Discriminating Planted Capsicum Spp. Varieties via Machine Learning and Multivariate Data Reduction
Research Article  ·  Published: 15 November 2025
Issue cover
ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
Volume 1, Issue 3, 2025: 166-185
Research Article Feature Paper Free to Read

Discriminating Planted Capsicum Spp. Varieties via Machine Learning and Multivariate Data Reduction

1 Industrial and Management Engineering Institute, Federal University of Itajubá (UNIFEI), Itajubá, 37500-903, Brazil
* Corresponding Author: Matheus Costa Pereira, [email protected]
Volume 1, Issue 3
You have access to this article · Limited-Time Free Access

Article Information

Abstract

The classification of Capsicum spp. varieties is often hindered by their morphological similarities, making accurate identification a challenging task. To address this issue, this study applies a hybrid computational approach that combines data dimensionality reduction techniques using Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis with various supervised Machine Learning algorithms. The dataset, which is unprecedented in the literature and was collected under controlled agricultural conditions, enables a robust evaluation of models including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gradient Boosting. Model performance was assessed using Leave-One-Out and K-Fold cross-validation methods. Additionally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to assess the importance of the features in species classification, providing greater interpretability that reinforces the relevance of morphological and agronomic descriptors in differentiating pepper varieties. The results show that all models achieved high performance metrics, including accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall, consistently above 0.89, validating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. These findings highlight the potential of integrated Machine Learning frameworks for species classification in agriculture, contributing to practical applications and advancing intelligent analysis of biological data.

Graphical Abstract

Discriminating Planted Capsicum Spp. Varieties via Machine Learning and Multivariate Data Reduction

Keywords

species prediction pepper machine learning classification algorithms factor analysis

