Reservoir Characterization of Eocene Carbonates and Cambrian Sands in the Eastern Potwar Region, Pakistan
Research Article  ·  Published: 25 March 2026
Issue cover
Reservoir Science
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026: 111-125
Research Article Open Access

Reservoir Characterization of Eocene Carbonates and Cambrian Sands in the Eastern Potwar Region, Pakistan

1 School of Resources and Safety Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2 Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3 Government Postgraduate College Bannu, Higher Education Department, KPK, Pakistan
4 Department of Mining and Explosives Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, MO 65409, United States
5 Sustainable Advanced Geomechanical Engineering, Military College of Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Risalpur 23200, Pakistan
* Corresponding Author: Majid Khan, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 2

Article Information

Published in Reservoir Science
Pages 111-125

Abstract

Hydrocarbon prospectivity in fold-and-thrust belts remains inherently uncertain due to the combined effects of structural complexity and heterogeneous reservoir properties. The Eastern Potwar region of Pakistan, characterized by imbricate thrust systems, anticlines, and synclines, represents a typical example where conventional approaches often fail to adequately constrain reservoir quality. This study integrates seismic interpretation with rock physics modeling to evaluate the hydrocarbon potential of the Missakeswal area. Seismic analysis delineates the structural framework controlling trap development, while rock physics modeling of well log data provides quantitative constraints on lithology, porosity, and fluid effects within Eocene carbonates and Cambrian sandstones. The results demonstrate a clear inverse relationship between velocity and porosity in the carbonate units, together with significant deviations from standard empirical models in both carbonate and sandstone intervals. In particular, the Eocene carbonates exhibit deviations of up to 25% from the Raymer model for water-saturated limestone, indicating probable hydrocarbon saturation, whereas the Cambrian sands show dispersion consistent with clay-influenced elastic behavior. The integrated interpretation highlights the Missakeswal area as a promising exploration target, and demonstrates that the combined use of seismic and rock physics analysis provides a robust framework for reducing uncertainty and improving reservoir characterization in tectonically complex basins.

Graphical Abstract

Reservoir Characterization of Eocene Carbonates and Cambrian Sands in the Eastern Potwar Region, Pakistan

Keywords

reservoir characterization velocity-porosity relationship seismic interpretation rock physics modeling

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant FRF-TP-25-001, and by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (International Scientists Project) under Grant IS23116.

