A Data-Driven Framework for Methane Emission Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods
Article Information
Abstract
Greenhouse gas Methane (CH$_4$) has approximately 86 times more impact on global warming than carbon dioxide (CO$_2$) over a 20-year period, and 28 times over a 100-year period. The emission of methane gas into the atmosphere is increasing due to the reliance on fossil-based resources in post-industrial energy consumption, along with the rise in food demand and the generation of organic waste that accompanies a growing human population. CH$_4$ acts as a vital pollutant in the air. The problem addressed in this study was to accurately estimate CH$_4$ emissions from functional urban areas. This study aims to predict CH$_4$ emissions using Time Series (TS) and Machine Learning (ML) models such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and CatBoost Regressor (CABR), etc. The SARIMA model has the best combination of values (1,\,0,\,0)(1,\,1,\,0)$_{12}$. The methane emission data was collected from the World Bank Group from 2019 to 2022. Among all models, the SARIMA model predicted CH$_4$ emissions more accurately than the other models. The results obtained in the study indicate that SARIMA outperforms other techniques. The SARIMA model achieved the most accurate results in terms of R-squared score (R$^2$) = 94%; Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 2.8129; Mean Squared Error (MSE) = 7.9126; Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 1.8391, among others. This type of prediction enables the government to reduce CH$_4$ emissions at the global level.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Data Availability Statement
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
AI Use Statement
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Mar, K. A., Unger, C., Walderdorff, L., & Butler, T. (2022). Beyond CO2 equivalence: The impacts of methane on climate, ecosystems, and health. Environmental Science & Policy, 134, 127–136.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Allen, R. J., Zhao, X., Randles, C. A., Kramer, R. J., Samset, B. H., & Smith, C. J. (2023). Surface warming and wetting due to methane's long-wave radiative effects muted by short-wave absorption. Nature Geoscience, 16(4), 314–320.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Rehman, S. U., Husain, I., Hashmi, M. Z., Elashkar, E. E., Khader, J. A., & Ageli, M. (2021). Forecasting and modeling of atmospheric methane concentration. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(16), 1667.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Magazzino, C., Madaleno, M., Waqas, M., & Leogrande, A. (2024). Exploring the determinants of methane emissions from a worldwide perspective using panel data and machine learning analyses. Environmental Pollution, 348, 123807.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Ezinna, P. C., Ugwuibe, C. O., & Okwueze, F. O. (2024). Gas flaring, sustainable development goal 2 and food security reflections in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Discover Global Society, 2(1), 61.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Stern, J. P. (2025). Measurement reporting and verification of methane emissions from the gas and oil sector and consequences for LNG trade: A three year progress report (No. 46). OIES Paper: ET. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324425
[Google Scholar] - Zhang, B., LI, H., Zhong, B., & GAO, J. (2022). The situation, problems and countermeasures for the controls of China's methane emissions. China Mining Magazine, 31(2), 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2022.02.026
[Google Scholar] - Dai, F., & Wang, Y. (2024). Mitigating methane emissions: Domestic and joint efforts by the United States and China. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 20, 100398.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Mousavi, S. M., Dinan, N. M., Ansarifard, S., Borhani, F., Darvishi, A., Mustafa, F., & Naghibi, A. (2024). Unveiling the drivers of atmospheric methane variability in Iran: A 20-year exploration using spatiotemporal modeling and machine learning. Environmental Challenges, 15, 100946.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Jahan, I., Mehana, M., Matheou, G., & Viswanathan, H. (2024). Deep Learning-Based quantifications of methane emissions with field applications. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 132, 104018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Pence, I., Kumas, K., Cesmeli, M. S., & Akyüz, A. (2024). Animal-based CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions analysis: Machine learning predictions by agricultural regions and climate dynamics in varied scenarios. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 226, 109423.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Luo, R., Wang, J., & Gates, I. (2024). Forecasting Methane Data Using Multivariate Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 29(3), 441-454.