Experimental Comparative Analysis of Electromechanical, Static and Microprocessor Relay Protection Technologies
Article Information
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental comparative analysis of electromechanical, static, and microprocessor-based protective relays using the secondary injection testing method. The study evaluates key performance indicators, including pickup current, dropout current, and operating time, under controlled laboratory conditions. The results show that electromechanical relays exhibit pickup current deviations below 5\%, accompanied by relatively high variability in operating time (up to 0.2 s), mainly due to inherent mechanical limitations. Static relays demonstrate improved performance, with enhanced stability, reduced deviations, and limited time variation within ±0.1 s. Microprocessor-based relays achieve the highest level of performance, characterized by minimal deviations, negligible hysteresis, and fast response times of approximately 30 ms. The findings confirm that the technological evolution of protective relays leads to significant improvements in accuracy, response speed, and operational stability. Nevertheless, electromechanical and static relays can still ensure reliable operation when properly maintained and correctly applied. The presented results provide a realistic assessment of relay performance across different technological generations and offer a useful basis for decision-making in the modernization and upgrade of protection systems.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
AI Use Statement
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Zhou, H., Yu, H., Zou, Z., Su, Z., Xu, Z., Yang, W., & He, C. (2025). Relay protection device reliability assessment through radiation, fault injection and fault tree analysis. Micromachines, 16(1), 69.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2025). PC37.113/D5.1, May 2025 - IEEE approved draft guide for protective relay applications to transmission lines. IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11130712
[Google Scholar] - Banerjee, G., Hachmann, C., Lipphardt, J., Wiese, N., & Braun, M. (2024). Adaptive hybrid overcurrent protection scheme with high shares of distributed energy resources. Energies, 17, 6422.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Barranco-Carlos, A., Orozco-Henao, C., Marín-Quintero, J., Mora-Flórez, J., & Herrera-Orozco, A. (2023). Adaptive protection for active distribution networks: An approach based on fuses and relays with multiple setting groups. IEEE Access, 11, 31075–31091.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wannous, K., & Toman, P. (2018). Evaluation of harmonics impact on digital relays. Energies, 11(4), 893.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2015). IEEE Std C37.113-2015 - IEEE Guide for Protective Relay Applications to Transmission Lines. IEEE.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Radosavljević, J., & Jevtić, M. (2016). Hybrid GSA-SQP algorithm for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 10(8), 1928–1937.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Korashy, A., Kamel, S., Jurado, F., & Youssef, A.-R. (2019). Hybrid whale optimization algorithm and grey wolf optimizer algorithm for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays. Electric Power Components and Systems, 47(7–8), 644–658.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Ren, J., & Kezunovic, M. (2010, September). Modeling and simulation tools for teaching protective relaying design and application for the smart grid. In 2010 Modern Electric Power Systems (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Google Scholar] - Štefko, R., Šárpataky, M., Šárpataky, Ľ., Kohan, V., Havran, P., & Kolcun, M. (2022). Modeling of protection relays and renewable energy sources for microgrid systems. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 22(3), 9-17.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Godwal, S. D., Pandya, K. S., Vora, S. C., Mehta, C. R., & Rajput, V. R. (2023). Optimal overcurrent relay coordination for interconnected power systems: A proper approach and improved technique. e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 5, 100248.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Acharya, D., & Das, D. K. (2022). An efficient optimizer for optimal overcurrent relay coordination in power distribution system. Expert Systems with Applications, 199, 116858.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Kulikov, A., Loskutov, A., & Bezdushniy, D. (2022). Relay protection and automation algorithms of electrical networks based on simulation and machine learning methods. Energies, 15(18), 6525.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Perović, B., Milovanović, M., Vukašinović, J., Jovanović, A., Gajić, M., & Vulović, M. (2024). A simple procedure for evaluating the economic justification of replacing electromechanical relay protection in power plants with microprocessor protection. 23rd International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA, 20–22 March 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Milosavljević, S., & Milosavljević, R. (1999). Secondary relay testing device – SIR 3. Zbornik radova Elektrotehničkog instituta ``Nikola Tesla'' (in Serbian), 14, 117-122.