Data Availability Statement

The dataset is publicly available and can be accessed at the following link: https://github.com/Matheuscp98/PepperCapsicum.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the FAPEMIG under Grant BPD-01045-22; in part by the CAPES; in part by the CNPq; and in part by the NOMATI–UNIFEI, which provided access to laboratories, materials, and technical expertise.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Kim, S., Park, M., Yeom, S. I., Kim, Y. M., Lee, J. M., Lee, H. A., ... & Choi, D. (2014). Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nature genetics, 46(3), 270-278.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Menichini, F., Tundis, R., Bonesi, M., Loizzo, M. R., Conforti, F., Statti, G., ... & Menichini, F. (2009). The influence of fruit ripening on the phytochemical content and biological activity of Capsicum chinense Jacq. cv Habanero. Food Chemistry, 114(2), 553-560.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batiha, G. E. S., Alqahtani, A., Ojo, O. A., Shaheen, H. M., Wasef, L., Elzeiny, M., ... & Hetta, H. F. (2020). Biological properties, bioactive constituents, and pharmacokinetics of some Capsicum spp. and capsaicinoids. International journal of molecular sciences, 21(15), 5179.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Waqas, M., Naseem, A., Humphries, U. W., Hlaing, P. T., Dechpichai, P., & Wangwongchai, A. (2025). Applications of machine learning and deep learning in agriculture: A comprehensive review. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 100199.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Botero-Valencia, J., García-Pineda, V., Valencia-Arias, A., Valencia, J., Reyes-Vera, E., Mejia-Herrera, M., & Hernández-García, R. (2025). Machine learning in sustainable agriculture: systematic review and research perspectives. Agriculture, 15(4), 377.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramirez-Meraz, M., Méndez-Aguilar, R., Hidalgo-Martinez, D., Villa-Ruano, N., Zepeda-Vallejo, L. G., Vallejo-Contreras, F., ... & Becerra-Martínez, E. (2020). Experimental races of Capsicum annuum cv. jalapeno: Chemical characterization and classification by 1H NMR/machine learning. Food research international, 138, 109763.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Durmuş, Y., & Atasoy, A. F. (2023). Application of multivariate machine learning methods to investigate organic compound content of different pepper spices. Food Bioscience, 51, 102216.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hafsah, S., Surya, M. I., & Syukur, M. (2024). Classification of IPB variety of cayenne pepper genotypes using physical characteristics during the growing period until harvest using machine learning. Future Foods, 10, 100500.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lozada, D. N., Sandhu, K. S., & Bhatta, M. (2023). Ridge regression and deep learning models for genome-wide selection of complex traits in New Mexican Chile peppers. BMC Genomic Data, 24(1), 80.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meena, D., Chakraborty, S., & Mitra, J. (2024). Geographical origin identification of red chili powder using NIR spectroscopy combined with SIMCA and machine learning algorithms. Food Analytical Methods, 17(7), 1005-1023.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ropelewska, E., & Szwejda‐Grzybowska, J. (2021). A comparative analysis of the discrimination of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) based on the cross‐section and seed textures determined using image processing. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 44(6), e13694.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Danilevicz, M. F., Gill, M., Anderson, R., Batley, J., Bennamoun, M., Bayer, P. E., & Edwards, D. (2022). Plant genotype to phenotype prediction using machine learning. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 822173.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Alvares Bianchi, P., Renata Almeida da Silva, L., André da Silva Alencar, A., Henrique Araújo Diniz Santos, P., Pimenta, S., Pombo Sudré, C., ... & Rodrigues, R. (2020). Biomorphological characterization of Brazilian Capsicum chinense Jacq. germplasm. Agronomy, 10(3), 447.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeong, S., Kim, Y. K., Hur, S. H., Bang, H., Kim, H., & Chung, H. (2024). Explainable extreme gradient boosting as a machine learning tool for discrimination of the geographical origin of chili peppers using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence, and near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, 101446.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karadağ, K., Tenekeci, M. E., Taşaltın, R., & Bilgili, A. (2020). Detection of pepper fusarium disease using machine learning algorithms based on spectral reflectance. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 28, 100299.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bhagat, M., Kumar, D., & Kumar, S. (2023). Bell pepper leaf disease classification with LBP and VGG-16 based fused features and RF classifier. International journal of information technology, 15(1), 465-475.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wolpert, D. H. (2002). The supervised learning no-free-lunch theorems. Soft computing and industry: Recent applications, 25-42.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thul, S. T., Lal, R. K., Shasany, A. K., Darokar, M. P., Gupta, A. K., Gupta, M. M., ... & Khanuja, S. P. S. (2009). Estimation of phenotypic divergence in a collection of Capsicum species for yield-related traits. Euphytica, 168(2), 189-196.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ribeiro, C. S., Soares, R. S., de Carvalho, S. I., Nass, L. L., Lopes, C. A., Lima, M. F., ... & Reifschneider, F. J. (2024). BRS Araçari e BRS Biguatinga: Novas cultivares de pimenta habanero da Embrapa Hortaliças. Horticultura Brasileira, 42, e280540.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Carrizo García, C., Barfuss, M. H., Sehr, E. M., Barboza, G. E., Samuel, R., Moscone, E. A., & Ehrendorfer, F. (2016). Phylogenetic relationships, diversification and expansion of chili peppers (Capsicum, Solanaceae). Annals of botany, 118(1), 35-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sudré, C. P., Gonçalves, L. S. A., Rodrigues, R., Amaral Júnior, A. D., Riva-Souza, E. M., & Bento, C. D. S. (2010). Genetic variability in domesticated Capsicum spp. as assessed by morphological and agronomic data in mixed statistical analysis. Genetics and molecular research, 9(1), 283-294. https://www.academia.edu/download/112155709/vol9-1gmr698.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Karim, K. R., Rafii, M. Y., Misran, A. B., Ismail, M. F. B., Harun, A. R., Khan, M. M. H., & Chowdhury, M. F. N. (2021). Current and prospective strategies in the varietal improvement of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) specially heterosis breeding. Agronomy, 11(11), 2217.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Negi, R., Thakur, S., & Sharma, P. (2018). Advances in the breeding of bell pepper-a review. Intl J Curr Microbiol App Sci, 7(4), 2272-2281.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matthew, C. (2025). Notes on the use of principal component analysis in agronomic research. Grassland Research, 4(1), 1-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Teodoro, L. P. R., Silva, M. O., dos Santos, R. G., de Alcântara, J. F., Coradi, P. C., Biduski, B., ... & Teodoro, P. E. (2024). Machine learning for classification of soybean populations for industrial technological variables based on agronomic traits. Euphytica, 220(3), 40.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Szűgyi-Reiczigel, Z., Ladányi, M., Bisztray, G. D., Varga, Z., & Bodor-Pesti, P. (2022). Morphological traits evaluated with random forest method explains natural classification of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars. Plants, 11(24), 3428.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Badshah, A., Alkazemi, B. Y., Din, F., Zamli, K. Z., & Haris, M. (2024). Crop classification and yield prediction using robust machine learning models for agricultural sustainability. IEEE Access, 12, 162799-162813.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Brilhante, B. D. G., Santos, T. D. O., Santos, P. H. A. D., Kamphorst, S. H., Neto, J. D. S., Rangel, L. H., ... & Moulin, M. M. (2021). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Brazilian Capsicum germplasm. Agronomy, 11(5), 854.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lozada, D. N., Bosland, P. W., Barchenger, D. W., Haghshenas-Jaryani, M., Sanogo, S., & Walker, S. (2022). Chile pepper (Capsicum) breeding and improvement in the "multi-omics" era. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 879182.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith, A., Norman, A., Kuchel, H., & Cullis, B. (2021). Plant variety selection using interaction classes derived from factor analytic linear mixed models: models with independent variety effects. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 737462.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Deng, Q., Zhao, S., Guan, C., Fu, G., Yu, S., Lin, S., ... & Cheng, S. (2024). Construction and evaluation of pepper core collection based on phenotypic traits and SSR markers. Applied Sciences, 14(17), 7473.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mishra, S. P., Sarkar, U., Taraphder, S., Datta, S., Swain, D., Saikhom, R., ... & Laishram, M. (2017). Multivariate statistical data analysis-principal component analysis (PCA). International Journal of Livestock Research, 7(5), 60-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sperandei, S. (2014). Understanding logistic regression analysis. Biochemia medica, 24(1), 12-18.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sakeef, N., Scandola, S., Kennedy, C., Lummer, C., Chang, J., Uhrig, R. G., & Lin, G. (2023). Machine learning classification of plant genotypes grown under different light conditions through the integration of multi-scale time-series data. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 21, 3183–3195.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vapnik, V. (2013). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mahajan, S., Raina, A., Gao, X. Z., & Kant Pandit, A. (2021). Plant recognition using morphological feature extraction and transfer learning over SVM and AdaBoost. Symmetry, 13(2), 356.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hearst, M. A., Dumais, S. T., Osuna, E., Platt, J., & Scholkopf, B. (1998). Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications, 13(4), 18-28.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Çetin, N., Ozaktan, H., Uzun, S., Uzun, O., & Ciftci, C. Y. (2023). Machine learning based mass prediction and discrimination of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Euphytica, 219(1), 20.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Uddin, S., Haque, I., Lu, H., Moni, M. A., & Gide, E. (2022). Comparative performance analysis of K-nearest neighbour (KNN) algorithm and its different variants for disease prediction. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 6256.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Z. (2016). Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(11), 218.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi, M., Earl, H. J., Tulpan, D., Sulik, J., & Eskandari, M. (2021). Application of machine learning algorithms in plant breeding: predicting yield from hyperspectral reflectance in soybean. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 624273.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Blazakis, K. N., Stupichev, D., Kosma, M., El Chami, M. A. H., Apodiakou, A., Kostelenos, G., & Kalaitzis, P. (2024). Discrimination of 14 olive cultivars using morphological analysis and machine learning algorithms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1441737.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Westhues, C. C., Mahone, G. S., Da Silva, S., Thorwarth, P., Schmidt, M., Richter, J. C., ... & Beissinger, T. M. (2021). Prediction of maize phenotypic traits with genomic and environmental predictors using gradient boosting frameworks. Frontiers in plant science, 12, 699589.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine learning, 1(1), 81-106.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, 1189-1232. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2699986
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ennaji, O., Baha, S., Vergutz, L., & El Allali, A. (2024). Gradient boosting for yield prediction of elite maize hybrid ZhengDan 958. PloS one, 19(12), e0315493.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Montesinos‐López, O. A., Gonzalez, H. N., Montesinos‐López, A., Daza‐Torres, M., Lillemo, M., Montesinos‐López, J. C., & Crossa, J. (2022). Comparing gradient boosting machine and Bayesian threshold BLUP for genome‐based prediction of categorical traits in wheat breeding. The plant genome, 15(3), e20214.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wong, T. T., & Yeh, P. Y. (2019). Reliable accuracy estimates from k-fold cross validation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32(8), 1586-1594.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vabalas, A., Gowen, E., Poliakoff, E., & Casson, A. J. (2019). Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0224365.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wong, T. T. (2015). Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern recognition, 48(9), 2839-2846.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vanacore, A., Pellegrino, M. S., & Ciardiello, A. (2024). Fair evaluation of classifier predictive performance based on binary confusion matrix. Computational Statistics, 39(1), 363-383.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics, 21(1), 6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Grandini, M., Bagli, E., & Visani, G. (2020). Metrics for multi-class classification: an overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05756.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009). A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Information processing & management, 45(4), 427-437.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. (1995). Descriptors for Capsicum (Capsicum spp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/72851
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang, F., Yin, J., Wu, N., Hu, X., Sun, S., & Wang, Y. (2024). A dual-path model merging CNN and RNN with attention mechanism for crop classification. European Journal of Agronomy, 159, 127273.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Cervantes, J., Garcia-Lamont, F., Rodríguez-Mazahua, L., & Lopez, A. (2020). A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends. Neurocomputing, 408, 189-215.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
    [Google Scholar]

