Volume 1, Issue 2, Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
Volume 1, Issue 2, 2025
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Digital Intelligence in Agriculture, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2025: 79-95

Open Access | Research Article | 18 December 2025
Robust Detection of Maize Foliage Fungal Diseases using Tree-Based Ensemble Methods
1 Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 211002, India
2 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Allahabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 211015, India
3 Department of Botany, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 211002, India
4 Yamaha Motor Solution Private Limited, Faridabad, Haryana 121003, India
5 Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 211007, India
* Corresponding Author: Ramesh Kumar Bhukya, [email protected]
ARK: ark:/57805/dia.2025.672386
Received: 23 October 2025, Accepted: 23 November 2025, Published: 18 December 2025  
Abstract
Maize productivity in India, a major global producer, is severely threatened by leaf diseases. Accurate identification of Common Rust (CR), Northern Corn Leaf Blight (NCLB), and Gray Leaf Spot (GLS) remains challenging with traditional methods. This study evaluated traditional and ensemble-based classifiers for classifying these diseases alongside healthy (HL) leaves. Using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, we assessed k-NN, DT, RF, ETs, AdaBoost, SGD, GB, XGBoost, LightGBM, and a Stacking model on a four-class dataset. Ensemble methods demonstrated clear superiority. The Stacking model achieved the highest accuracy (98.50%), followed by LightGBM (98.46%) and XGBoost (98.01%). Among conventional models, ETs (97.38%) and RF (96.93%) outperformed others. While HL was consistently identified, GLS proved most challenging, especially for non-ensemble methods. The results underscore the robustness and superior generalization capability of tree-based ensemble methods for imbalanced multi-class disease classification.

Graphical Abstract
Robust Detection of Maize Foliage Fungal Diseases using Tree-Based Ensemble Methods

Keywords
maize leaf disease detection
image-based disease classification
plant pathology informatics
agricultural data analytics
artificial intelligence in agriculture
precision agriculture
machine learning
ensemble learning

Data Availability Statement
The dataset used in this study is an organized subset of the publicly available PlantVillage dataset hosted on Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/abdallahalidev/plantvillage-dataset). The complete PlantVillage dataset, originally introduced by Hughes and Salathé, contains approximately 217,000 images that span 38 categories of healthy and diseased plant leaves, and can be accessed via the original source at https://github.com/spMohanty/PlantVillage-Dataset.

Funding
This work was supported by the Telecommunications Consultants India Limited (TCIL), a Government of India company under administrative control of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), as part of the prestigious “100 5G Use Case Labs” initiative.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Rupesh Kumar is an employee of Yamaha Motor Solution Private Limited, Faridabad, Haryana 121003, India.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.

