-
CiteScore
-
Impact Factor
Volume 1, Issue 3, Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research
Volume 1, Issue 3, 2025
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2025: 92-99

Open Access | Research Article | 26 December 2025
English Major Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Different Writing Feedback Styles and Their Relationship with Academic Writing Self-Efficacy
1 School of Foreign Studies, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
* Corresponding Author: Shengjiao Tian, [email protected]
Received: 11 September 2025, Accepted: 18 September 2025, Published: 26 December 2025  
Abstract
With the application of AI in both learning and teaching, this study investigates English major graduate students’ perceptions of corrective and suggestive feedback provided by AI, and the relationship between their perceptions and academic writing self-efficacy. Through a questionnaire survey of 37 graduate students, descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis revealed that students held positive attitudes toward both types of feedback, believing they helped improve grammatical accuracy, enhance confidence in expressing complex ideas, and stimulate writing creativity; there is a strong positive correlation between the perceptions of the two types of feedback, and self-efficacy in both feedback contexts also shows a strong positive correlation. However, there is no significant association between students’ perceptions of feedback and their academic writing self-efficacy. The ramification of study suggests that AI writing feedback has practical value but its role in enhancing writing self-efficacy is still limited.

Keywords
AI writing feedback
corrective feedback
suggestive feedback
academic writing self-efficacy
EFL graduate students

Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.

Funding
This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
This work did not require ethical approval as it involved a voluntary anonymous survey with no identifiable data collected.

References
  1. Feng, H., Li, K., & Zhang, L. J. (2025). What does AI bring to second language writing? A systematic review (2014–2024). Language Learning & Technology, 29(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AlGhamdi, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT-generated feedback on technical writing skills of computing students: A blinded study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18901-18926.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahari, A., & Gholami, L. (2023). Challenges and affordances of reading and writing development in technology-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7226–7250.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181-201.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, Y. (2021). Chinese EFL Learners' Common Grammatical Errors and Effective Teaching Methods. Greensboro College.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, G. (2024). Investigating student perspectives in the utilization of AI-driven writing feedback tools. Language Science, 31(2), 67-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2024.31.2.067
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(3), 313-331.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, S., Li, Q., Yao, Y., Li, J., & Zhu, X. (2025). Improving writing feedback quality and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers in Gen-AI contexts: An experimental mixed-method design. Assessing Writing, 66, 100960.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  12. Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Tian, S. (2025). English Major Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Different Writing Feedback Styles and Their Relationship with Academic Writing Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research, 1(3), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.62762/FEIR.2025.331227
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tian, Shengjiao
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/12/26
TI  - English Major Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Different Writing Feedback Styles and Their Relationship with Academic Writing Self-Efficacy
JO  - Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research
T2  - Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research
JF  - Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research
VL  - 1
IS  - 3
SP  - 92
EP  - 99
DO  - 10.62762/FEIR.2025.331227
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/FEIR.2025.331227
KW  - AI writing feedback
KW  - corrective feedback
KW  - suggestive feedback
KW  - academic writing self-efficacy
KW  - EFL graduate students
AB  - With the application of AI in both learning and teaching, this study investigates English major graduate students’ perceptions of corrective and suggestive feedback provided by AI, and the relationship between their perceptions and academic writing self-efficacy. Through a questionnaire survey of 37 graduate students, descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis revealed that students held positive attitudes toward both types of feedback, believing they helped improve grammatical accuracy, enhance confidence in expressing complex ideas, and stimulate writing creativity; there is a strong positive correlation between the perceptions of the two types of feedback, and self-efficacy in both feedback contexts also shows a strong positive correlation. However, there is no significant association between students’ perceptions of feedback and their academic writing self-efficacy. The ramification of study suggests that AI writing feedback has practical value but its role in enhancing writing self-efficacy is still limited.
SN  - 3068-5664
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Tian2025English,
  author = {Shengjiao Tian},
  title = {English Major Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Different Writing Feedback Styles and Their Relationship with Academic Writing Self-Efficacy},
  journal = {Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {1},
  number = {3},
  pages = {92-99},
  doi = {10.62762/FEIR.2025.331227},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/FEIR.2025.331227},
  abstract = {With the application of AI in both learning and teaching, this study investigates English major graduate students’ perceptions of corrective and suggestive feedback provided by AI, and the relationship between their perceptions and academic writing self-efficacy. Through a questionnaire survey of 37 graduate students, descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis revealed that students held positive attitudes toward both types of feedback, believing they helped improve grammatical accuracy, enhance confidence in expressing complex ideas, and stimulate writing creativity; there is a strong positive correlation between the perceptions of the two types of feedback, and self-efficacy in both feedback contexts also shows a strong positive correlation. However, there is no significant association between students’ perceptions of feedback and their academic writing self-efficacy. The ramification of study suggests that AI writing feedback has practical value but its role in enhancing writing self-efficacy is still limited.},
  keywords = {AI writing feedback, corrective feedback, suggestive feedback, academic writing self-efficacy, EFL graduate students},
  issn = {3068-5664},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 31
PDF Downloads: 11

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research

Frontiers in Educational Innovation and Research

ISSN: 3068-5664 (Online)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/