-
CiteScore
-
Impact Factor
Volume 1, Issue 4, ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems
Volume 1, Issue 4, 2025
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems, Volume 1, Issue 4, 2025: 275-290

Open Access | Research Article | 07 November 2025
Innovative Machine Learning Approaches for Evaluating Climate Change Vulnerabilities of SMEs
1 Department of Statistics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
2 School of Mathematics, Statistics and Mechanics, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
3 Department of Computer Science, University of Lakki Marwat, Lakki Marwat 28420, Pakistan
* Corresponding Author: Ubaid Ullah, [email protected]
Received: 26 June 2025, Accepted: 28 August 2025, Published: 07 November 2025  
Abstract
This paper examines the vulnerability of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) exposed to evolving climate changes in Pakistan, specifically the impacts of extreme weather events, including floods and drought. The earlier literature illustrates that SMEs are affected by climate-related risks, but the current study takes the discussion further by implementing machine learning algorithms to measure the vulnerabilities of SMEs more objectively. A mixed-methods design was used to combine surveys with machine-learning techniques. PyCaret was employed to tune instruments such as Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), ordered logistic regression, LightGBM, ADA Boost, SVM, KNN, GBC, and Naïve Bayes, among others, in Python. The results show that SMEs located in rural regions are significantly more vulnerable to climate events than SMEs in urban areas. The best results were found by the Logistic Regression model: its accuracy was 63.3%, recall 63.3%, F1-score 55.2%, and Kappa value 0.23. Random Forest showed similar findings, but Logistic Regression proved stronger in diagnosing the influence of climate on business activity. Ordered logistic regression-based analyses show that awareness of temperature fluctuation (p = 0.035) and perceived financial impact (p = 0.018) significantly affect the degree to which firms are affected by climate-related impacts, while geographic locations (p = 0.057) and business tenure (p = 0.091) are only marginally important. Strict evaluation of empirical evidence has pointed out that the application of focused financial tools, extensive infrastructure, and governance framework transformation can help to make the small- and medium-sized enterprises, especially enterprises located in remote areas to be more resilient to climate-related risks.. Further studies may improve this analysis through a more detailed machine-learning framework and analysis of sector-specific effects of climate change in specific geographic areas.

Graphical Abstract
Innovative Machine Learning Approaches for Evaluating Climate Change Vulnerabilities of SMEs

Keywords
climate change
small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
machine learning
logistic regression
PyCaret
climate risk

Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.

Funding
This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. Sheikh, M. M., Manzoor, N., Adnan, M., Ashraf, J., & Khan, A. M. (2009). Climate profile and past climate changes in Pakistan. Global Change Impact Studies Center (GCISC)-RR-01, 1-189.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. McCarthy, J. J. (Ed.). (2001). Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 2). Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alam, A., Du, A. M., Rahman, M., Yazdifar, H., & Abbasi, K. (2022). SMEs respond to climate change: Evidence from developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122087.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Ullah, W., Nihei, T., Nafees, M., Zaman, R., & Ali, M. (2018). Understanding climate change vulnerability, adaptation and risk perceptions at household level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 10(3), 359-378.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., ... & Bengio, Y. (2022). Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(2), 1-96.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhao, Z., Tang, S., Huang, J., Yang, J., Ma, Z., Fang, W., ... & Bi, J. (2025). Firm-level climate risk assessment: Recent progress and future research agenda. Risk Sciences, 100012.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  7. Niculae, A. M., Oprea, S. V., Văduva, A. G., Bâra, A., & Andreescu, A. I. (2024). Assessing the Role of Machine Learning in Climate Research Publications. Sustainability, 16(24), 11086.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalvala, V., & Gupta, A. (2025, February). Integrating Machine Learning and Statistical Models in Enterprise Risk Analysis. In 2025 4th International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning (ICSADL) (pp. 852-861). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Nhemachena, C., Nhamo, L., Matchaya, G., Nhemachena, C. R., Muchara, B., Karuaihe, S. T., & Mpandeli, S. (2020). Climate change impacts on water and agriculture sectors in Southern Africa: Threats and opportunities for sustainable development. Water, 12(10), 2673.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Ukoba, K., Onisuru, O. R., Jen, T. C., Madyira, D. M., & Olatunji, K. O. (2025). Predictive modeling of climate change impacts using Artificial Intelligence: a review for equitable governance and sustainable outcome. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-20.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Geurts, P., Ernst, D., & Wehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine learning, 63(1), 3-42.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhai, T., Wang, D., Zhang, Q., Saeidi, P., & Mishra, A. R. (2023). Assessment of the agriculture supply chain risks for investments of agricultural small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using the decision support model. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 2126991-2126991.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  13. Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011-1013.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  14. Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 41(3), 1-58.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao, Z., Li, D., & Dai, W. (2023). Machine-learning-enabled intelligence computing for crisis management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122492.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  17. Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., ... & Hussain, A. (2024). Interpreting black-box models: a review on explainable artificial intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45-74.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  18. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  19. Hino, M., Benami, E., & Brooks, N. (2018). Machine learning for environmental monitoring. Nature Sustainability, 1(10), 583-588.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  20. Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R (Vol. 103). New York: springer.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  22. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., ... & Liu, T. Y. (2017). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rizkallah, L. W. (2025). Enhancing the performance of gradient boosting trees on regression problems. Journal of big data, 12(1), 35.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  24. Beja-Battais, P. (2023). Overview of AdaBoost: Reconciling its views to better understand its dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18323.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Almaspoor, M. H., Safaei, A., Salajegheh, A., & Minaei-Bidgoli, B. (2021). Support vector machines in big data classification: A systematic literature review.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  26. Halder, R. K., Uddin, M. N., Uddin, M. A., Aryal, S., & Khraisat, A. (2024). Enhancing K-nearest neighbor algorithm: a comprehensive review and performance analysis of modifications. Journal of Big Data, 11(1), 113.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  27. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., & Franklin, J. (2005). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 27(2), 83-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, S., Ren, J., Lian, X., Bai, R., & Jiang, X. (2022, August). Boosting the discriminant power of naive Bayes. In 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (pp. 4906-4912). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  29. Azeraf, E., Monfrini, E., & Pieczynski, W. (2021). Improving usual Naive Bayes classifier performances with Neural Naive Bayes based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07307.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC genomics, 21(1), 6.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  31. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825-2830.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1-35.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Ullah, U., Khalil, A., Rehman, A., Ullah, S., Hassan, S., & Sani, M. (2025). Innovative Machine Learning Approaches for Evaluating Climate Change Vulnerabilities of SMEs. ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems, 1(4), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.62762/TACS.2025.395911

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 110
PDF Downloads: 34

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems

ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems

ISSN: 3068-7969 (Online)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/