References
  1. Banik, A., Patil, T., Vartak, P., & Jadhav, V. (2023, May). Machine learning in agriculture: A neural network approach. In 2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  2. Panigrahi, K. P., Sahoo, A. K., & Das, H. (2020, June). A cnn approach for corn leaves disease detection to support digital agricultural system. In 2020 4th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)(48184) (pp. 678-683). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  3. Rout, J. K., Rout, M., & Das, H. (2020). Machine learning for intelligent decision science. Springer.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashwini, C., & Sellam, V. (2022). Corn disease detection based on deep neural network for substantiating the crop yield. Appl Math, 16(3), 423–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/160304
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Patrekar, S., Samrat, R., Kunder, S. R., Bhat, A., & Nikhil, P. B. (2025, February). AgriScan: Next-Gen Corn Leaf Disease Detection and Analysis Using Deep Learning Models. In 2025 3rd IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics: Developments & Applications (ICIDeA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  6. Ma, L., Yu, Q., Yu, H., & Zhang, J. (2023). Maize leaf disease identification based on yolov5n algorithm incorporating attention mechanism. Agronomy, 13(2), 521.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, J., He, C., Jiang, Y., Wang, M., Ye, Z., & He, M. (2024). A high-precision identification method for maize leaf diseases and pests based on LFMNet under complex backgrounds. Plants, 13(13), 1827.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  8. Sun, X., & Huo, H. (2025). Corn leaf disease recognition based on improved EfficientNet. IET Image Processing, 19(1), e13288.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  9. Santhi, S., Srinivasan, T., & RS, S. G. (2025, March). Smart Agriculture: An AI Based Solution for Early Corn Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning. In 2025 International Conference on Machine Learning and Autonomous Systems (ICMLAS) (pp. 648-654). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  10. Thorat, A., Kumari, S., & Valakunde, N. D. (2017, December). An IoT based smart solution for leaf disease detection. In 2017 international conference on big data, IoT and data science (BID) (pp. 193-198). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  11. Sambana, B., Nnadi, H. S., Wajid, M. A., Fidelia, N. O., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Ajuzie, H. D., & Onyema, E. M. (2025). An efficient plant disease detection using transfer learning approach. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 19082.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  12. Upadhyay, A., Chandel, N. S., Singh, K. P., Chakraborty, S. K., Nandede, B. M., Kumar, M., Subeesh, A., Upendar, K., Salem, A., & Elbeltagi, A. (2025). Deep learning and computer vision in plant disease detection: a comprehensive review of techniques, models, and trends in precision agriculture. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(3), 92.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  13. Rani, R., Sahoo, J., Bellamkonda, S., Kumar, S., & Pippal, S. K. (2023). Role of artificial intelligence in agriculture: An analysis and advancements with focus on plant diseases. IEEE Access, 11, 137999–138019.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin, Z., Mu, S., Shi, A., Pang, C., Sun, X., & others. (2018). A novel method of maize leaf disease image identification based on a multichannel convolutional neural network. Transactions of the ASABE, 61(5), 1461–1474.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, G., Zhang, W., Chen, A., He, M., & Ma, X. (2019). Rapid detection of rice disease based on FCM-KM and faster R-CNN fusion. IEEE Access, 7, 143190–143206.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  16. Mwebaze, E., Gebru, T., Frome, A., Nsumba, S., & Tusubira, J. (2019). iCassava 2019 fine-grained visual categorization challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02900.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, P., Chen, Y., Liu, B., He, D., & Liang, C. (2019). Real-time detection of apple leaf diseases using deep learning approach based on improved convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access, 7, 59069–59080.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao, A., Geng, A., Song, Y., Ren, L., Zhang, Y., & Han, X. (2023). Detection of maize leaf diseases using improved MobileNet V3-small. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 16(3), 225-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20231603.7799
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferentinos, K. P. (2018). Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 145, 311-318.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma, J., Du, K., Zhang, L., Zheng, F., Chu, J., & Sun, Z. (2017). A segmentation method for greenhouse vegetable foliar disease spots images using color information and region growing. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 142, 110-117.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan, M. A., Akram, T., Sharif, M., Awais, M., Javed, K., Ali, H., & Saba, T. (2018). CCDF: Automatic system for segmentation and recognition of fruit crops diseases based on correlation coefficient and deep CNN features. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 155, 220–236.