Conflicts of Interest

Majid Khan served as an Editorial Board Member, and Naseer Muhammad Khan served as an Associate Editor of the Reservoir Science at the time of manuscript submission. To ensure the integrity of the peer-review process, neither Majid Khan nor Naseer Muhammad Khan was involved in the editorial handling, peer review, or decision-making process for this manuscript, which was handled independently by another editor. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Searle, M. P., & Khan, M. A. (Eds.). (1996). Geological Map of North Pakistan and Adjacent Areas of Northern Ladakh and Western Tibet.(Western Himalaya, Salt Ranges, Kohistan, Karakoram, Hindu Kush), 1: 650 000. Available at: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/3782644
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aleardi, M., & Ciabarri, F. (2017). Assessment of different approaches to rock-physics modeling: A case study from offshore Nile Delta. Geophysics, 82(1), MR15-MR25.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Suleymanov, V., El-Husseiny, A., Glatz, G., & Dvorkin, J. (2023). Rock physics and machine learning comparison: elastic properties prediction and scale dependency. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, 1095252.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wawrzyniak-Guz, K. (2019). Rock physics modelling for determination of effective elastic properties of the lower Paleozoic shale formation, North Poland. Acta Geophysica, 67(6), 1967-1989.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benkert, R., Prabhushankar, M., & AlRegib, G. (2024). Effective data selection for seismic interpretation through disagreement. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62, 1-12.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alabbad, A., Humphrey, J. D., El-Husseiny, A., Altowairqi, Y., & Dvorkin, J. P. (2023). Rock physics modeling and quantitative seismic interpretation workflow for organic-rich mudrocks. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 227, 211824.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Han, D. H., Nur, A., & Morgan, D. (1986). Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones. Geophysics, 51(11), 2093-2107.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tosaya, C., & Nur, A. (1982). Effects of diagenesis and clays on compressional velocities in rocks. Geophysical Research Letters, 9(1), 5-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L., & Eastwood, R. L. (1985). Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. geophysics, 50(4), 571-581.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., & Dvorkin, J. (2020). The Rock Physics Handbook (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Avseth, P. A., & Odegaard, E. (2004). Well log and seismic data analysis using rock physics templates. First Break, 22(10), 37-43.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, S., & Payne, M. A. (2009). Modeling elastic properties in carbonate rocks. The Leading Edge, 28(1), 66-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bredesen, K., Avseth, P., Johansen, T. A., & Olstad, R. (2019). Rock physics modelling based on depositional and burial history of Barents Sea sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting, 67(4-Rock Physics: from microstructure to seismic signatures), 825-842.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dræge, A., Jakobsen, M., & Johansen, T. A. (2004, January). Rock physics modelling of shale cementation. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts (Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1778-1781). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ali, M., Wei, N., Changxingyue, H., Lin, K., Wang, W., Ehsan, M., ... & Ashraf, U. (2026). Advancing Seismic Facies Analysis and Reservoir Characterization: A Synthetic Data-Augmented CNN and Transfer Learning Workflow Integrated with Real Seismic Data. Gas Science and Engineering, 205831.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalvand, M., & Falahat, R. (2021). A new rock physics model to estimate shear velocity log. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 196, 107697.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhu, X., Sahoo, S. K., Zhu, Z., Pang, W., Li, L., Spangenberg, E., ... & Best, A. I. (2026). Dependence of Archie’s saturation exponent on hydrate saturation and hydrate morphology: a study from fluid-displacing and fracture-filling hydrate reservoirs. Geophysical Journal International, 244(1), ggaf448.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Asif, M., Fazeelat, T., & Grice, K. (2011). Petroleum geochemistry of the Potwar Basin, Pakistan: 1. Oil-oil correlation using biomarkers, $\delta$13C and $\delta$D. Organic Geochemistry, 42(10), 1226-1240.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Craig, J., Hakhoo, N., Bhat, G. M., Hafiz, M., Khan, M. R., Misra, R., ... & Khullar, S. (2018). Petroleum systems and hydrocarbon potential of the North-West Himalaya of India and Pakistan. Earth-science reviews, 187, 109-185.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Durrani, M. Z. A., Rahman, S. A., Talib, M., Subhani, G., & Sarosh, B. (2023). Rock physics modelling‐based characterization of deep and tight mixed sedimentary (clastic and carbonate) reservoirs: A case study from North Potwar Basin of Pakistan. Geophysical Prospecting, 71(2), 263-278.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grelaud, S., Sassi, W., de Lamotte, D. F., Jaswal, T., & Roure, F. (2002). Kinematics of eastern Salt Range and South Potwar basin (Pakistan): a new scenario. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 19(9), 1127-1139.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Khan, M., Nawaz, S., & Radwan, A. E. (2023). New insights into tectonic evolution and deformation mechanism of continental foreland fold-thrust belt. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 245, 105556.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Iqbal, S., Akhter, G., & Bibi, S. (2015). Structural model of the Balkassar area, Potwar Plateau, Pakistan. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 104(8), 2253-2272.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ahmad, N., Khan, S., Noor, E. F., Zou, Z., & Al-Shuhail, A. (2021). Seismic data interpretation and identification of hydrocarbon-bearing zones of Rajian area, Pakistan. Minerals, 11(8), 891.