Abstract
This literature review examines the state of Text-to-SQL technology, which translates natural language queries into SQL. It analyzes rule-based, neural, and hybrid approaches, assessing their strengths and weaknesses, and surveys commonly used datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics. The study identifies research gaps concerning generalization, scalability, and interpretability, and suggests integrating user feedback and domain knowledge. To better understand the implementation and potential improvements of machine learning in this domain, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of publications from 2015 to 2023. From 439 gathered papers, 23 were identified as highly relevant. The review analyzes these works across four areas: (i) datasets employed, (ii) evolution of learning methods, (iii) development of evaluation procedures, and (iv) a meta-analysis of model performance. The findings confirm significant room for improvement in learning strategies. Persistent research gaps include cross-domain generalization, schema linking for complex databases, a lack of robust multilingual models, and the trade-off between model accuracy and interpretability. We propose future directions such as integrating contrastive schema linking, zero-shot/few-shot learning, explainability-driven design, and developing diverse, large-scale benchmarks that reflect real-world database complexity.
Keywords
Text-to-SQL
systematic literature review
natural language processing
meta analysis
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported without any funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Cite This Article
APA Style
Baig, M. S., Sher, T., Rehman, A., & Sheikh, S. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review of Text-to-SQL: Performance, Challenges, and Limitations. ICCK Transactions on Advanced Computing and Systems, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.62762/TACS.2025.497935
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.