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Luo, R., Wang, J., & Gates, I. (2023). Machine learning for accurate methane concentration predictions: Short-term training, long-term results. Environmental Research Communications, 5(8), 081003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Chen, S., Liu, L., Ma, Y., Zhuang, Q., & Shurpali, N. J. (2024). Quantifying global wetland methane emissions with in situ methane flux data and machine learning approaches. Earth's Future, 12(11), e2023EF004330.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Khaliq, M. A., Mustafa, F., Rehman, S. U., Shahzaman, M., Javed, Z., Sagir, M., ... & Zuo, H. (2024). Spatiotemporal investigation of near-surface CH4 and factors influencing CH4 over South, East, and Southeast Asia. Science of the Total Environment, 922, 171311.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wang, Z., Feng, M., Johnson, M. F., Lipani, A., & Chan, F. (2025). The role of reservoir size in driving methane emissions in China. Water Research, 279, 123441.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Uluocak, I. (2025). Hybrid deep learning models for predicting atmospheric methane concentrations: A comparative analysis through 2050. Science China Earth Sciences, 68(7), 2226-2236.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Habadi, M., Alqarni, M., Alsolami, F., & Alharthi, M. (2025). Enhancing global methane emissions forecasting using hybrid time series models. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 12(4), 34-43.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Luo, R., Wang, J., & Gates, I. (2024). Estimating air methane and total hydrocarbon concentrations in Alberta, Canada using machine learning. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 15(2), 101984.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Wójcik-Gront, E., & Wnuk, A. (2025). Evaluating methane emission estimates from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change compared to Sentinel-derived air-methane data. Sustainability, 17(3), 850.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Li, K., Bai, K., Jiao, P., Chen, H., He, H., Shao, L., ... & Chang, N. B. (2024). Developing unbiased estimation of atmospheric methane via machine learning and multiobjective programming based on TROPOMI and GOSAT data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 304, 114039.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Chang, H. T., Chern, Y. R., Asri, A. K., Liu, W. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Hsiao, T. C., ... & Wu, C. D. (2025). Innovating Taiwan's greenhouse gas estimation: A case study of atmospheric methane using GeoAI-Based ensemble mixed spatial prediction model. Journal of Environmental Management, 380, 125110.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Suthar, G., Singh, S., Kaul, N., & Khandelwal, S. (2024). Analyzing methane emissions in five Indian cities using TROPOMI data from sentinel-5 precursor satellite. Urban Climate, 58, 102174.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Majumder, R., Pollard, J., Salek, M. S., Werth, D., Comert, G., Gale, A., ... & Chowdhury, M. (2024). Development and evaluation of ensemble learning-based environmental methane detection and intensity prediction models. Environmental Health Insights, 18, 11786302241227307.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Ai, X., Hu, C., Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, H., Zhang, J., ... & Xiao, W. (2024). Quantification of Central and Eastern China's atmospheric CH4 enhancement changes and its contributions based on machine learning approach. journal of environmental sciences, 138, 236-248.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., aan de Brugh, J., Schneider, A., ... & Landgraf, J. (2021). Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14(1), 665-684.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Gu, X., Yao, L., Xiao, X., Wu, L., & Yu, H. (2025). Optimizing methane flux prediction and key feature identification based on a novel hybrid machine learning model. iScience, 28(12).
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Venkatesa, P. N. B., Kalpana, M., Balakrishnan, N., Balamurugan, V., Suresh, A., Rajavel, M., & Dhivya, R. (2025). Using machine learning models to forecast methane emissions from agriculture in India. Plant Science Today, 12(2).
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] - Yaro, A. S., Maly, F., & Prazak, P. (2023). Outlier detection in time-series receive signal strength observation using Z-score method with S n scale estimator for indoor localization. Applied Sciences, 13(6), 3900.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cited By (5)
-
Meenakshi Garg, Nor Asilah Wati Abdul Hamid, Dafik, Sunder R.. AI-driven feature descriptor design using CNNs and transfer learning for enhanced image retrieval accuracy and efficiency.
Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
[CrossRef] -
Ganime Tuğba Önder. A comparative analysis of advanced modeling techniques for global methane emission forecasting using SARIMA, LSTM, and GRU models.
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2026 , 28 (7).
[CrossRef] -
İlknur Dönmez, Faruk Bulut. Multidimensional diversity in video recommender systems: a holistic framework of literature gaps and future directions.
