Volume 2, Issue 4, Agricultural Science and Food Processing
Volume 2, Issue 4, 2025
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Agricultural Science and Food Processing, Volume 2, Issue 4, 2025: 176-196

Open Access | Research Article | 30 December 2025
Development and Sustainability Assessment of a Fish-drying Kiln: Eco-thermodynamic Insights
1 Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, School of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria
2 Department of Natural Sciences, Texas A&M University–San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78224, United States
* Corresponding Author: Nnaemeka R. Nwakuba, [email protected]
ARK: ark:/57805/asfp.2025.325927
Received: 04 October 2025, Accepted: 18 December 2025, Published: 30 December 2025  
Abstract
The demand for sustainable and viable drying technologies has risen continuously in response to the growing energy costs and emerging environmental decline. The study designed and evaluated the operational efficiency of a counter-flow heat recovery fish drying kiln at a uniform temperature (55 $^\circ$C), varying air velocities (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0m/s), and batch sizes (15, 20, and 25kg) of catfish using an eco-thermodynamic approach embodying energy, exergy, environmental, and economic assessments. The findings indicate that heat transfer was greatly improved with higher air speeds and batch sizes, which also reduced charcoal consumption from 22.18kg to 18.85kg and shortened the drying duration from 330 to 180 minutes. The drying rate varied between 0.041 $\leq \mathcal{X}_d \leq$ 0.083kg/min, with a rehydration ratio of 1.71 $\leq \zeta_R \leq$ 1.74 and shrinkage of 20 $\leq \phi_s \leq$ 30.54$%$ ($\pm$ 2.25$%$). Specific energy utilization dropped from 42.88 $\times$ 10$^3$ to 21.87$\times$10$^3$ kJ/kg, and exergy efficiency increased from 42.88 $\leq \eta_{ex} \leq$ 49.75$%$ ($\pm$ 0.48$%$). The sustainability index and improvement potential were obtained as 1.68 and 457.48MJ, respectively. Environmental assessment enhanced as carbon credits rose to ₦532.33 and CO$_2$ emissions dropped from 62.77 kg to 53.35 kg/cycle. The kiln exhibited unique economic feasibility, as evidenced by the reduction in drying costs from ₦26.13 to ₦15.68/kg, and an increase in yearly savings from ₦3.88 million to ₦6.86 million. The benefit-cost ratio rose from 1.98 to 3.59, and the payback time was shortened to 0.27 years. These findings support the kiln’s potential as an inexpensive, ecologically friendly, and thermally productive solution for drying fish products. Future research directions were proposed.

Graphical Abstract
Development and Sustainability Assessment of a Fish-drying Kiln: Eco-thermodynamic Insights

Keywords
catfish
specific energy utilization
exergy efficiency
sustainability metrics
charcoal-powered dryer
psychrometry

Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.

Funding
This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. Fasludeen, N. S., Murali, S., Samuel, M. P., Ninan, G., & Joshy, C. G. (2018). Evaluation of drying characteristics of selected fishes in dryers developed by ICAR-CIFT.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Erdem, M., Kamışlı, F., Varol, Y., & Öztop, H. (2021). Energy and Exergy Analysis of Drying Behavior for a Fish. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 16(1), 85-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amponsah, S. K., Asare, H., Okyere, H., Owusu-Asante, J. O., Minkah, E., & Ketemepi, H. K. (2022). Performance characterization of a locally developed fish smoke-drying kiln for charcoal and briquette. Journal of Agricultural Science, 14(11), 43-53.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Ezurike, B. O., Abid, M., Ajah, S. A., Okoronkwo, C. A., Adun, H., Nwawelu, U. N., ... & Zaini, J. H. (2023). Design and Numerical Energetic Analysis of a Novel Semi-Automated Biomass-Powered Multipurpose Dryer. Sustainability, 15(8), 6639.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Asamoah, E. K., Nunoo, F. K. E., Addo, S., Nyarko, J. O., Adjei, M. Y. B., Kunadu, A. P. H., & Hyldig, G. (2025). Comparison of the efficiency of improved and traditional fish smoking kilns and their effects on smoked fish quality in Ghana. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 105(5), 2923-2930.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Alfiya, P. V., Murali, S., Aniesrani Delfiya, D. S., & Samuel, M. P. (2025). Design and development of biomass-fueled convective dryer for marine products: energy, exergy, environmental, and economic (4E) analysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15(8), 12031-12042.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  7. Murali, S., Aniesrani Delfiya, D. S., Sajesh, V. K., Neethu, K. C., Sathish Kumar, K., & Ninan, G. (2025). Experimental evaluation of biomass gasifier integrated solar hybrid dryer using shrimps: gasifier performance, modeling of drying behavior, and quality analysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15(2), 3057-3069.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  8. Rizal, T. A., & Muhammad, Z. (2018). Fabrication and testing of hybrid solar-biomass dryer for drying fish. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 12, 489-496.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Yuwana, Y., & Sidebang, B. (2016). Performance testing of the hybrid solar-biomass dryer for fish drying. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 6(11), 63-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chavan, B. R., Yakupitiyage, A., & Kumar, S. (2008). Mathematical modeling of drying characteristics of Indian mackerel (Rastrilliger kangurta) in solar-biomass hybrid cabinet dryer. Drying Technology, 26(12), 1552-1562.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Agroindustriais, P. (2013). AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Caracterização, Propagação E Melhoramento Genético De Pitaya Comercial E Nativa Do Cerrado, 26(74), 62.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Khoshmanesh, S. (2006, August). Design of solar dehydrator, coupled with energy storage in rock bed reservoir for fish drying process. In International Conference on Energy and Environment (ICEE), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia (Vol. 28, pp. 1-8).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Axtell, B. (2002). Drying food for profit: a guide for small businesses. ITDG Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Doymaz, İ., & İsmail, O. (2011). Drying characteristics of sweet cherry. Food and bioproducts processing, 89(1), 31-38.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  15. Zalazar-Garcia, D., Román, M. C., Fernandez, A., Asensio, D., Zhang, X., Fabani, M. P., ... & Mazza, G. (2022). Exergy, energy, and sustainability assessments applied to RSM optimization of integrated convective air-drying with pretreatments to improve the nutritional quality of pumpkin seeds. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 49, 101763.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  16. Komolafe, C. A., Waheed, M. A., Kuye, S. I., Adewumi, B. A., & Adejumo, A. O. D. (2021). Thermodynamic analysis of forced convective solar drying of cocoa with black coated sensible thermal storage material. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 26, 101140.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  17. Mugi, V. R., & Chandramohan, V. P. (2021). Energy, exergy and economic analysis of an indirect type solar dryer using green chilli: A comparative assessment of forced and natural convection. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 24, 100950.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  18. Peng, J., Lu, L., & Yang, H. (2013). Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 19, 255-274.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  19. EL-Mesery, H. S., & El-Khawaga, S. E. (2022). Drying process on biomass: Evaluation of the drying performance and energy analysis of different dryers. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 33, 101953.