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Safi, I., Rehman, G., Yaseen, M., Wahid, S., Nouman, M., Fida, S., ... & Anjum, M. N. (2021). Effects of transpression on the rocks exposed at the Jhelum Fault Zone in the east of Potwar Basin, Pakistan: implications on the subsurface deformation pattern. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 11(6), 2407-2424.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaswal, T. M., Lillie, R. J., & Lawrence, R. D. (1997). Structure and evolution of the northern Potwar deformed zone, Pakistan. AAPG bulletin, 81(2), 308-328.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pennock, E. S., Lillie, R. J., Zaman, A. S. H., & Yousaf, M. (1989). Structural interpretation of seismic reflection data from eastern Salt Range and Potwar Plateau, Pakistan. AAPG bulletin, 73(7), 841-857.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Awais, M., Hanif, M., Khan, M. Y., Jan, I. U., & Ishaq, M. (2019). Relating petrophysical parameters to petrographic interpretations in carbonates of the Chorgali Formation, Potwar Plateau, Pakistan. Carbonates and Evaporites, 34(3), 581-595.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Farah, A., & DeJong, K. A. (Eds.). (1979). Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kazmi, A. H., & Rana, R. A. (1982). Tectonic map of Pakistan 1: 2 000 000: Map showing structural features and tectonic stages in Pakistan. Geological survey of Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yeats, R. S., & Lawrence, R. D. (1982, November). Tectonics of the Himalayan thrust belt in northern Pakistan. In US-Pakistan Workshop on Marine Sciences in Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Baker, D. M., Lillie, R. J., Yeats, R. S., Johnson, G. D., Yousuf, M., & Zamin, A. S. H. (1988). Development of the Himalayan frontal thrust zone: Salt Range, Pakistan. Geology, 16(1), 3-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaumé, S. C., & Lillie, R. J. (1988). Mechanics of the Salt Range‐Potwar Plateau, Pakistan: A fold‐and‐thrust belt underlain by evaporites. Tectonics, 7(1), 57-71.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Khan, M., Liu, Y., & Din, S. Z. U. (2020). Presenting meso-cenozoic seismic sequential stratigraphy of the offshore indus basin Pakistan. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 300, 106431.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Michum Jr, R. M. (1977). The Depositional Sequence as a Basic Unit for Stratigraphic Analysis, Seismic Stratigraphy applications to hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG, Mem., 26, 53-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Qayyum, A., Poessé, J. W., Kaymakci, N., Langereis, C. G., Gülyüz, E., & Ahsan, N. (2022). Neogene kinematics of the Potwar plateau and the Salt range, NW Himalayan front: A paleostress inversion and AMS study. International Geology Review, 64(9), 1311-1329.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ravaut, C., Operto, S., Improta, L., Virieux, J., Herrero, A., & Dell'Aversana, P. (2004). Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by frequency-domain full-waveform tomography: Application to a thrust belt. Geophysical Journal International, 159(3), 1032-1056.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Brown, A. R. (2011). Interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheriff, R. E., & Geldart, L. P. (2015). Exploration Seismology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Treloar, P. J. (2000). Kazmi, A.H. and Jan, M.Q. Geology and Tectonics of Pakistan. [Book Review]. Mineralogical Magazine, 64(1), 163–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Leathers, M. R. (1987). Balanced structural cross section of the western Salt Range and Potwar Plateau, Pakistan: deformation near the strike-slip terminus of an overthrust sheet (Master’s thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shah, S. B. A., Shah, S. H. A., & Nath, M. (2024). 1-D basin modeling, 3-D reservoir mapping and source rock generative potential of Balkassar oilfield, Potwar basin, Pakistan. Petroleum Science and Technology, 42(20), 2843-2867.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pervaiz, M., & Wang, Y. (2024). Seismic reflection data interpretation and petrophysical evaluation of the Meyal area, the Potwar Basin, Pakistan. Interpretation, 12(4), T453-T465.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shah, S. B. A., Shah, S. H. A., & Jamshed, K. (2023). An integrated palynofacies, geochemical and petrophysical analysis for characterizing mixed organic-rich carbonate and shale rocks of Dhulian oilfield Potwar Basin, Pakistan: Insights for multiple source and reservoir rocks evaluation. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 221, 111236.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kazmi, A. H., & Abbasi, I. A. (2008). Stratigraphy & historical geology of Pakistan. Department and National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan, 524.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Saberi, M. R. (2017). A closer look flatrock physics models and their assisted interpretation in seismic exploration. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 10(5), 71-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Onita, F. B., Ebeh, C. O., & Iriogbe, H. O. (2023). Advancing quantitative interpretation petrophysics: Integrating seismic petrophysics for enhanced subsurface characterization. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 4(6), 617-636.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, L. W., & Gregory, A. (1974). Formation velocity and density; the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics, 39(6), 770-780.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Raymer, L. L., Hunt, E. R., & Gardner, J. S. (1980, July). An improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform. In SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium (pp. SPWLA-1980). SPWLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Han, D.-H. (1987). Effects of porosity and clay content on acoustic properties of sandstones and unconsolidated sediments (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States).
    [Google Scholar]