[Google Scholar]
[Google Scholar]- uazheng Electric Manufacturing (Baoding) Co., Ltd., Baoding, China. Retrieved from https://www.huazhengelectric.com
[Google Scholar] - Siemens AG. (2016). SIPROTEC 4 7SJ62/7SJ63/7SJ64 multifunctional protective relay with local control: Manual. Retrieved from https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/document/109743375/
[Google Scholar]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR AU - Milovanović, Miloš J. AU - Radosavljević, Jordan N. AU - Perović, Bojan D. PY - 2026 DA - 2026/06/03 TI - Experimental Comparative Analysis of Electromechanical, Static and Microprocessor Relay Protection Technologies JO - ICCK Transactions on Electric Power Networks and Systems T2 - ICCK Transactions on Electric Power Networks and Systems JF - ICCK Transactions on Electric Power Networks and Systems VL - 2 IS - 2 SP - 79 EP - 88 DO - 10.62762/TEPNS.2026.788018 UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TEPNS.2026.788018 KW - electromechanical KW - static and microprocessor relays KW - experimental analysis KW - relay protection KW - secondary injection testing AB - This paper presents an experimental comparative analysis of electromechanical, static, and microprocessor-based protective relays using the secondary injection testing method. The study evaluates key performance indicators, including pickup current, dropout current, and operating time, under controlled laboratory conditions. The results show that electromechanical relays exhibit pickup current deviations below 5\%, accompanied by relatively high variability in operating time (up to 0.2 s), mainly due to inherent mechanical limitations. Static relays demonstrate improved performance, with enhanced stability, reduced deviations, and limited time variation within ±0.1 s. Microprocessor-based relays achieve the highest level of performance, characterized by minimal deviations, negligible hysteresis, and fast response times of approximately 30 ms. The findings confirm that the technological evolution of protective relays leads to significant improvements in accuracy, response speed, and operational stability. Nevertheless, electromechanical and static relays can still ensure reliable operation when properly maintained and correctly applied. The presented results provide a realistic assessment of relay performance across different technological generations and offer a useful basis for decision-making in the modernization and upgrade of protection systems. SN - 3070-2607 PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge LA - English ER -
@article{Milovanovi2026Experiment,
author = {Miloš J. Milovanović and Jordan N. Radosavljević and Bojan D. Perović},
title = {Experimental Comparative Analysis of Electromechanical, Static and Microprocessor Relay Protection Technologies},
journal = {ICCK Transactions on Electric Power Networks and Systems},
year = {2026},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {79-88},
doi = {10.62762/TEPNS.2026.788018},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TEPNS.2026.788018},
abstract = {This paper presents an experimental comparative analysis of electromechanical, static, and microprocessor-based protective relays using the secondary injection testing method. The study evaluates key performance indicators, including pickup current, dropout current, and operating time, under controlled laboratory conditions. The results show that electromechanical relays exhibit pickup current deviations below 5\\%, accompanied by relatively high variability in operating time (up to 0.2 s), mainly due to inherent mechanical limitations. Static relays demonstrate improved performance, with enhanced stability, reduced deviations, and limited time variation within ±0.1 s. Microprocessor-based relays achieve the highest level of performance, characterized by minimal deviations, negligible hysteresis, and fast response times of approximately 30 ms. The findings confirm that the technological evolution of protective relays leads to significant improvements in accuracy, response speed, and operational stability. Nevertheless, electromechanical and static relays can still ensure reliable operation when properly maintained and correctly applied. The presented results provide a realistic assessment of relay performance across different technological generations and offer a useful basis for decision-making in the modernization and upgrade of protection systems.},
keywords = {electromechanical, static and microprocessor relays, experimental analysis, relay protection, secondary injection testing},
issn = {3070-2607},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Article Metrics
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Portico