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, Z., Mu, S., Huang, F., Mateen, K. A., Wang, M., Gao, W., & Jia, J. (2019). A unified matrix-based convolutional neural network for fine-grained image classification of wheat leaf diseases. IEEE Access, 7, 11570–11590.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, S., Huang, W., & Zhang, C. (2019). Three-channel convolutional neural networks for vegetable leaf disease recognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 53, 31–41.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma, J., Du, K., Zheng, F., Zhang, L., Gong, Z., & Sun, Z. (2018). A recognition method for cucumber diseases using leaf symptom images based on deep convolutional neural network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 154, 18–24.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  25. Sladojevic, S., Arsenovic, M., Anderla, A., Culibrk, D., & Stefanovic, D. (2016). Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016(1), 3289801.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  26. Singh, D., Rana, A., Gupta, A., Sharma, R., & Kukreja, V. (2023). An enhanced CNN-LSTM based hybrid deep learning model for corn leaf eye spot disease classification. In 2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT) (pp. 147–151). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  27. Pai, P., Amutha, S., Basthikodi, M., Ahamed Shafeeq, B. M., Chaitra, K. M., & Gurpur, A. P. (2025). A twin CNN-based framework for optimized rice leaf disease classification with feature fusion. Journal of Big Data, 12(1), 89.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  28. Maglogiannis, I., Papadopoulos, H., & Iliadis, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications and innovations. Springer.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh, T., Bhadwaj, H., Verma, L., Navadia, N. R., Singh, D., Sakalle, A., & Bhardwaj, A. (2022). Applications of AI in agriculture. Challenges and opportunities for deep learning applications in industry 4.0, 181.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ouppaphan, P. (2017, November). Corn disease identification from leaf images using convolutional neural networks. In 2017 21st International computer science and engineering conference (ICSEC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  32. Pacal, I., & Işik, G. (2025). Utilizing convolutional neural networks and vision transformers for precise corn leaf disease identification. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(4), 2479–2496.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  33. Amin, H., Darwish, A., Hassanien, A. E., & Soliman, M. (2022). End-to-end deep learning model for corn leaf disease classification. Ieee Access, 10, 31103–31115.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  34. Balaska, V., Adamidou, Z., Vryzas, Z., & Gasteratos, A. (2023). Sustainable crop protection via robotics and artificial intelligence solutions. Machines, 11(8), 774.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  35. Reda, M., Suwwan, R., Alkafri, S., Rashed, Y., & Shanableh, T. (2022). Agroaid: A mobile app system for visual classification of plant species and diseases using deep learning and tensorflow lite. Informatics, 9(3), 55.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  36. Bhujel, A., Kim, N. E., Arulmozhi, E., Basak, J. K., & Kim, H. T. (2022). A lightweight attention-based convolutional neural networks for tomato leaf disease classification. Agriculture, 12(2), 228.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  37. Barbedo, J. G. A. (2018). Impact of dataset size and variety on the effectiveness of deep learning and transfer learning for plant disease classification. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 153, 46-53.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  38. Song, K., Sun, X. Y., & Ji, J. W. (2007). Corn leaf disease recognition based on support vector machine method. Transactions of the CSAE, 23(1), 155–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Dash, A., Sethy, P. K., & Behera, S. K. (2023). Maize disease identification based on optimized support vector machine using deep feature of DenseNet201. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 14, 100824.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  40. Daneshwari, A. N., & Basavaraju, D. R. (2022). Corn leaf image classification based on machine learning techniques for accurate leaf disease detection. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 12(3), 2509.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  41. Appalanaidu, M. V., & Kumaravelan, G. (2024). Classification of Plant Disease using Machine Learning Algorithms. In 2024 Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (CCICT) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  42. Priyaradhikadevi, T., Mohan, R., Ragupathi, T., Prasanna, S., Madhan, K., & Ananthi, R. (2023). Leaf disease detection using machine learning algorithm. In 2023 Eighth International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaisakthi, S. M., Mirunalini, P., & Thenmozhi, D. (2019, February). Grape leaf disease identification using machine learning techniques. In 2019 International conference on computational intelligence in data science (ICCIDS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  44. Sami, A. K., & Al-Dulaimi, K. (2024). Plant Leaf Diseases Classification Using SVMs, XGBoost, and CNNs Based Texture Features. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET) (pp. 354–359). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  45. Lokhande, N., Thool, V., & Vikhe, P. (2024). Comparative analysis of different plant leaf disease classification and detection using CNN. In 2024 International Conference on Recent Innovation in Smart and Sustainable Technology (ICRISST) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  46. Reddy, A. M., & Shaik, S. S. (2022). An automatic plant disease detection system using deep learning technique. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, 71(3), 152–158. https://www.philstat.org/index.php/MSEA/article/view/121
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hassan, S. M., Maji, A. K., Jasiński, M., Leonowicz, Z., & Jasińska, E. (2021). Identification of plant-leaf diseases using CNN and transfer-learning approach. Electronics, 10(12), 1388.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  48. Taunk, K., De, S., Verma, S., & Swetapadma, A. (2019). A brief review of nearest neighbor algorithm for learning and classification. In 2019 international conference on intelligent computing and control systems (ICCS) (pp. 1255–1260). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  49. Mienye, I. D., & Jere, N. (2024). A survey of decision trees: Concepts, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Access, 12, 86716–86727.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  50. Suthaharan, S. (2016). Support vector machine. In Machine learning models and algorithms for big data classification: thinking with examples for effective learning (pp. 207-235). Boston, MA: Springer US.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  51. Iranzad, R., & Liu, X. (2025). A review of random forest-based feature selection methods for data science education and applications. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 20(2), 197-211.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  52. Aminifar, A., Shokri, M., Rabbi, F., Pun, V. K. I., & Lamo, Y. (2022). Extremely randomized trees with privacy preservation for distributed structured health data. IEEE Access, 10, 6010–6027.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  53. Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021). A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(3), 1937–1967.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  54. Catapang, J. K. (2022). Optimizing speed and accuracy trade-off in machine learning models via stochastic gradient descent approximation. In 2022 9th International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI) (pp. 124–128). IEEE.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  55. Chengsheng, T., Huacheng, L., & Bing, X. (2017). AdaBoost typical Algorithm and its application research. MATEC Web of Conferences, 139, 00222.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  56. Jayasooriya, R. I. L., & Arachchi, S. M. (2022). Diagnosis of bacterial leaf blight, brown spots, and leaf smut rice plant diseases using light GBM. Int. J. Comput. Appl, 183(48), 53–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Takahashi, K., Yamamoto, K., Kuchiba, A., & Koyama, T. (2022). Confidence interval for micro-averaged F 1 and macro-averaged F 1 scores. Applied Intelligence, 52(5), 4961–4972.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  58. Sharma, A., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Thakur, R., Gupta, B. B., & Arya, V. (2024). IoT-enabled smart farming with Industry 5.0. Journal of High Speed Networks, 30(3), 477-496.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  59. Subedi, S. (2015). A review on important maize diseases and their management in Nepal. Journal of Maize Research and Development, 1(1), 28–52.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  60. Putro, S. S., Syakur, M. A., Rochman, E. M. S., & Rachmad, A. (2023). Prediction of corn crop yield using backpropagation neural network algorithm. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2679(1), 020006.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  61. Aboelenin, S., Elbasheer, F. A., Eltoukhy, M. M., El-Hady, W. M., & Hosny, K. M. (2025). A hybrid Framework for plant leaf disease detection and classification using convolutional neural networks and vision transformer. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 11(2), 142.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  62. Arya, S., & Singh, R. (2019). An analysis of deep learning techniques for plant leaf disease detection. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 17(7), 73–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016). Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 215232.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  64. Nazari, L., & Zinati, Z. (2023). Gene expression classification for biomarker identification in maize subjected to various biotic stresses. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 20(3), 2170–2176.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  65. Li, P., Cao, W., Fang, H., Xu, S., Yin, S., Zhang, Y., ... & Yang, Z. (2017). Transcriptomic profiling of the maize (Zea mays L.) leaf response to abiotic stresses at the seedling stage. Frontiers in plant science, 8, 290.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  66. Gadag, R. N., Bhat, J. S., Mukri, G., Gogoi, R., Suby, S. B., Das, A. K., ... & Shilpa, K. (2021). Resistance to biotic stress: theory and applications in maize breeding. In Genomic designing for biotic stress resistant cereal crops (pp. 129-175). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  67. Quan, S., Wang, J., Jia, Z., Xu, Q., & Yang, M. (2024). Real-time field disease identification based on a lightweight model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 226, 109467.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  68. Daphal, S. D., & Koli, S. M. (2023). Enhancing sugarcane disease classification with ensemble deep learning: A comparative study with transfer learning techniques. Heliyon, 9(8).
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  69. Ojo, M. O., & Zahid, A. (2023). Improving deep learning classifiers performance via preprocessing and class imbalance approaches in a plant disease detection pipeline. Agronomy, 13(3), 887.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]
  70. Rodríguez-Lira, D. C., Córdova-Esparza, D. M., Álvarez-Alvarado, J. M., Terven, J., Romero-González, J. A., & Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J. (2024). Trends in machine and deep learning techniques for plant disease identification: a systematic review. Agriculture, 14(12), 2188.
    [CrossRef]   [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article
APA Style
Shrivastava, P. C., Masood, M. S., Kumar, A., Bhukya, R. K., Kaur, H., Kumar, R., & Denis, D. M. (2025). Robust Detection of Maize Foliage Fungal Diseases using Tree-Based Ensemble Methods. Digital Intelligence in Agriculture, 1(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.62762/DIA.2025.672386
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
RIS format data for reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Shrivastava, Prabhat Chandra
AU  - Masood, Mohammad Saheeb
AU  - Kumar, Aman
AU  - Bhukya, Ramesh Kumar
AU  - Kaur, Harmanjit
AU  - Kumar, Rupesh
AU  - Denis, Derrick Mario
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/12/18
TI  - Robust Detection of Maize Foliage Fungal Diseases using Tree-Based Ensemble Methods
JO  - Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
T2  - Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
JF  - Digital Intelligence in Agriculture
VL  - 1
IS  - 2
SP  - 79
EP  - 95
DO  - 10.62762/DIA.2025.672386
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/DIA.2025.672386
KW  - maize leaf disease detection
KW  - image-based disease classification
KW  - plant pathology informatics
KW  - agricultural data analytics
KW  - artificial intelligence in agriculture
KW  - precision agriculture
KW  - machine learning
KW  - ensemble learning
AB  - Maize productivity in India, a major global producer, is severely threatened by leaf diseases. Accurate identification of Common Rust (CR), Northern Corn Leaf Blight (NCLB), and Gray Leaf Spot (GLS) remains challenging with traditional methods. This study evaluated traditional and ensemble-based classifiers for classifying these diseases alongside healthy (HL) leaves. Using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, we assessed k-NN, DT, RF, ETs, AdaBoost, SGD, GB, XGBoost, LightGBM, and a Stacking model on a four-class dataset. Ensemble methods demonstrated clear superiority. The Stacking model achieved the highest accuracy (98.50%), followed by LightGBM (98.46%) and XGBoost (98.01%). Among conventional models, ETs (97.38%) and RF (96.93%) outperformed others. While HL was consistently identified, GLS proved most challenging, especially for non-ensemble methods. The results underscore the robustness and superior generalization capability of tree-based ensemble methods for imbalanced multi-class disease classification.
SN  - 3069-3187
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
BibTeX format data for LaTeX and reference managers
@article{Shrivastava2025Robust,
  author = {Prabhat Chandra Shrivastava and Mohammad Saheeb Masood and Aman Kumar and Ramesh Kumar Bhukya and Harmanjit Kaur and Rupesh Kumar and Derrick Mario Denis},
  title = {Robust Detection of Maize Foliage Fungal Diseases using Tree-Based Ensemble Methods},
  journal = {Digital Intelligence in Agriculture},
  year = {2025},
  volume = {1},
  number = {2},
  pages = {79-95},
  doi = {10.62762/DIA.2025.672386},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/DIA.2025.672386},
  abstract = {Maize productivity in India, a major global producer, is severely threatened by leaf diseases. Accurate identification of Common Rust (CR), Northern Corn Leaf Blight (NCLB), and Gray Leaf Spot (GLS) remains challenging with traditional methods. This study evaluated traditional and ensemble-based classifiers for classifying these diseases alongside healthy (HL) leaves. Using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, we assessed k-NN, DT, RF, ETs, AdaBoost, SGD, GB, XGBoost, LightGBM, and a Stacking model on a four-class dataset. Ensemble methods demonstrated clear superiority. The Stacking model achieved the highest accuracy (98.50\%), followed by LightGBM (98.46\%) and XGBoost (98.01\%). Among conventional models, ETs (97.38\%) and RF (96.93\%) outperformed others. While HL was consistently identified, GLS proved most challenging, especially for non-ensemble methods. The results underscore the robustness and superior generalization capability of tree-based ensemble methods for imbalanced multi-class disease classification.},
  keywords = {maize leaf disease detection, image-based disease classification, plant pathology informatics, agricultural data analytics, artificial intelligence in agriculture, precision agriculture, machine learning, ensemble learning},
  issn = {3069-3187},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics
Citations:

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 356
PDF Downloads: 87

Publisher's Note
ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions
CC BY Copyright © 2025 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Digital Intelligence in Agriculture

Digital Intelligence in Agriculture

ISSN: 3069-3187 (Online)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/icck/