Cited By (4)

  1. Gaurav Dhiman, Kiran Deep Singh, Prabh Deep Singh, Norah Saleh Alghamdi, Ghadah Shukri Albakri. A novel approach to reliable and flexible distributed computing with virtualization in smart healthcare applications. Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  2. Shubhani Aggarwal, Arzoo Miglani, Norah Saleh Alghamdi, Gaurav Dhiman. Resilient and decentralized demand-side management in smart grids using blockchain. Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  3. Meenakshi Garg, Nor Asilah Wati Abdul Hamid, Dafik, Sunder R.. AI-driven feature descriptor design using CNNs and transfer learning for enhanced image retrieval accuracy and efficiency. Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  4. İlknur Dönmez, Faruk Bulut. Multidimensional diversity in video recommender systems: a holistic framework of literature gaps and future directions. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 2026 , 31 .
    [CrossRef]
* Citation data provided by Crossref Cited-by.

Cite This Article

APA Style
Pereira, M. S., de Azevedo, T. M., Ribeiro, C. T., Freire, A. I., Francisco, M. B., Pereira, J. L. J., & de Paiva, A. P. (2025). Discriminating Planted Capsicum Spp. Varieties via Machine Learning and Multivariate Data Reduction. ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence, 1(3), 166-185. https://doi.org/10.62762/TMI.2025.385133
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pereira, Matheus Costa
AU  - Azevedo, Tiago Martins de
AU  - Ribeiro, Caio Tertuliano
AU  - Freire, Ana Izabella
AU  - Francisco, Matheus Brendon
AU  - Pereira, João Luiz Junho
AU  - Paiva, Anderson Paulo de
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/11/15
TI  - Discriminating Planted Capsicum Spp. Varieties via Machine Learning and Multivariate Data Reduction
JO  - ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
T2  - ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
JF  - ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
VL  - 1
IS  - 3
SP  - 166
EP  - 185
DO  - 10.62762/TMI.2025.385133
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TMI.2025.385133
KW  - species prediction
KW  - pepper
KW  - machine learning
KW  - classification algorithms
KW  - factor analysis
AB  - The classification of Capsicum spp. varieties is often hindered by their morphological similarities, making accurate identification a challenging task. To address this issue, this study applies a hybrid computational approach that combines data dimensionality reduction techniques using Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis with various supervised Machine Learning algorithms. The dataset, which is unprecedented in the literature and was collected under controlled agricultural conditions, enables a robust evaluation of models including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gradient Boosting. Model performance was assessed using Leave-One-Out and K-Fold cross-validation methods. Additionally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to assess the importance of the features in species classification, providing greater interpretability that reinforces the relevance of morphological and agronomic descriptors in differentiating pepper varieties. The results show that all models achieved high performance metrics, including accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall, consistently above 0.89, validating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. These findings highlight the potential of integrated Machine Learning frameworks for species classification in agriculture, contributing to practical applications and advancing intelligent analysis of biological data.
SN  - 3068-7403
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Pereira2025Discrimina,
  author = {Matheus Costa Pereira and Tiago Martins de Azevedo and Caio Tertuliano Ribeiro and Ana Izabella Freire and Matheus Brendon Francisco and João Luiz Junho Pereira and Anderson Paulo de Paiva},
  title = {Discriminating Planted Capsicum Spp. Varieties via Machine Learning and Multivariate Data Reduction},
  journal = {ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {1},
  number = {3},
  pages = {166-185},
  doi = {10.62762/TMI.2025.385133},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TMI.2025.385133},
  abstract = {The classification of Capsicum spp. varieties is often hindered by their morphological similarities, making accurate identification a challenging task. To address this issue, this study applies a hybrid computational approach that combines data dimensionality reduction techniques using Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis with various supervised Machine Learning algorithms. The dataset, which is unprecedented in the literature and was collected under controlled agricultural conditions, enables a robust evaluation of models including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gradient Boosting. Model performance was assessed using Leave-One-Out and K-Fold cross-validation methods. Additionally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to assess the importance of the features in species classification, providing greater interpretability that reinforces the relevance of morphological and agronomic descriptors in differentiating pepper varieties. The results show that all models achieved high performance metrics, including accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall, consistently above 0.89, validating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. These findings highlight the potential of integrated Machine Learning frameworks for species classification in agriculture, contributing to practical applications and advancing intelligent analysis of biological data.},
  keywords = {species prediction, pepper, machine learning, classification algorithms, factor analysis},
  issn = {3068-7403},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Views
2057
PDF Downloads
565

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge (ICCK) or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
ISSN: 3068-7403 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico