan Review of Social Sciences (PRSS), 4(2), 4-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global environmental change, 18(1), 180-191.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  7. Arif, M. I. U., & Mahsud, M. I. (2024). Disentangling Pakistan's Climate Change Governance Challenges: Trajectories and Underpinnings. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 3(10), 36-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bashir, R. (2025). International Climate Agreements and Pakistan's National Climate Policies: Implementation, Gaps and Coping Strategies. Journal of Pakistan Administration, 46(1), 20-56.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Kabat, P. (2015). On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change, 13(5), 1119–1129.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136–154.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2015). Governing climate change (3rd ed.). Routledge.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubash, N. K., Khosla, R., Kelkar, U., & Lele, S. (2018). India and climate change: Evolving ideas and increasing policy engagement. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43(1), 395-424.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., Schäfer, L., & Winges, M. (2021). Global climate risk index 2020. Who suffers most from extreme weather events, 2000-2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Climate Change. (2012). Pakistan: National climate change policy (2012). National Rural Support Programme (NRSP). Retrieved from https://www.nrsp.gov.pk/Default.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2017). Implementing public policy. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 115-134). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Khan, R. U. A., Idrees, R. Q., & Shahid, A. (2024). Pakistan's Climate Change Act: Evaluating Impacts, Efficacy, and Prospects for Future Progress. International Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 332-348.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Michaelowa, K., & Michaelowa, A. (2019). Transnational climate governance initiatives: designed for effective climate change mitigation?. In The Comparative Politics of Transnational Climate Governance (pp. 146-178). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mumtaz, M. (2018). The National Climate Change Policy of Pakistan: An evaluation of its impact on institutional change. Earth Systems and Environment, 2(3), 525–535.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  21. Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Planning, Development, and Special Initiatives, Asian Development Bank, European Union, United Nations Development Programme, & World Bank. (2026, January 7). Pakistan floods 2022: Post-disaster needs assessment. UNDP Climate Promise. Retrieved from https://climatepromise.undp.org/research-and-reports/pakistan-floods-2022-post-disaster-needs-assessment
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced introduction to public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation (Vol. 708). Univ of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Heller, T. C., & Shukla, P. R. (2003). Development and climate: Engaging developing countries. Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the international effort against climate change, 111-140.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ali, M., Hannan, M., & Ahmed, W. (2025). Cascading Risks and Adaptive Deficits: A Review of Climate Change Impacts on Pakistan’s Water Security.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  27. Warraich, A. N. (2025). Rethinking the governance paradigm for dealing with climate change in Pakistan. UCP Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–19.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  28. K Robert, Y. (2018). Case study research and applications design and methods. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
    [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Farooq, M. U. (2026). Climate Change and Policy Paralysis in Pakistan. Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis, 3(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.62762/JSSPA.2026.546261
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Farooq, Muhammad Umar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/02/10
TI  - Climate Change and Policy Paralysis in Pakistan
JO  - Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis
T2  - Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis
JF  - Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis
VL  - 3
IS  - 1
SP  - 26
EP  - 36
DO  - 10.62762/JSSPA.2026.546261
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JSSPA.2026.546261
KW  - climate change
KW  - policy paralysis
KW  - governance failure
KW  - public policy in pakistan
KW  - climate
KW  - adaptation
KW  - institutional capacity
KW  - federal–provincial coordination
AB  - Pakistan ranks among the world's most climate-vulnerable nations, experiencing recurrent floods, extreme heatwaves, droughts, and water insecurity despite contributing less than one percent to global greenhouse gas emissions. Although numerous climate policies and strategic frameworks have been formulated, their implementation remains substantially limited, exemplifying policy paralysis wherein political acknowledgement fails to translate into effective action. This study examines climate change through a public policy and governance lens, contending that the crisis represents primarily an institutional failure rather than insufficient awareness. Key drivers of policy paralysis include weak implementation mechanisms, federal-provincial fragmentation following the 18th Constitutional Amendment, short-term political incentives, donor-driven policy formulation, and inadequate evidence-based decision-making processes. The 2022 floods particularly illustrate how deficient planning, unregulated land use, and limited disaster preparedness amplified climate risks. This analysis reframes climate change as fundamentally a governance challenge, emphasizing the necessity of mainstreaming climate considerations into development planning, budgeting frameworks, and administrative reforms. Without strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing intergovernmental coordination, and committing to long-term climate resilience strategies, Pakistan will continue confronting recurrent climate emergencies, threatening economic stability and national security.
SN  - 3068-5540
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Farooq2026Climate,
  author = {Muhammad Umar Farooq},
  title = {Climate Change and Policy Paralysis in Pakistan},
  journal = {Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {3},
  number = {1},
  pages = {26-36},
  doi = {10.62762/JSSPA.2026.546261},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JSSPA.2026.546261},
  abstract = {Pakistan ranks among the world's most climate-vulnerable nations, experiencing recurrent floods, extreme heatwaves, droughts, and water insecurity despite contributing less than one percent to global greenhouse gas emissions. Although numerous climate policies and strategic frameworks have been formulated, their implementation remains substantially limited, exemplifying policy paralysis wherein political acknowledgement fails to translate into effective action. This study examines climate change through a public policy and governance lens, contending that the crisis represents primarily an institutional failure rather than insufficient awareness. Key drivers of policy paralysis include weak implementation mechanisms, federal-provincial fragmentation following the 18th Constitutional Amendment, short-term political incentives, donor-driven policy formulation, and inadequate evidence-based decision-making processes. The 2022 floods particularly illustrate how deficient planning, unregulated land use, and limited disaster preparedness amplified climate risks. This analysis reframes climate change as fundamentally a governance challenge, emphasizing the necessity of mainstreaming climate considerations into development planning, budgeting frameworks, and administrative reforms. Without strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing intergovernmental coordination, and committing to long-term climate resilience strategies, Pakistan will continue confronting recurrent climate emergencies, threatening economic stability and national security.},
  keywords = {climate change, policy paralysis, governance failure, public policy in pakistan, climate, adaptation, institutional capacity, federal–provincial coordination},
  issn = {3068-5540},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 9
PDF Downloads: 0

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis

Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis

ISSN: 3068-5540 (Online)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/