Vehicular Network Security Through Optimized Deep Learning Model with Feature Selection Techniques
Research Article  ·  Published: 31 December 2024
Issue cover
ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control
Volume 1, Issue 2, 2024: 136-153
Research Article Free to Read

Vehicular Network Security Through Optimized Deep Learning Model with Feature Selection Techniques

1 Department of Computer Science, Qurtuba University of Science & Information Technology, 25000 Peshawar, Pakistan
2 Department of Computer Science, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan
3 College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering; and College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
4 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland
5 Department of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea
* Corresponding Authors: Taj Rahman, [email protected]; Inam Ullah, [email protected]
Volume 1, Issue 2

Abstract

In recent years, vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have faced growing security concerns, particularly from Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. These attacks flood the network with malicious traffic, disrupting services and compromising resource availability. While various techniques have been proposed to address these threats, this study presents an optimized framework leveraging advanced deep-learning models for improved detection accuracy. The proposed Intrusion Detection System (IDS) employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Deep Belief Networks (DBN) alongside robust feature selection techniques, Random Projection (RP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). This framework extracts and analyzes significant features using a publicly available application-layer DoS attack dataset, achieving higher detection accuracy than traditional methods. Experimental results indicate that combining CNN, LSTM networks, and DBN with feature selection techniques like Random Projection (RP) and PCA results in improved classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.994, surpassing the state-of-the-art machine learning models. This novel approach enhances the reliability and safety of vehicle communications by providing efficient, real-time threat detection. The findings contribute significantly to VANET security, laying a robust foundation for future advancements in connected vehicle protection.

Graphical Abstract

Vehicular Network Security Through Optimized Deep Learning Model with Feature Selection Techniques

Keywords

vehicular networks security denial of service (DoS) detection deep learning intrusion detection feature optimization techniques connected vehicle protection

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work was supported without any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. Asra, S. A. (2022). Security issues of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET): A systematic review. TIERS Information Technology Journal, 3(1), 17-27.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Phan, T. C., & Singh, P. (2023). A recent connected vehicle-IoT automotive application based on communication technology. International journal of data informatics and intelligent computing, 2(4), 40-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, Z., Wei, H., Wang, J., Zeng, X., & Chang, Y. (2022). Security issues and solutions for connected and autonomous vehicles in a sustainable city: A survey. Sustainability, 14(19), 12409.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdulkadhim, F. G., Yi, Z., Onaizah, A. N., Rabee, F., & Al-Muqarm, A. M. A. (2022). Optimizing the roadside unit deployment mechanism in VANET with efficient protocol to prevent data loss. Wireless Personal Communications, 127(1), 815-843.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zamrai, M. A. H., Yusof, K. M., & Azizan, A. (2024). Dissecting Denial of Service (DoS) Syn Flood Attack Dynamics and Impacts in Vehicular Communication Systems. In ITM Web of Conferences (Vol. 63, p. 01008). EDP Sciences.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tariq, U. (2024). Optimized Feature Selection for DDoS Attack Recognition and Mitigation in SD-VANETs. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(9).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Setitra, M. A., & Fan, M. (2024). Detection of DDoS attacks in SDN-based VANET using optimized TabNet. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 90, 103845.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Banafshehvaragh, S. T., & Rahmani, A. M. (2023). Intrusion, anomaly, and attack detection in smart vehicles. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 96, 104726.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Han, M. L., Kwak, B. I., & Kim, H. K. (2018). Anomaly intrusion detection method for vehicular networks based on survival analysis. Vehicular communications, 14, 52-63.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumaragurubaran, S., & Vijayakumar, N. (2024). A novel swarm intelligence‐based fuzzy logic in efficient connectivity of vehicles. International Journal of Communication Systems, 37(11), e5795.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ayyub, M., Oracevic, A., Hussain, R., Khan, A. A., & Zhang, Z. (2022). A comprehensive survey on clustering in vehicular networks: Current solutions and future challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 124, 102729.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nasir, R., Ashraf, H., & Jhanjhi, N. Z. (2023). Secure Authentication Mechanism for Cluster based Vehicular Adhoc Network (VANET): A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12925.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bangui, H., Ge, M., & Buhnova, B. (2022). A hybrid machine learning model for intrusion detection in VANET. Computing, 104(3), 503-531.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hussein, N. H., Yaw, C. T., Koh, S. P., Tiong, S. K., & Chong, K. H. (2022). A comprehensive survey on vehicular networking: Communications, applications, challenges, and upcoming research directions. IEEE Access, 10, 86127-86180.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Talpur, A., & Gurusamy, M. (2021). Machine learning for security in vehicular networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1), 346-379.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raza, M., Barket, A. R., Rehman, A. U., Rehman, A., & Ullah, I. (2020, August). Mobile crowdsensing based architecture for intelligent traffic prediction and quickest path selection. In 2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Alqahtani, H., & Kumar, G. (2024). Machine learning for enhancing transportation security: A comprehensive analysis of electric and flying vehicle systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 129, 107667.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Alsarhan, A., Alauthman, M., Alshdaifat, E. A., Al-Ghuwairi, A. R., & Al-Dubai, A. (2023). Machine Learning-driven optimization for SVM-based intrusion detection system in vehicular ad hoc networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(5), 6113-6122.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gyamfi, E., & Jurcut, A. (2022). Intrusion detection in internet of things systems: a review on design approaches leveraging multi-access edge computing, machine learning, and datasets. Sensors, 22(10), 3744.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Al-Shareeda, M. A., & Manickam, S. (2023). A systematic literature review on security of vehicular ad-hoc network (vanet) based on veins framework. IEEE Access, 11, 46218-46228.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hassan, S. M., Mohamad, M. M., & Muchtar, F. B. (2024). Advanced Intrusion Detection in MANETs: A Survey of Machine Learning and Optimization Techniques for Mitigating Black/Gray Hole Attacks. IEEE Access.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Soares, K., & Shinde, A. A. (2024, March). Intrusion Detection Systems in VANET: A Review on Implementation Techniques and Datasets. In 2024 5th International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV) (pp. 897-905). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Otoum, Y., & Nayak, A. (2021). As-ids: Anomaly and signature based ids for the internet of things. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 29(3), 23.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Najar, A. A., & Manohar Naik, S. (2022). DDoS attack detection using MLP and Random Forest Algorithms. International Journal of Information Technology, 14(5), 2317-2327.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, Y., Wang, X., Ariffin, M. M., Abolfathi, M., Alqhatani, A., & Almutairi, L. (2023). Attack detection analysis in software-defined networks using various machine learning method. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 108, 108655.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Manivannan, D. (2024). Recent endeavors in machine learning-powered intrusion detection systems for the Internet of Things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 103925.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bakro, M., Kumar, R. R., Alabrah, A., Ashraf, Z., Ahmed, M. N., Shameem, M., & Abdelsalam, A. (2023). An improved design for a cloud intrusion detection system using hybrid features selection approach with ML classifier. IEEE Access, 11, 64228-64247.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Almehdhar, M., Albaseer, A., Khan, M. A., Abdallah, M., Menouar, H., Al-Kuwari, S., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2024). Deep learning in the fast lane: A survey on advanced intrusion detection systems for intelligent vehicle networks. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mazhar, S., Rakib, A., Pan, L., Jiang, F., Anwar, A., Doss, R., & Bryans, J. (2024). State-of-the-Art Authentication and Verification Schemes in VANETs: A Survey. Vehicular Communications, 100804.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Alotaibi, Y., & Ilyas, M. (2023). Ensemble-learning framework for intrusion detection to enhance internet of things’ devices security. Sensors, 23(12), 5568.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nabi, F., & Zhou, X. (2024). Enhancing intrusion detection systems through dimensionality reduction: A comparative study of machine learning techniques for cyber security. Cyber Security and Applications, 100033.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Prathiba, S. B., Raja, G., Anbalagan, S., KS, A., Gurumoorthy, S., & Dev, K. (2022). A hybrid deep sensor anomaly detection for autonomous vehicles in 6G-V2X environment. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 10(3), 1246-1255.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sohn, I. (2021). Deep belief network based intrusion detection techniques: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 167, 114170.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sharafian, A., Ullah, I., Singh, S. K., Ali, A., Khan, H., & Bai, X. (2024). Adaptive fuzzy backstepping secure control for incommensurate fractional order cyber–physical power systems under intermittent denial of service attacks. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 186, 115288.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Akande, H. B., Awoniyi, C., Ogundokun, R. O., Oloyede, A. A., Yiamiyu, O. A., & Caroline, A. T. (2024, April). Enhancing Network Security: Intrusion Detection Systems with Hybridized CNN and DNN Algorithms. In 2024 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Driving Sustainable Development Goals (SEB4SDG) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khan, I. U., Khan, F. M., Haider, Z. A., Khattak, S., Naheed, G., & Kiani, S. S. Dynamic Malware Detection Using Effective Machine Learning Models with Feature Selection Techniques.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rajender, N., & Gopalachari, M. V. (2024). An efficient dimensionality reduction based on adaptive-GSM and transformer assisted classification for high dimensional data. International Journal of Information Technology, 16(1), 403-416.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Anitha, T., Aanjankumar, S., Poonkuntran, S., & Nayyar, A. (2023). A novel methodology for malicious traffic detection in smart devices using BI-LSTM–CNN-dependent deep learning methodology. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(27), 20319-20338.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ullah, I., Ali, F., Khan, H., Khan, F., & Bai, X. (2024). Ubiquitous computation in internet of vehicles for human-centric transport systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 161, 108394.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. SHARIPUDDIN, W., EA, M., ZZ, K., WIJAYA, I., & SANDRA, D. (2023). Improvement detection system on complex network using hybrid deep belief network and selection features. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 31(1), 470-479.
    [Google Scholar]

Cited By (12)

  1. Wenyi Liu, Tongming Jian, Lei Meng, Di Song, Jianbin Cao. A novel wind turbine fault diagnosis method based on improved TFMST and DSC-CNN-GRU model. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, 2026 , 14 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  2. Wenbo Gu, Ruizhe Ma, Yang Yu, Zongmin Ma. FPSO-Time: A Fuzzy Time Series Forecasting Method Based on Fuzzy Particle Swarm Optimization and Reprogrammed Large Language Models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2026 , 34 (2).
    [CrossRef]
  3. G. Mahalakshmi, G. Sumathi, M. Prakash, P. Solainayagi. Enhancing VANET Security Through ANFIS‐Based Intrusion Detection and Element Perturbation. International Journal of Communication Systems, 2026 , 39 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  4. Peng You, Peng Chen, Xi Li, Ang Bian. Gated Memory-Guided Multi-scale spatio–temporal–spectral feature fusion network for unsupervised Internet of Things time series anomaly detection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2026 , 169 .
    [CrossRef]
  5. Muhammad Shoaib Khan, Hongsong Chen, XinJian Ma. Resource-efficient anomaly detection in social media accounts using lightweight LLM models: a review of methods, challenges, and future trends. Cluster Computing, 2026 , 29 (5).
    [CrossRef]
  6. Qiong Li, Rongsheng Cai, Yizhao Zhu. GHPPFL: A Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Based on Gradient Compression and Homomorphic Encryption in Consumer App Security. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2025 , 71 (2).
    [CrossRef]
  7. Qiang Li, Ruidong Liu, Yalei Liu, Zhenzhong Wei. Research on Registration Methods for Coupled Errors in Maneuvering Platforms. Entropy, 2025 , 27 (6).
    [CrossRef]
  8. Zeeshan Ali Haider, Asim Zeb, Taj Rahman, Sushil Kumar Singh, Rizwan Akram, Ali Arishi, Inam Ullah. A Survey on anomaly detection in IoT: Techniques, challenges, and opportunities with the integration of 6G. Computer Networks, 2025 , 270 .
    [CrossRef]
  9. Zhe Zhang, Niaona Zhang. A parallel preceding vehicle speed prediction method combining deep belief networks and gated recurrent units. Journal of Control and Decision, 2025 .
    [CrossRef]
  10. Tarak Nandy, Sananda Bhattacharyya. A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning for Authentication in Vehicular Communication. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025 , 85 (1).
    [CrossRef]
  11. Inam Ullah Khan, Fida Muhammad Khan, Zeeshan Ali Haider, Fahad Alturise. Integrating AI, Blockchain, and Edge Computing for Zero-Trust IoT Security: A Comprehensive Review of Advanced Cybersecurity Framework. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025 , 85 (3).
    [CrossRef]
  12. Yuwen Zhao, Weifang Liang, Zhi Gong, Shibing Sun, Shayan Nejadshamsi. DSEAGC: Dual-spectral embedding for attributed graph clustering. Internet of Things, 2025 , 32 .
    [CrossRef]
* Citation data provided by Crossref Cited-by.

Cite This Article

APA Style
Khan, F. M., Rahman, T., Zeb, A., Haider, Z. A., Khan, I. U., Bilal, H., Khan, M. A. & Ullah, I. (2024). Vehicular Network Security Through Optimized Deep Learning Model with Feature Selection Techniques. ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control, 1(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.62762/TSCC.2024.626147
Export Citation
RIS Format
Compatible with EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and other reference managers
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Khan, Fida Muhammad
AU  - Rahman, Taj
AU  - Zeb, Asim
AU  - Haider, Zeeshan Ali
AU  - Khan, Inam Ullah
AU  - Bilal, Hazrat
AU  - Khan, Muhammad Abbas
AU  - Ullah, Inam
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/12/31
TI  - Vehicular Network Security Through Optimized Deep Learning Model with Feature Selection Techniques
JO  - ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control
T2  - ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control
JF  - ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control
VL  - 1
IS  - 2
SP  - 136
EP  - 153
DO  - 10.62762/TSCC.2024.626147
UR  - https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TSCC.2024.626147
KW  - vehicular networks security
KW  - denial of service (DoS) detection
KW  - deep learning intrusion detection
KW  - feature optimization techniques
KW  - connected vehicle protection
AB  - In recent years, vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have faced growing security concerns, particularly from Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. These attacks flood the network with malicious traffic, disrupting services and compromising resource availability. While various techniques have been proposed to address these threats, this study presents an optimized framework leveraging advanced deep-learning models for improved detection accuracy. The proposed Intrusion Detection System (IDS) employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Deep Belief Networks (DBN) alongside robust feature selection techniques, Random Projection (RP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). This framework extracts and analyzes significant features using a publicly available application-layer DoS attack dataset, achieving higher detection accuracy than traditional methods. Experimental results indicate that combining CNN, LSTM networks, and DBN with feature selection techniques like Random Projection (RP) and PCA results in improved classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.994, surpassing the state-of-the-art machine learning models. This novel approach enhances the reliability and safety of vehicle communications by providing efficient, real-time threat detection. The findings contribute significantly to VANET security, laying a robust foundation for future advancements in connected vehicle protection.
SN  - 3068-9287
PB  - Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge
LA  - English
ER  - 
BibTeX Format
Compatible with LaTeX, BibTeX, and other reference managers
@article{Khan2024Vehicular,
  author = {Fida Muhammad Khan and Taj Rahman and Asim Zeb and Zeeshan Ali Haider and Inam Ullah Khan and Hazrat Bilal and Muhammad Abbas Khan and Inam Ullah},
  title = {Vehicular Network Security Through Optimized Deep Learning Model with Feature Selection Techniques},
  journal = {ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control},
  year = {2024},
  volume = {1},
  number = {2},
  pages = {136-153},
  doi = {10.62762/TSCC.2024.626147},
  url = {https://www.icck.org/article/abs/TSCC.2024.626147},
  abstract = {In recent years, vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have faced growing security concerns, particularly from Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. These attacks flood the network with malicious traffic, disrupting services and compromising resource availability. While various techniques have been proposed to address these threats, this study presents an optimized framework leveraging advanced deep-learning models for improved detection accuracy. The proposed Intrusion Detection System (IDS) employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Deep Belief Networks (DBN) alongside robust feature selection techniques, Random Projection (RP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). This framework extracts and analyzes significant features using a publicly available application-layer DoS attack dataset, achieving higher detection accuracy than traditional methods. Experimental results indicate that combining CNN, LSTM networks, and DBN with feature selection techniques like Random Projection (RP) and PCA results in improved classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.994, surpassing the state-of-the-art machine learning models. This novel approach enhances the reliability and safety of vehicle communications by providing efficient, real-time threat detection. The findings contribute significantly to VANET security, laying a robust foundation for future advancements in connected vehicle protection.},
  keywords = {vehicular networks security, denial of service (DoS) detection, deep learning intrusion detection, feature optimization techniques, connected vehicle protection},
  issn = {3068-9287},
  publisher = {Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge}
}

Article Metrics

Citations
Crossref
12
Scopus
21
Views
5398
PDF Downloads
653

Publisher's Note

ICCK stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and Permissions

Institute of Central Computation and Knowledge (ICCK) or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control
ICCK Transactions on Sensing, Communication, and Control
ISSN: 3068-9287 (Online) | ISSN: 3068-9279 (Print)
Portico
Preserved at
Portico