Agricultural Science and Food Processing Home About Editors Current Issue
-
CiteScore
-
Impact Factor
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Agricultural Science and Food Processing
  4. Volume 2, Issue 2
Beyond the Breadbasket Paradox : Rethinking Agricultural Adaptation in the Age of Climate Coloniality
Commentary | Published: 30 June 2025
Agricultural Science and Food Processing Volume 2, Issue 2, 2025: 116-122
Volume 2, Issue 2, Agricultural Science and Food Processing
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2025
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Case Studies on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Finance to Transform Decision Making and Risk Management for Enhanced Financial Outcomes Research on A Ship Trajectory Classification Method Based on Deep Learning Bridging Modalities: A Survey of Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval Enhancing Fake News Detection with a Hybrid NLP-Machine Learning Framework A Mimic Fusion Algorithm for Dual Channel Video Based on Possibility Distribution Synthesis Theory YOLOv7-Bw: A Dense Small Object Efficient Detector Based on Remote Sensing Image Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data Visual Feature Extraction and Tracking Method Based on Corner Flow Detection Inaugural Editorial of the Chinese Journal of Information Fusion Analyzing the Translation and Impact of Popular Science Literature in China: A Case Study Approach
Agricultural Science and Food Processing, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2025: 116-122

Open Access | Commentary | 30 June 2025
Beyond the Breadbasket Paradox : Rethinking Agricultural Adaptation in the Age of Climate Coloniality
by
Chunming Xu Chunming Xu 1 *
1 Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
* Corresponding Author: Chunming Xu, [email protected]
DOI: 10.62762/ASFP.2025.456605
Received: 29 June 2025, Accepted: 30 June 2025, Published: 30 June 2025  
   PDF  (536.41 KB)
Article Metrics Cite This Article
Abstract
The commentary critiques Hultgren et al.'s "breadbasket paradox," asserting that limited adaptation in wealthy agricultural regions stems from systemic issues linked to climate coloniality, advocating for a decolonial, justice-focused approach to reframe agricultural adaptation under climate change.
Keywords
breadbasket paradox
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported without any funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
References
  1. Abram, N. J., Henley, B. J., Sen Gupta, A., Lippmann, T. J., Clarke, H., Dowdy, A. J., ... & Boer, M. M. (2021). Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia. Communications Earth & Environment, 2(1), 8.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal, A. (2010). Local institutions and adaptation to climate change. Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, 2, 173-178.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for sustainable development, 35(3), 869-890.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Beillouin, D., Ben‐Ari, T., Malézieux, E., Seufert, V., & Makowski, D. (2021). Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Global change biology, 27(19), 4697-4710.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Bebber, D. P., Ramotowski, M. A., & Gurr, S. J. (2013). Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nature climate change, 3(11), 985-988.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Borras Jr, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2012). Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of agrarian change, 12(1), 34-59.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  7. Barbosa, I. P. (2020). Speculative Harvests: financialization, food and agriculture. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eriksen, S., Schipper, E. L. F., Scoville-Simonds, M., Vincent, K., Adam, H. N., Brooks, N., ... & West, J. J. (2021). Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance?. World development, 141, 105383.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Gleeson, T., Cuthbert, M., Ferguson, G., & Perrone, D. (2020). Global groundwater sustainability, resources, and systems in the Anthropocene. Annual review of earth and planetary sciences, 48(2020), 431-463.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Hallegatte, S., Fay, M., & Barbier, E. B. (2018). Poverty and climate change: Introduction. Environment and development economics, 23(3), 217-233.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Nicolétis, É., Caron, P., El Solh, M., Cole, M., Fresco, L. O., Godoy-Faúndez, A., ... & Zurayk, R. (2019). Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hultgren, A., Carleton, T., Delgado, M., Gergel, D. R., Greenstone, M., Houser, T., ... & Yuan, J. (2025). Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting for adaptation. Nature, 642(8068), 644-652.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  13. Van de Wouw, M., Kik, C., van Hintum, T., van Treuren, R., & Visser, B. (2010). Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges. Plant genetic resources, 8(1), 1-15.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  14. Adil, L., Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., & Schäfer, L. (2025). Climate risk index 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith, P. (2004). Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context. European journal of agronomy, 20(3), 229-236.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  16. Myers, S. S., Zanobetti, A., Kloog, I., Huybers, P., Leakey, A. D., Bloom, A. J., ... & Usui, Y. (2014). Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature, 510(7503), 139-142.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  17. Peschard, K., & Randeria, S. (2020). ‘Keeping seeds in our hands’: the rise of seed activism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4), 613-647.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  18. Rader, R., Bartomeus, I., Tylianakis, J. M., & Laliberté, E. (2014). The winners and losers of land use intensification: Pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity. Diversity and Distributions, 20(8), 908-917.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  19. Raworth, K. (2018). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ribot, J. (2017). Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. In New Directions in Agrarian Political Economy (pp. 27-66). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Scheelbeek, P. F., Bird, F. A., Tuomisto, H. L., Green, R., Harris, F. B., Joy, E. J., ... & Dangour, A. D. (2018). Effect of environmental changes on vegetable and legume yields and nutritional quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(26), 6804-6809.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  22. Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., ... & Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 65-75.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  23. Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom (1999). The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change, 525.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shue, H. (2017). Climate dreaming: negative emissions, risk transfer, and irreversibility. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 8(2), 203-216.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  25. Stanton, E. A. (2011). Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality. Climatic Change, 107(3), 417-432.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
Cite This Article
APA Style
Xu, C. (2025). Beyond the Breadbasket Paradox : Rethinking Agricultural Adaptation in the Age of Climate Coloniality. Agricultural Science and Food Processing, 2(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.62762/ASFP.2025.456605
Article Metrics
Citations:

Google Scholar
0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 112
PDF Downloads: 64
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Agricultural Science and Food Processing

Agricultural Science and Food Processing

ISSN: 3066-1579 (Online) | ISSN: 3066-1560 (Print)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/