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehmad, M., Hidra, N., Lhomme, P., Mghazli, S., Hachimi, Y. E., & Abdenouri, N. (2024). Environmental, economic and quality assessment of hybrid solar-electric drying of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae. Renewable Energy, 226, 120401.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  21. Nwakuba, N. R., Ndukwu, M. C., Asonye, G. U., Asoegwu, S. N., & Nwandikom, G. I. (2020). Environmental sustainability analysis of a hybrid heat source dryer. Polytechnica, 3(1), 99-114.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar, Y., Arora, V. K., & Kundli, D. S. (2019). Energy and exergy analysis and its application of different drying techniques: a review. ISME Journal of Thermofluid, 5(2), 10-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hadibi, T., Mennouche, D., Boubekri, A., Chouicha, S., Arıcı, M., Yunfeng, W., ... & Fang-ling, F. (2023). Drying characteristic, sustainability, and 4E (energy, exergy, and enviro-economic) analysis of dried date fruits using indirect solar-electric dryer: an experimental investigation. Renewable Energy, 218, 119291.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakshmi, D. V. N., Muthukumar, P., & Nayak, P. K. (2021). Experimental investigations on active solar dryers integrated with thermal storage for drying of black pepper. Renewable Energy, 167, 728-739.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  25. Mujumdar, A. S. (2006). Handbook of industrial drying. CRC press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dhanushkodi, S., Wilson, V. H., & Sudhakar, K. (2015). Design and performance evaluation of biomass dryer for cashewnut processing. Advances in Applied Science Research, 6(8), 101-111.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Darvishi, H., Asl, A. R., Asghari, A., & Gazori, G. N. H. A. (2013). Mathematical modeling, moisture diffusion, energy consumption and efficiency of thin layer drying of potato slices.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Aremu, M. O., Namo, S. B., Salau, R. B., Agbo, C. O., & Ibrahim, H. (2013). Smoking methods and their effects on nutritional value of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). The Open Nutraceuticals Journal, 6(1), 105-112.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  29. Ruan, J., Xue, G., Liu, Y., Ye, B., Li, M., & Xu, Q. (2025). Optimization of the vacuum microwave drying of tilapia fillets using response surface analysis. Foods, 14(5), 873.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  30. Ershov, M. A., Ershov, A. M., Selyakov, I. Y., & Ereshchenko, V. V. (2020, July). Optimization of mass-transfer processes of fish convective dehydration. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 539, No. 1, p. 012190). IOP Publishing.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  31. Fitri, N., Chan, S. X. Y., Che Lah, N. H., Jam, F. A., Misnan, N. M., Kamal, N., ... & Abas, F. (2022). A comprehensive review on the processing of dried fish and the associated chemical and nutritional changes. Foods, 11(19), 2938.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  32. Aniesrani Delfiya, D. S., Sneha, R., Prashob, K., Murali, S., Alfiya, P. V., & Samuel, M. P. (2022). Hot air‐assisted continuous infrared dryer for anchovy fish drying. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 45(6), e13824.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  33. Wincy, W. B., & Edwin, M. Energy, Economic and Environmental Analysis of a Novel Syngas Operated Dryer for Fish Drying.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Valencia-Ochoa, G., Duarte-Forero, J., & Mendoza-Casseres, D. (2025). Multi-Objective Optimization of the Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Performance of a Hybrid Solar–Biomass Combined Brayton/Organic Rankine Cycle. Energies, 18(1), 203.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  35. Ndukwu, M. C., Ibeh, M. I., Etim, P., Augustine, C. U., Ekop, I. E., Leonard, A., ... & Bennamoun, L. (2022). Assessment of eco‐thermal sustainability potential of a cluster of low‐cost solar dryer designs based on exergetic sustainability indicators and earned carbon credit. Cleaner Energy Systems, 3, 100027.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  36. Sturm, B., Raut, S., Chikpah, S. K., Ndisya, J., Hensel, O., Esper, A., & Korese, J. K. (2023). Increase of nutritional security in Sub-Saharan Africa through the production of dried products from underutilized crops. Drying Technology, 41(2), 322-334. \href{
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  37. Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2012). Exergy: energy, environment and sustainable development. Newnes.
    [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Nwakuba, N. R., Ofojioha, O. M., Ikechukwu, K. U., Ofoma, A. N., Chikwue, M. I., Oham, P. N., & Okorie, C. E. (2025). Development and Sustainability Assessment of a Fish-drying Kiln: Eco-thermodynamic Insights. Agricultural Science and Food Processing, 2(4), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.62762/ASFP.2025.325927
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nwakuba, Nnaemeka R.
AU  - Ofojioha, Onyekachi M.
AU  - Ikechukwu, Kingsley U.
AU  - Ofoma, Angela N.
AU  - Chikwue, Maxwell I.
AU  - Oham, Preciouspaul N.
AU  - Okorie, Chukwuebuka E.
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/12/30
TI  - Development and Sustainability Assessment of a Fish-drying Kiln: Eco-thermodynamic Insights
JO  - Agricultural Science and Food Processing
T2  - Agricultural Science and Food Processing
JF  - Agricultural Science and Food Processing
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
SP  - 176
EP  - 196
DO  - 10.62762/ASFP.2025.325927
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/ASFP.2025.325927
KW  - catfish
KW  - specific energy utilization
KW  - exergy efficiency
KW  - sustainability metrics
KW  - charcoal-powered dryer
KW  - psychrometry
AB  - The demand for sustainable and viable drying technologies has risen continuously in response to the growing energy costs and emerging environmental decline. The study designed and evaluated the operational efficiency of a counter-flow heat recovery fish drying kiln at a uniform temperature (55 $^\circ$C), varying air velocities (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0m/s), and batch sizes (15, 20, and 25kg) of catfish using an eco-thermodynamic approach embodying energy, exergy, environmental, and economic assessments. The findings indicate that heat transfer was greatly improved with higher air speeds and batch sizes, which also reduced charcoal consumption from 22.18kg to 18.85kg and shortened the drying duration from 330 to 180 minutes. The drying rate varied between 0.041 $\leq \mathcal{X}_d \leq$ 0.083kg/min, with a rehydration ratio of 1.71 $\leq \zeta_R \leq$ 1.74 and shrinkage of 20 $\leq \phi_s \leq$ 30.54$%$ ($\pm$ 2.25$%$). Specific energy utilization dropped from 42.88 $\times$ 10$^3$ to 21.87$\times$10$^3$ kJ/kg, and exergy efficiency increased from 42.88 $\leq \eta_{ex} \leq$ 49.75$%$ ($\pm$ 0.48$%$). The sustainability index and improvement potential were obtained as 1.68 and 457.48MJ, respectively. Environmental assessment enhanced as carbon credits rose to ₦532.33 and CO$_2$ emissions dropped from 62.77 kg to 53.35 kg/cycle. The kiln exhibited unique economic feasibility, as evidenced by the reduction in drying costs from ₦26.13 to ₦15.68/kg, and an increase in yearly savings from ₦3.88 million to ₦6.86 million. The benefit-cost ratio rose from 1.98 to 3.59, and the payback time was shortened to 0.27 years. These findings support the kiln’s potential as an inexpensive, ecologically friendly, and thermally productive solution for drying fish products. Future research directions were proposed.
SN  - 3066-1579
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Nwakuba2025Developmen,
  author = {Nnaemeka R. Nwakuba and Onyekachi M. Ofojioha and Kingsley U. Ikechukwu and Angela N. Ofoma and Maxwell I. Chikwue and Preciouspaul N. Oham and Chukwuebuka E. Okorie},
  title = {Development and Sustainability Assessment of a Fish-drying Kiln: Eco-thermodynamic Insights},
  journal = {Agricultural Science and Food Processing},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {176-196},
  doi = {10.62762/ASFP.2025.325927},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/ASFP.2025.325927},
  abstract = {The demand for sustainable and viable drying technologies has risen continuously in response to the growing energy costs and emerging environmental decline. The study designed and evaluated the operational efficiency of a counter-flow heat recovery fish drying kiln at a uniform temperature (55 \$^\circ\$C), varying air velocities (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0m/s), and batch sizes (15, 20, and 25kg) of catfish using an eco-thermodynamic approach embodying energy, exergy, environmental, and economic assessments. The findings indicate that heat transfer was greatly improved with higher air speeds and batch sizes, which also reduced charcoal consumption from 22.18kg to 18.85kg and shortened the drying duration from 330 to 180 minutes. The drying rate varied between 0.041 \$\leq \mathcal{X}\_d \leq\$ 0.083kg/min, with a rehydration ratio of 1.71 \$\leq \zeta\_R \leq\$ 1.74 and shrinkage of 20 \$\leq \phi\_s \leq\$ 30.54\$\%\$ (\$\pm\$ 2.25\$\%\$). Specific energy utilization dropped from 42.88 \$\times\$ 10\$^3\$ to 21.87\$\times\$10\$^3\$ kJ/kg, and exergy efficiency increased from 42.88 \$\leq \eta\_{ex} \leq\$ 49.75\$\%\$ (\$\pm\$ 0.48\$\%\$). The sustainability index and improvement potential were obtained as 1.68 and 457.48MJ, respectively. Environmental assessment enhanced as carbon credits rose to ₦532.33 and CO\$\_2\$ emissions dropped from 62.77 kg to 53.35 kg/cycle. The kiln exhibited unique economic feasibility, as evidenced by the reduction in drying costs from ₦26.13 to ₦15.68/kg, and an increase in yearly savings from ₦3.88 million to ₦6.86 million. The benefit-cost ratio rose from 1.98 to 3.59, and the payback time was shortened to 0.27 years. These findings support the kiln’s potential as an inexpensive, ecologically friendly, and thermally productive solution for drying fish products. Future research directions were proposed.},
  keywords = {catfish, specific energy utilization, exergy efficiency, sustainability metrics, charcoal-powered dryer, psychrometry},
  issn = {3066-1579},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 214
PDF Downloads: 68

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Agricultural Science and Food Processing

Agricultural Science and Food Processing

ISSN: 3066-1579 (Online) | ISSN: 3066-1560 (Print)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/