Intelligent Systems with Applications, 2026 , 31 .
[CrossRef] -
Gaurav Dhiman, Kiran Deep Singh, Prabh Deep Singh, Norah Saleh Alghamdi, Ghadah Shukri Albakri. A novel approach to reliable and flexible distributed computing with virtualization in smart healthcare applications.
Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
[CrossRef] -
Shubhani Aggarwal, Arzoo Miglani, Norah Saleh Alghamdi, Gaurav Dhiman. Resilient and decentralized demand-side management in smart grids using blockchain.
Scientific Reports, 2026 , 16 (1).
[CrossRef]
Cite This Article
TY - JOUR
AU - Arya, Suraj
AU - Anju
AU - Onah, Jonas Nnaemeka
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/12
TI - A Data-Driven Framework for Methane Emission Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods
JO - ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
T2 - ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
JF - ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence
VL - 2
IS - 1
SP - 53
EP - 64
DO - 10.62762/TMI.2025.782852
UR - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TMI.2025.782852
KW - machine learning
KW - methane emission
KW - random forest regressor
KW - prediction
AB - Greenhouse gas Methane (CH$_4$) has approximately 86 times more impact on global warming than carbon dioxide (CO$_2$) over a 20-year period, and 28 times over a 100-year period. The emission of methane gas into the atmosphere is increasing due to the reliance on fossil-based resources in post-industrial energy consumption, along with the rise in food demand and the generation of organic waste that accompanies a growing human population. CH$_4$ acts as a vital pollutant in the air. The problem addressed in this study was to accurately estimate CH$_4$ emissions from functional urban areas. This study aims to predict CH$_4$ emissions using Time Series (TS) and Machine Learning (ML) models such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and CatBoost Regressor (CABR), etc. The SARIMA model has the best combination of values (1,\,0,\,0)(1,\,1,\,0)$_{12}$. The methane emission data was collected from the World Bank Group from 2019 to 2022. Among all models, the SARIMA model predicted CH$_4$ emissions more accurately than the other models. The results obtained in the study indicate that SARIMA outperforms other techniques. The SARIMA model achieved the most accurate results in terms of R-squared score (R$^2$) = 94%; Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 2.8129; Mean Squared Error (MSE) = 7.9126; Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 1.8391, among others. This type of prediction enables the government to reduce CH$_4$ emissions at the global level.
SN - 3068-7403
PB - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA - English
ER -
@article{Arya2026A,
author = {Suraj Arya and Anju and Jonas Nnaemeka Onah},
title = {A Data-Driven Framework for Methane Emission Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods},
journal = {ICCK Transactions on Machine Intelligence},
year = {2026},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {53-64},
doi = {10.62762/TMI.2025.782852},
url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TMI.2025.782852},
abstract = {Greenhouse gas Methane (CH\$\_4\$) has approximately 86 times more impact on global warming than carbon dioxide (CO\$\_2\$) over a 20-year period, and 28 times over a 100-year period. The emission of methane gas into the atmosphere is increasing due to the reliance on fossil-based resources in post-industrial energy consumption, along with the rise in food demand and the generation of organic waste that accompanies a growing human population. CH\$\_4\$ acts as a vital pollutant in the air. The problem addressed in this study was to accurately estimate CH\$\_4\$ emissions from functional urban areas. This study aims to predict CH\$\_4\$ emissions using Time Series (TS) and Machine Learning (ML) models such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and CatBoost Regressor (CABR), etc. The SARIMA model has the best combination of values (1,\,0,\,0)(1,\,1,\,0)\$\_{12}\$. The methane emission data was collected from the World Bank Group from 2019 to 2022. Among all models, the SARIMA model predicted CH\$\_4\$ emissions more accurately than the other models. The results obtained in the study indicate that SARIMA outperforms other techniques. The SARIMA model achieved the most accurate results in terms of R-squared score (R\$^2\$) = 94\%; Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 2.8129; Mean Squared Error (MSE) = 7.9126; Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 1.8391, among others. This type of prediction enables the government to reduce CH\$\_4\$ emissions at the global level.},
keywords = {machine learning, methane emission, random forest regressor, prediction},
issn = {3068-7403},
publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}
Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and Permissions
Portico