Cognitive Anchors in Price Interpretation: Consumer Segmentation Evidence from Credence-Based Professional Services
Article Information
Abstract
This study moves beyond average price effects to examine systematic heterogeneity in how consumers cognitively construct meaning from ambiguous prices in credence-based professional services. We propose a dual-anchor framework---comprising the External Normative Reference Anchor (ENRA) and the Internal Value Identification Anchor (IVIA)---and validate it using survey data from 676 psychological counseling consumers. Factor and cluster analyses identify three distinct segments: Normative Anchors, Value Identifiers, and Cognitively Ambivalent consumers. These segments differ significantly in price-quality beliefs and selected perceived barriers (stigma and price sensitivity) but not in short-term choice intentions, suggesting that heterogeneity primarily shapes belief formation rather than immediate behavior. The findings advance behavioral pricing theory and provide a practical segmentation tool for tailoring pricing communications across various credence-based services. Our framework thus offers a cognitive microstructure for understanding how price signals are decoded in markets where quality is inherently unobservable, a challenge central to the governance of many professional service industries.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
AI Use Statement
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. The Journal of law and economics, 16(1), 67-88.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Enke, B., & Zimmermann, F. (2019). Correlation neglect in belief formation. The review of economic studies, 86(1), 313-332.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Zong, Y., & Guo, X. (2022). An experimental study on anchoring effect of consumers’ price judgment based on consumers’ experiencing scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 794135.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge University Press.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-10420-001
[Google Scholar] - Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, research & practice, 16(3), 252-260.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383-393.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Dulleck, U., & Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 5-42.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486-507.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR AU - Hou, Debao AU - Bayasgala, Tsetsegee AU - Dashzevegn, Amgalan AU - Shirchin, Nominerdene PY - 2026 DA - 2026/09/10 TI - Cognitive Anchors in Price Interpretation: Consumer Segmentation Evidence from Credence-Based Professional Services JO - Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis T2 - Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis JF - Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis VL - 3 IS - 3 SP - 143 EP - 154 DO - 10.62762/JSSPA.2026.729628 UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JSSPA.2026.729628 KW - price interpretation KW - cognitive anchors KW - credence-based services KW - behavioral pricing KW - market segmentation AB - This study moves beyond average price effects to examine systematic heterogeneity in how consumers cognitively construct meaning from ambiguous prices in credence-based professional services. We propose a dual-anchor framework---comprising the External Normative Reference Anchor (ENRA) and the Internal Value Identification Anchor (IVIA)---and validate it using survey data from 676 psychological counseling consumers. Factor and cluster analyses identify three distinct segments: Normative Anchors, Value Identifiers, and Cognitively Ambivalent consumers. These segments differ significantly in price-quality beliefs and selected perceived barriers (stigma and price sensitivity) but not in short-term choice intentions, suggesting that heterogeneity primarily shapes belief formation rather than immediate behavior. The findings advance behavioral pricing theory and provide a practical segmentation tool for tailoring pricing communications across various credence-based services. Our framework thus offers a cognitive microstructure for understanding how price signals are decoded in markets where quality is inherently unobservable, a challenge central to the governance of many professional service industries. SN - 3068-5540 PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge LA - English ER -
@article{Hou2026Cognitive,
author = {Debao Hou and Tsetsegee Bayasgala and Amgalan Dashzevegn and Nominerdene Shirchin},
title = {Cognitive Anchors in Price Interpretation: Consumer Segmentation Evidence from Credence-Based Professional Services},
journal = {Journal of Social Systems and Policy Analysis},
year = {2026},
volume = {3},
number = {3},
pages = {143-154},
doi = {10.62762/JSSPA.2026.729628},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/JSSPA.2026.729628},
abstract = {This study moves beyond average price effects to examine systematic heterogeneity in how consumers cognitively construct meaning from ambiguous prices in credence-based professional services. We propose a dual-anchor framework---comprising the External Normative Reference Anchor (ENRA) and the Internal Value Identification Anchor (IVIA)---and validate it using survey data from 676 psychological counseling consumers. Factor and cluster analyses identify three distinct segments: Normative Anchors, Value Identifiers, and Cognitively Ambivalent consumers. These segments differ significantly in price-quality beliefs and selected perceived barriers (stigma and price sensitivity) but not in short-term choice intentions, suggesting that heterogeneity primarily shapes belief formation rather than immediate behavior. The findings advance behavioral pricing theory and provide a practical segmentation tool for tailoring pricing communications across various credence-based services. Our framework thus offers a cognitive microstructure for understanding how price signals are decoded in markets where quality is inherently unobservable, a challenge central to the governance of many professional service industries.},
keywords = {price interpretation, cognitive anchors, credence-based services, behavioral pricing, market segmentation},
issn = {3068-5540},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Article Metrics
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Portico