Cited By (11)

  1. Grachik Eremyan, Adel M. Magdeev, Mohammed Al-Shargabi, Ivan V. Matveev, Ivan E. Smirnov, Gleb Y. Shishaev, Shadfar Davoodi. Enhancing Reservoir Simulation History Matching Using SHAP Value for Parameter Range Selection. Energies, 2026 , 19 (10).
    [CrossRef]
  2. Sergio Matias-Gutierres, Edgar Israel García-Otamendi, Hugo David Sánchez-Chávez, Roberto Cifuentes-Villafuerte. Three-Dimensional Fractal Modeling and Construction of Flow Capacity (kh) from Well Logs: A Case Study in Southeastern Mexico. Fractal and Fractional, 2026 , 10 (5).
    [CrossRef]
  3. Yufeng Shen, Yu Song, Jian Yi, Wentong He, Xuanlong Shan, Ang Li, Ying Bian, Nan Jiang, Shuyang Wang, Yongbo Zhang. Research Progress in Engineering Technology and Related Fields of Oil Shale In Situ Conversion Triggered by the Topochemical Reaction Method. Processes, 2026 , 14 (11).
    [CrossRef]
  4. Fuling Wang, Hongqi Cao, Chenyi Tang, Chengzhe Lu, Yixin Zhang, Rui Deng, Yandong Yang. Factor Analysis and Mechanism Revelation of Reservoir Conditions and Driving Fluids Affecting Geothermal Energy Extraction. Eng, 2026 , 7 (5).
    [CrossRef]
  5. Moataz Barakat, Dhyaa H. Haddad, Nader H. El-Gendy, Abdelmoniem Raef, Ahmed A. Badr, Mohamed Reda. Integrated 3D Reservoir Characterization of the Mesozoic–Cenozoic Succession in the Northern Hinge Zone: Insights from the Abu Gharadig Basin, Western Desert, Egypt. Energies, 2026 , 19 (9).
    [CrossRef]
  6. Huajun Min, Jinhui Xu, Shuangqing Liang, Chunyan Liu, Limin Zhao. The Origin of Organic Matter Pore Destruction in Post-Mature Shales of the Qiongzhusi Formation, Southwestern Upper Yangtze, China: Evidence from Scanning Electron Microscopy. Minerals, 2026 , 16 (5).
    [CrossRef]
  7. Marija Pejić, Duje Smirčić, Iva Kolenković Močilac, Anja Vrbaški, Petar Maruna, Dino Benedik, Ana Brcković Gruić, Josipa Kapuralić, Marko Cvetković. Sedimentary Controls on Organic Matter Preservation and Gamma-Ray Response in Marine Middle Miocene Successions: Insights from Surface Gamma-Ray Spectrometry Data. Applied Sciences, 2026 , 16 (11).
    [CrossRef]
  8. Peng Su, Shouzhi Hu, Honghan Chen, Simeng Cui, Yangfan Guo. Effects of Carnian Pluvial Episode on the Yanchang Formation Depositional Environment and Hydrocarbon Accumulation, Ordos Basin, China. Geosciences, 2026 , 16 (6).
    [CrossRef]
  9. Peisen Zhang, Kaixuan Zhang, Lei Tu, Shubao Wu, Peng Xiao. Study on Overburden Migration Law During Working Face Mining After Grouting Reconstruction of Unconsolidated Aquifer. Processes, 2026 , 14 (9).
    [CrossRef]
  10. Kuan Lu, Jiakai Hou, Zhenkai Huang, Guangyou Zhu, Jianyong Liu, Jiangna Fu, Heting Gao. Fracture Development in Alkaline Lacustrine Shales: Insights from Multi-Stage Fluid–Rock Interactions in the Permian Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin. Minerals, 2026 , 16 (4).
    [CrossRef]
  11. Xiaokai Xu, Yue Xin, Qingchao Li, Shuo Zhang, Lin Tian, Zhengzheng Xue. Experimental Investigation of Permeability Sensitivity of Coal Reservoir to Reservoir Pressure and Its Fluid–Solid Coupling Control Mechanism. Energies, 2026 , 19 (9).
    [CrossRef]
* Citation data provided by Crossref Cited-by.

Cite This Article

APA Style
Khan, M., Nawaz, S., Gao, X., & Khan, N. M. (2026). Reservoir Characterization of Eocene Carbonates and Cambrian Sands in the Eastern Potwar Region, Pakistan. Reservoir Science, 2(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.62762/RS.2026.819359
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Khan, Majid
AU  - Nawaz, Shahid
AU  - Gao, Xuehong
AU  - Khan, Naseer Muhammad
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/03/25
TI  - Reservoir Characterization of Eocene Carbonates and Cambrian Sands in the Eastern Potwar Region, Pakistan
JO  - Reservoir Science
T2  - Reservoir Science
JF  - Reservoir Science
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
SP  - 111
EP  - 125
DO  - 10.62762/RS.2026.819359
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/RS.2026.819359
KW  - reservoir characterization
KW  - velocity-porosity relationship
KW  - seismic interpretation
KW  - rock physics modeling
AB  - Hydrocarbon prospectivity in fold-and-thrust belts remains inherently uncertain due to the combined effects of structural complexity and heterogeneous reservoir properties. The Eastern Potwar region of Pakistan, characterized by imbricate thrust systems, anticlines, and synclines, represents a typical example where conventional approaches often fail to adequately constrain reservoir quality. This study integrates seismic interpretation with rock physics modeling to evaluate the hydrocarbon potential of the Missakeswal area. Seismic analysis delineates the structural framework controlling trap development, while rock physics modeling of well log data provides quantitative constraints on lithology, porosity, and fluid effects within Eocene carbonates and Cambrian sandstones. The results demonstrate a clear inverse relationship between velocity and porosity in the carbonate units, together with significant deviations from standard empirical models in both carbonate and sandstone intervals. In particular, the Eocene carbonates exhibit deviations of up to 25% from the Raymer model for water-saturated limestone, indicating probable hydrocarbon saturation, whereas the Cambrian sands show dispersion consistent with clay-influenced elastic behavior. The integrated interpretation highlights the Missakeswal area as a promising exploration target, and demonstrates that the combined use of seismic and rock physics analysis provides a robust framework for reducing uncertainty and improving reservoir characterization in tectonically complex basins.
SN  - 3070-2356
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Khan2026Reservoir,
  author = {Majid Khan and Shahid Nawaz and Xuehong Gao and Naseer Muhammad Khan},
  title = {Reservoir Characterization of Eocene Carbonates and Cambrian Sands in the Eastern Potwar Region, Pakistan},
  journal = {Reservoir Science},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {111-125},
  doi = {10.62762/RS.2026.819359},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/RS.2026.819359},
  abstract = {Hydrocarbon prospectivity in fold-and-thrust belts remains inherently uncertain due to the combined effects of structural complexity and heterogeneous reservoir properties. The Eastern Potwar region of Pakistan, characterized by imbricate thrust systems, anticlines, and synclines, represents a typical example where conventional approaches often fail to adequately constrain reservoir quality. This study integrates seismic interpretation with rock physics modeling to evaluate the hydrocarbon potential of the Missakeswal area. Seismic analysis delineates the structural framework controlling trap development, while rock physics modeling of well log data provides quantitative constraints on lithology, porosity, and fluid effects within Eocene carbonates and Cambrian sandstones. The results demonstrate a clear inverse relationship between velocity and porosity in the carbonate units, together with significant deviations from standard empirical models in both carbonate and sandstone intervals. In particular, the Eocene carbonates exhibit deviations of up to 25\% from the Raymer model for water-saturated limestone, indicating probable hydrocarbon saturation, whereas the Cambrian sands show dispersion consistent with clay-influenced elastic behavior. The integrated interpretation highlights the Missakeswal area as a promising exploration target, and demonstrates that the combined use of seismic and rock physics analysis provides a robust framework for reducing uncertainty and improving reservoir characterization in tectonically complex basins.},
  keywords = {reservoir characterization, velocity-porosity relationship, seismic interpretation, rock physics modeling},
  issn = {3070-2356},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
11
Scopus
8
Views
761
PDF Downloads
166

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Reservoir Science
Reservoir Science
ISSN: 3070-2356 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico