Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques
Research Article  ·  Published: 30 April 2026
Issue cover
Reservoir Science
Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026: 151-171
Research Article Open Access

Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques

1 Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, School of Petroleum Studies, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana
2 School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3 Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, United States
* Corresponding Author: Eric Thompson Brantson, [email protected]
Volume 2, Issue 2

Article Information

Published in Reservoir Science
Pages 151-171

Abstract

Enthalpy is a key thermodynamic parameter governing energy extraction efficiency in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). Although Machine Learning (ML) has been widely applied in geothermal modeling, few studies have systematically integrated Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with ML to develop and compare multiple predictive models for enthalpy production. Using datasets from CMG STARS simulations, we developed predictive models based on RSM and four ML techniques (Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine). A Central Composite Design (CCD) in CMG CMOST established relationships between operational parameters and enthalpy, while Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) determined the optimal operating conditions within the investigated design space. The RSM model achieved an \(R^2\) of 0.999404, outperforming Random Forest (0.9929), Decision Tree (0.9882), XGBoost (0.9883), and Support Vector Machine (0.9888). PSO optimization yielded a maximum cumulative enthalpy of \(4.507 \times 10^{16}\) J. These results demonstrate that integrating RSM with ML provides accurate and robust predictive capability with efficient optimization of geothermal reservoir performance. This study offers a structured framework combining statistical and data-driven approaches to improve geothermal energy assessment and decision-making.

Graphical Abstract

Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques

Keywords

geothermal reservoir response surface methodology enthalpy prediction particle swarm optimization enhanced geothermal system

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AI Use Statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. He, J., Li, K., Wang, X., Gao, N., Mao, X., & Jia, L. (2022). A Machine Learning Methodology for Predicting Geothermal Heat Flow in the Bohai Bay Basin, China. Natural Resources Research, 31(1), 237-260.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hou, J., Cao, M., & Liu, P. (2018). Development and Utilization of Geothermal Energy in China: Current Practices and Future Strategies. Renewable Energy, 125, 401-412.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, K., Bian, H., Liu, C., Zhang, D., & Yang, Y. (2015). Comparison of Geothermal with Solar and Wind Power Generation Systems. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1464-1474.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, C., Jiang, G., Jia, X., Li, S., Zhang, S., Hu, D., ... & Wang, Y. (2019). Parametric study of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system: A case study at the Qiabuqia geothermal area, northeast Tibetan plateau. Renewable energy, 132, 959-978.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, C., Wang, X., Jiang, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). Numerical simulation of geothermal energy production from hot dry rocks under the interplay between the heterogeneous fracture and stimulated reservoir volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137724.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Suzuki, A., Fomin, S. A., Chugunov, V. A., Niibori, Y., & Hashida, T. (2016). Fractional Diffusion Modeling of Heat Transfer in Porous and Fractured Media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 103, 611-618.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zeng, Y. C., Su, Z., & Wu, N. Y. (2013). Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field. Energy, 56, 92-107.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, S., Huang, Z., Wu, Y. S., Winterfeld, P. H., & Zerpa, L. E. (2016). A semi-analytical correlation of thermal-hydraulic-mechanical behavior of fractures and its application to modeling reservoir scale cold water injection problems in enhanced geothermal reservoirs. Geothermics, 64, 81-95.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gudala, M., & Govindarajan, S. K. (2021). Numerical investigations on a geothermal reservoir using fully coupled thermo-hydro-geomechanics with integrated RSM-machine learning and ARIMA models. Geothermics, 96, 102174.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raschka, S., Patterson, J., & Nolet, C. (2020). Machine learning in python: Main developments and technology trends in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. Information, 11(4), 193.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Srivastava, S. K. (2020, July). Application of artificial intelligence in renewable energy. In 2020 international conference on computational performance evaluation (ComPE) (pp. 327-331). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhattacharya, S. (2021). Central composite design for response surface methodology and its application in pharmacy. In Response surface methodology in engineering science. IntechOpen.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goren, A. Y., Recepoğlu, Y. K., & Khataee, A. (2022). Language of response surface methodology as an experimental strategy for electrochemical wastewater treatment process optimization. In artificial intelligence and data science in environmental sensing (pp. 57-92). Academic Press.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Anifowose, F., Abdulraheem, A., & Al-Shuhail, A. (2019). A parametric study of machine learning techniques in petroleum reservoir permeability prediction by integrating seismic attributes and wireline data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 176, 762-774.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao, Q., Banerjee, R., Gupta, S., Li, J., Zhou, W., & Jeyachandra, B. (2016, June). Data driven production forecasting using machine learning. In SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of unconventional resources symposium (p. D021S006R001). SPE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Onwuchekwa, C. (2018, August). Application of machine learning ideas to reservoir fluid properties estimation. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (pp. SPE-193461). SPE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ounsakul, T., Sirirattanachatchawan, T., Pattarachupong, W., Yokrat, Y., & Ekkawong, P. (2019, March). Artificial lift selection using machine learning. In International petroleum technology conference (p. D021S042R003). IPTC.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Samnioti, A., & Gaganis, V. (2023). Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation--A Review--Part II. Energies, 16(18), 6727.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ahmad, T., & Chen, H. (2020). A review on machine learning forecasting growth trends and their real-time applications in different energy systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 102010.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gudmundsdottir, H., & Horne, R. N. (2020, February). Prediction modeling for geothermal reservoirs using deep learning. In 45th workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering. Stanford, California: Stanford University (pp. 1-12).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Y., Júlíusson, E., Pálsson, H., Stefánsson, H., & Valfells, Á. (2017). Machine Learning for Creation of Generalized Lumped Parameter Tank Models of Low Temperature Geothermal Reservoir Systems. Geothermics, 70, 62-84.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, A., Qin, Z., Faulder, D., Cladouhos, T. T., & Jafarpour, B. (2022). Recurrent Neural Networks for Short-term and Long-term Prediction of Geothermal Reservoirs. Geothermics, 104, 102439.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Assouline, D., Mohajeri, N., Gudmundsson, A., & Scartezzini, J. L. (2019). A machine learning approach for mapping the very shallow theoretical geothermal potential. Geothermal Energy, 7(1), 19.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spichak, V., Geiermann, J., Zakharova, O., Calcagno, P., Genter, A., & Schill, E. (2015). Estimating deep temperatures in the Soultz-sous-Forêts geothermal area (France) from magnetotelluric data. Near Surface Geophysics, 13(4), 397-408.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995, November). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks (Vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chan, H. P., Chang, C. P., & Dao, P. D. (2018). Geothermal anomaly mapping using landsat etm+ data in ilan plain, northeastern taiwan. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175(1), 303-323.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Feng, J., Zhang, Y., He, Z., Gao, C., & Zhang, L. (2019, February). A Discussion of Methodology Study on Geothermal Reservoir Evaluating. In Proceedings, 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering (pp. 1-7).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dong, L., Li, X., Xu, M., & Li, Q. (2011). Comparisons of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine for Predicting Blasting Vibration Characteristic Parameters. Procedia Engineering, 26, 1772-1781.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishitsuka, K., Kobayashi, Y., Watanabe, N., Yamaya, Y., Bjarkason, E. K., Suzuki, A., Mogi, T., Asanuma, H., Kajiwara, T., Sugimoto, T., & Saito, R. (2021). Bayesian and Neural Network Approaches to Estimate Deep Temperature Distribution for Assessing a Supercritical Geothermal System: Evaluation Using a Numerical Model. Natural Resources Research, 30(5), 3289-3314.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rezvanbehbahani, S., Stearns, L. A., Kadivar, A., Walker, J. D., & van der Veen, C. J. (2017). Predicting the geothermal heat flux in Greenland: A machine learning approach. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(24), 12-271.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zheng, Y., Li, J., Lin, R., Hu, H., Gao, K., & Huang, L. (2021, February). Physics-guided machine learning approach to characterizing small-scale fractures in geothermal fields. In Proceedings, forty-sixth workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University (pp. 1-9).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Holtzman, B. K., Paté, A., Paisley, J., Waldhauser, F., & Repetto, D. (2018). Machine learning reveals cyclic changes in seismic source spectra in Geysers geothermal field. Science advances, 4(5), eaao2929.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ait-Amir, B., Pougnet, P., & El Hami, A. (2020). Meta-model development. In Embedded mechatronic systems 2 (pp. 157-187). ISTE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maharsi, D. A., Ta’dung, J. C., Jannoke, L., & Budi, I. S. (2022). Sensitivity Analysis Using One-Factor-at-a-Time and Response Surface Method in Liquid-Dominated Geothermal Reservoir. PETRO: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan, 11(3), 138-148.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sutopo, Prabata, W., & Pratama, H. B. (2019). The development study of Karaha–Talaga Bodas geothermal field using numerical simulation. Geothermal Energy, 7(1), 21.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Brantson, E. T., Ju, B., Ziggah, Y. Y., Akwensi, P. H., Sun, Y., Wu, D., & Addo, B. (2018). Forecasting of Horizontal Gas Well Production Decline in Unconventional Reservoirs using Productivity, Soft Computing and Swarm Intelligence Models. Natural Resources Research, 28(3), 717-756.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shi, H., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., Guo, J., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., ... & Bai, L. (2025). A novel machine learning approach for reservoir temperature prediction. Geothermics, 125, 103204.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shahdi, A., Lee, S., Karpatne, A., & Nojabaei, B. (2021). Exploratory Analysis of Machine Learning Methods in Predicting Subsurface Temperature and Geothermal Gradient of Northeastern United States. Geothermal Energy, 9(1).
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Siler, D. L., Pepin, J. D., Vesselinov, V. V., Mudunuru, M. K., & Ahmmed, B. (2021). Machine learning to identify geologic factors associated with production in geothermal fields: a case-study using 3D geologic data, Brady geothermal field, Nevada. Geothermal Energy, 9(1), 17.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Brantson, E. T., Iyiola, Z. O., Ziggah, Y. Y., Mensah, A. O., Otchere, D. A., Abakah-Paintsil, E. E., & Duodu, E. K. (2024). Carbon Dioxide Low Salinity Water Alternating Gas (CO2 LSWAG) Oil Recovery Factor Prediction in Carbonate Reservoir: Using Supervised Machine Learning Models. In Data Science and Machine Learning Applications in Subsurface Engineering (pp. 125-158). CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, M., Yang, F., Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., Feng, J., Luo, J., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Probabilistic geothermal resource assessment in Maichen Sag, south China. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 972125.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ye, Z., Wang, J. G., & Yang, J. (2024). A Multi-objective Optimization Approach for a Fault Geothermal System Based on Response Surface Method. Geothermics, 117, 102887.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cited By (5)

  1. Zhenfeng Zhang, Chong Jiang, Aiyun Song, Yixin Wang, Yangling Chen, Shiqiao Ruan, Ying Zhao. Quantifying the Cross-Regional Spillover Effects of Offshore Wind Power on National Carbon Footprint: Insights from China’s Two Largest Installed Capacity Provinces. Sustainability, 2026 , 18 (12).
    [CrossRef]
  2. Wenlong Xia, Zhaoyu Wang, Xiaodong Dai, Changlei Tan, Chenlong Duan, Fankun Meng. Ensemble Feature Engineering and Crayfish Optimization Algorithm-Optimized Random Forest for Productivity Prediction in High-Water-Cut Offshore Reservoirs. Processes, 2026 , 14 (11).
    [CrossRef]
  3. Peng Su, Shouzhi Hu, Honghan Chen, Simeng Cui, Yangfan Guo. Effects of Carnian Pluvial Episode on the Yanchang Formation Depositional Environment and Hydrocarbon Accumulation, Ordos Basin, China. Geosciences, 2026 , 16 (6).
    [CrossRef]
  4. Shunzuo Qiu, Zhaoliang Zhu, Yan Yang, Qin Liu, Yan Jiang, Caixia Xian. Effect of Structural Parameters on Performance of Dissolvable Metal Ball Seat Sealing Rings in Frac Plug. Technologies, 2026 , 14 (6).
    [CrossRef]
  5. Ze Li, Bo Zeng, Xiaojin Zhou, Huan Peng, Yongjun Xiao, Juntao Yan, Wang Liu, Jun Su. Optimization of pump rate for hydraulic fracturing of shale in the Qiongzhusi Formation. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2026 , 14 .
    [CrossRef]
* Citation data provided by Crossref Cited-by.

Cite This Article

APA Style
Brantson, E. T., Obeng, S. D. A., Ocran, D., Duodu, E. K., Iyiola, Z. O., Adjei, E. J., Adu-Awuku, J., & Owusu, A. G. (2026). Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques. Reservoir Science, 2(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.62762/RS.2026.366192
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Brantson, Eric Thompson
AU  - Obeng, Stephen Dwamena Akoto
AU  - Ocran, Daniel
AU  - Duodu, Emmanuel Karikari
AU  - Iyiola, Zainab Ololade
AU  - Adjei, Eugene Jerry
AU  - Adu-Awuku, Joel
AU  - Owusu, Adu Gyamfi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/04/30
TI  - Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques
JO  - Reservoir Science
T2  - Reservoir Science
JF  - Reservoir Science
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
SP  - 151
EP  - 171
DO  - 10.62762/RS.2026.366192
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/RS.2026.366192
KW  - geothermal reservoir
KW  - response surface methodology
KW  - enthalpy prediction
KW  - particle swarm optimization
KW  - enhanced geothermal system
AB  - Enthalpy is a key thermodynamic parameter governing energy extraction efficiency in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). Although Machine Learning (ML) has been widely applied in geothermal modeling, few studies have systematically integrated Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with ML to develop and compare multiple predictive models for enthalpy production. Using datasets from CMG STARS simulations, we developed predictive models based on RSM and four ML techniques (Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine). A Central Composite Design (CCD) in CMG CMOST established relationships between operational parameters and enthalpy, while Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) determined the optimal operating conditions within the investigated design space. The RSM model achieved an \(R^2\) of 0.999404, outperforming Random Forest (0.9929), Decision Tree (0.9882), XGBoost (0.9883), and Support Vector Machine (0.9888). PSO optimization yielded a maximum cumulative enthalpy of \(4.507 \times 10^{16}\) J. These results demonstrate that integrating RSM with ML provides accurate and robust predictive capability with efficient optimization of geothermal reservoir performance. This study offers a structured framework combining statistical and data-driven approaches to improve geothermal energy assessment and decision-making.
SN  - 3070-2356
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Brantson2026Evaluating,
  author = {Eric Thompson Brantson and Stephen Dwamena Akoto Obeng and Daniel Ocran and Emmanuel Karikari Duodu and Zainab Ololade Iyiola and Eugene Jerry Adjei and Joel Adu-Awuku and Adu Gyamfi Owusu},
  title = {Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques},
  journal = {Reservoir Science},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {151-171},
  doi = {10.62762/RS.2026.366192},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/RS.2026.366192},
  abstract = {Enthalpy is a key thermodynamic parameter governing energy extraction efficiency in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). Although Machine Learning (ML) has been widely applied in geothermal modeling, few studies have systematically integrated Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with ML to develop and compare multiple predictive models for enthalpy production. Using datasets from CMG STARS simulations, we developed predictive models based on RSM and four ML techniques (Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine). A Central Composite Design (CCD) in CMG CMOST established relationships between operational parameters and enthalpy, while Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) determined the optimal operating conditions within the investigated design space. The RSM model achieved an \(R^2\) of 0.999404, outperforming Random Forest (0.9929), Decision Tree (0.9882), XGBoost (0.9883), and Support Vector Machine (0.9888). PSO optimization yielded a maximum cumulative enthalpy of \(4.507 \times 10^{16}\) J. These results demonstrate that integrating RSM with ML provides accurate and robust predictive capability with efficient optimization of geothermal reservoir performance. This study offers a structured framework combining statistical and data-driven approaches to improve geothermal energy assessment and decision-making.},
  keywords = {geothermal reservoir, response surface methodology, enthalpy prediction, particle swarm optimization, enhanced geothermal system},
  issn = {3070-2356},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
5
Scopus
2
Views
834
PDF Downloads
152

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

CC BY Copyright © 2026 by the Author(s). Published by Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
Reservoir Science
Reservoir Science
ISSN: 3070-2356 (Online)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico